Literature DB >> 32001205

Is transit bipartition a better alternative to biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for superobesity? Comparison of the early results of both procedures.

Philippe Topart1, Guillaume Becouarn2, Jean-Baptiste Finel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the past years, 2 alternatives to the powerful but side-effect-prone biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) were developed: one-anastomosis duodenal switch (OADS) and sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (TB).
OBJECTIVES: To compare the 1-year results of TB and BPD-DS aiming at reducing the risk of protein malnutrition while keeping a similar weight loss for body mass index (BMI) ≥50 kg/m2.
SETTING: Private hospital, single-surgeon practice in a bariatric surgery center.
METHODS: After a change in practice in 2017, the last 71 primary BPD-DS and the first 71 TB in patients with a BMI ≥50 kg/m2 were retrospectively compared. Postoperative course, side effects, nutritional status, and need for revision and weight outcomes were reviewed. Weight was expressed as BMI, percentage of excess BMI lost, and percentage of total weight lost.
RESULTS: TB was faster to perform (92 versus 149 min, P < .0001) with a comparable 30-day complication rate of 4.3% and 5.7%. TB patients had a shorter hospital stay (2.3 ± 1 versus 4.5 ± 3.4 d, P < .0001). At 1 year, weight loss was significantly lower after TB compared with BPD-DS with percentage of excess BMI loss of 83.7 ± 12.2% versus 78.6 ± 14.7% (P = .0023). Two patients were lost to follow-up after BPD-DS and 6 after TB. Seven BPD-DS patients were treated for protein malnutrition, whereas only 2 patients had severe side effects after TB. Only 7% of the TB patients experienced >3 stools a day compared with 33% after BPD-DS (P = .016). There was no significant difference in terms of co-morbidity improvement at 1 year: 81.8% and 61.9% of patients had remission of blood hypertension, 9% and 14.3% had improvement, type 2 diabetes was in remission in 90% and 88%, and obstructive sleep apnea in 84% and 78% of the TB and BPD-DS patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although 1-year weight loss was significantly lower when BMI was ≥50, the real benefit of TB is the reduction of the side effects and protein malnutrition compared with BPD-DS. TB represents a much simpler alternative to BPD-DS for treating superobesity with less risk of major complications, but prospective studies and longer follow-up are required to confirm the maintenance of the weight loss in the long term.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch; One-anastomosis duodenal switch; Superobesity; Transit bipartition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 32001205     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  4 in total

1.  Exclusions May Be Dismissed if the Ileum Is Early and Potently Stimulated.

Authors:  Sergio Santoro; Caio Gustavo Gaspar Aquino; Filippe Camarotto Mota
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Comparing the Anti-diabetic Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy with Transit Bipartition Against Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Using a Diabetic Rodent Model.

Authors:  Pengpeng Liu; Jason Widjaja; Ponnie Robertlee Dolo; Libin Yao; Jian Hong; Yong Shao; Xiaocheng Zhu
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Sometimes the Best Solution Is Transit Bipartition: Video Case Report.

Authors:  Midhat Abu Sneineh; Se'bastien Strypstein; Bruno Dillemans
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Is One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm Effective in the Treatment of People with Severe Obesity with BMI > 50?

Authors:  Arnaud Liagre; Francesco Martini; Radwan Kassir; Gildas Juglard; Celine Hamid; Hubert Boudrie; Olivier Van Haverbeke; Laura Antolino; Tarek Debs; Niccolo Petrucciani
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.129

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.