Jaime Onofre1, Prashant Kadam2, Yoni Baert2, Ellen Goossens2. 1. Biology of the Testis, Research Laboratory for Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels 1090, Belgium. Electronic address: jaime.onofre.meza@vub.be. 2. Biology of the Testis, Research Laboratory for Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels 1090, Belgium.
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION: Which cryopreservation method better protects reproductive potential: the cryopreservation of a testicular cell suspension (TCS) or the cryopreservation of testicular tissue (TET)? DESIGN: Two cryopreservation strategies for spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) were compared in a mouse model: cryopreservation as TET or as TCS. Evaluated outcomes were number of viable cells after thawing, number and length of donor-derived colonies after spermatogonial stem cell transplantation (SSCT), number of litters, litter size and number of donor-derived pups after mating. RESULTS: Compared with cryopreserving TCS, cryopreservation of TET resulted in significantly higher numbers of viable cells after thawing (TET: 13.4 × 104 ± 7.2 × 104 versus TCS: 8.2 × 104 ± 2.7 × 104; P = 0.0002), more (TET: 47.6 ± 19.2 versus TCS: 18.5 ± 13.0; P = 0.0039) and longer (TET: 5.2 ± 1.0 mm versus TCS: 2.7 ± 1.5 mm; P = 0.0016) donor-derived colonies, and more donor-derived pups per litter (TET: 2.2 ± 0.2 versus TCS: 0.5 ± 0.1; P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Cryopreservation of TET is the preferred method to cryopreserve SSCs prior to SSCT in a mouse model.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Which cryopreservation method better protects reproductive potential: the cryopreservation of a testicular cell suspension (TCS) or the cryopreservation of testicular tissue (TET)? DESIGN: Two cryopreservation strategies for spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) were compared in a mouse model: cryopreservation as TET or as TCS. Evaluated outcomes were number of viable cells after thawing, number and length of donor-derived colonies after spermatogonial stem cell transplantation (SSCT), number of litters, litter size and number of donor-derived pups after mating. RESULTS: Compared with cryopreserving TCS, cryopreservation of TET resulted in significantly higher numbers of viable cells after thawing (TET: 13.4 × 104 ± 7.2 × 104 versus TCS: 8.2 × 104 ± 2.7 × 104; P = 0.0002), more (TET: 47.6 ± 19.2 versus TCS: 18.5 ± 13.0; P = 0.0039) and longer (TET: 5.2 ± 1.0 mm versus TCS: 2.7 ± 1.5 mm; P = 0.0016) donor-derived colonies, and more donor-derived pups per litter (TET: 2.2 ± 0.2 versus TCS: 0.5 ± 0.1; P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Cryopreservation of TET is the preferred method to cryopreserve SSCs prior to SSCT in a mouse model.
Authors: Iris Sanou; Jillis van Maaren; Jitske Eliveld; Qijing Lei; Andreas Meißner; Annemieke A de Melker; Geert Hamer; Ans M M van Pelt; Callista L Mulder Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 6.055