Literature DB >> 32001946

Phenological plasticity is a poor predictor of subalpine plant population performance following experimental climate change.

Sebastián Block1, Jake M Alexander1, Jonathan M Levine1,2.   

Abstract

Phenological shifts, changes in the seasonal timing of life cycle events, are among the best documented responses of species to climate change. However, the consequences of these phenological shifts for population dynamics remain unclear. Population growth could be enhanced if species that advance their phenology benefit from longer growing seasons and gain a pre-emptive advantage in resource competition. However, it might also be reduced if phenological advances increase exposure to stresses, such as herbivores and, in colder climates, harsh abiotic conditions early in the growing season. We exposed subalpine grasslands to ~ 3 K of warming by transplanting intact turfs from 2000 m to 1400 m elevation in the eastern Swiss Alps, with turfs transplanted within the 2000 m site acting as a control. In the first growing season after transplantation, we recorded species' flowering phenology at both elevations. We also measured species' cover change for three consecutive years as a measure of plant performance. We used models to estimate species' phenological plasticity (the response of flowering time to the change in climate) and analysed its relationship with cover changes following climate change. The phenological plasticity of the 18 species in our study varied widely but was unrelated to their changes in cover. Moreover, early- and late-flowering species did not differ in their cover response to warming, nor in the relationship between cover changes and phenological plasticity. These results were replicated in a similar transplant experiment within the same subalpine community, established one year earlier and using larger turfs. We discuss the various ecological processes that can be affected by phenological shifts, and argue why the population-level consequences of these shifts are likely to be species- and context-specific. Our results highlight the importance of testing assumptions about how warming-induced changes in phenotypic traits, like phenology, impact population dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; demography; global warming; phenological shifts; phenology; phenotypic plasticity; population dynamics; transplant experiment

Year:  2019        PMID: 32001946      PMCID: PMC6992428          DOI: 10.1111/oik.06667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oikos        ISSN: 0030-1299            Impact factor:   3.903


  39 in total

Review 1.  Ecological responses to recent climate change.

Authors:  Gian-Reto Walther; Eric Post; Peter Convey; Annette Menzel; Camille Parmesan; Trevor J C Beebee; Jean-Marc Fromentin; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Franz Bairlein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate.

Authors:  A B Nicotra; O K Atkin; S P Bonser; A M Davidson; E J Finnegan; U Mathesius; P Poot; M D Purugganan; C L Richards; F Valladares; M van Kleunen
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 18.313

3.  Timing of flowering: opposed selection on different fitness components and trait covariation.

Authors:  Johan Ehrlén; Zuzana Münzbergová
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau's woods are driven by climate change.

Authors:  Charles G Willis; Brad Ruhfel; Richard B Primack; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Charles C Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Unchanged risk of frost exposure for subalpine and alpine plants after snowmelt in Switzerland despite climate warming.

Authors:  Geoffrey Klein; Martine Rebetez; Christian Rixen; Yann Vitasse
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 6.  Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity.

Authors:  Raquel A Garcia; Mar Cabeza; Carsten Rahbek; Miguel B Araújo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels.

Authors:  Stephen J Thackeray; Peter A Henrys; Deborah Hemming; James R Bell; Marc S Botham; Sarah Burthe; Pierre Helaouet; David G Johns; Ian D Jones; David I Leech; Eleanor B Mackay; Dario Massimino; Sian Atkinson; Philip J Bacon; Tom M Brereton; Laurence Carvalho; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Callan Duck; Martin Edwards; J Malcolm Elliott; Stephen J G Hall; Richard Harrington; James W Pearce-Higgins; Toke T Høye; Loeske E B Kruuk; Josephine M Pemberton; Tim H Sparks; Paul M Thompson; Ian White; Ian J Winfield; Sarah Wanless
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Earlier phenology of a nonnative plant increases impacts on native competitors.

Authors:  Jake M Alexander; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Phenological sequences reveal aggregate life history response to climatic warming.

Authors:  Eric S Post; Christian Pedersen; Christopher C Wilmers; Mads C Forchhammer
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 10.  Phenological niches and the future of invaded ecosystems with climate change.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Wolkovich; Elsa E Cleland
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.276

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mutualist- and antagonist-mediated selection contribute to trait diversification of flowers.

Authors:  Luyao Huang; Yang Liu; Liwen Dou; Shaobin Pan; Zhuangzhuang Li; Jin Zhang; Jia Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.061

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.