INTRODUCTION: Recommending both the conjugate and polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines to all U.S. seniors may have little public health impact and be economically unreasonable. Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of using both vaccines in all adults aged ≥65 years were estimated compared with an alternative strategy (omitting pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the nonimmunocompromised) and with the newly revised recommendation (giving or omitting conjugate vaccine based on patient-physician shared decision making). METHODS: Strategies were examined in hypothetical U.S. 65-year-old population cohorts and segmented into health states based on age- and population-specific data in a Markov state-transition model with a lifetime time horizon from a healthcare perspective. Black population cohorts were examined separately given greater illness risk and lower vaccine uptake. Model parameters came from the Centers for Disease Control Active Core Bacterial Surveillance network, National Health Interview Survey, and Nationwide Inpatient Sample data. Outcomes included incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained and pneumococcal disease outcomes for each strategy. Data were gathered and analysis performed in 2018. RESULTS: Giving both vaccines, either routinely or with shared decision making, was most effective, reducing pneumococcal disease incidence compared with no vaccination, but costing $765,000-$2.18 million/quality-adjusted life year gained. Depending on examined population and scenario, the alternative strategy cost $65,700-$226,700/quality-adjusted life year gained (less in black populations) and reduced cases and deaths by 0.3%-0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: A vaccination strategy that omits pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in immunocompetent U.S. seniors may be economically reasonable, particularly for black seniors. Use of both pneumococcal vaccines was more effective but substantially more expensive.
INTRODUCTION: Recommending both the conjugate and polysaccharidepneumococcal vaccines to all U.S. seniors may have little public health impact and be economically unreasonable. Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of using both vaccines in all adults aged ≥65 years were estimated compared with an alternative strategy (omitting pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the nonimmunocompromised) and with the newly revised recommendation (giving or omitting conjugate vaccine based on patient-physician shared decision making). METHODS: Strategies were examined in hypothetical U.S. 65-year-old population cohorts and segmented into health states based on age- and population-specific data in a Markov state-transition model with a lifetime time horizon from a healthcare perspective. Black population cohorts were examined separately given greater illness risk and lower vaccine uptake. Model parameters came from the Centers for Disease Control Active Core Bacterial Surveillance network, National Health Interview Survey, and Nationwide Inpatient Sample data. Outcomes included incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained and pneumococcal disease outcomes for each strategy. Data were gathered and analysis performed in 2018. RESULTS: Giving both vaccines, either routinely or with shared decision making, was most effective, reducing pneumococcal disease incidence compared with no vaccination, but costing $765,000-$2.18 million/quality-adjusted life year gained. Depending on examined population and scenario, the alternative strategy cost $65,700-$226,700/quality-adjusted life year gained (less in black populations) and reduced cases and deaths by 0.3%-0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: A vaccination strategy that omits pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in immunocompetent U.S. seniors may be economically reasonable, particularly for black seniors. Use of both pneumococcal vaccines was more effective but substantially more expensive.
Authors: Deron C Burton; Brendan Flannery; Nancy M Bennett; Monica M Farley; Ken Gershman; Lee H Harrison; Ruth Lynfield; Susan Petit; Arthur L Reingold; William Schaffner; Ann Thomas; Brian D Plikaytis; Charles E Rose; Cynthia G Whitney; Anne Schuchat Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Moe H Kyaw; Charles E Rose; Alicia M Fry; James A Singleton; Zack Moore; Elizabeth R Zell; Cynthia G Whitney Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Matthew R Moore; Ruth Link-Gelles; William Schaffner; Ruth Lynfield; Catherine Lexau; Nancy M Bennett; Susan Petit; Shelley M Zansky; Lee H Harrison; Arthur Reingold; Lisa Miller; Karen Scherzinger; Ann Thomas; Monica M Farley; Elizabeth R Zell; Thomas H Taylor; Tracy Pondo; Loren Rodgers; Lesley McGee; Bernard Beall; James H Jorgensen; Cynthia G Whitney Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: L A Jackson; P Benson; V P Sneller; J C Butler; R S Thompson; R T Chen; L S Lewis; G Carlone; F DeStefano; P Holder; T Lezhava; W W Williams Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-01-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jane E Sisk; William Whang; Jay C Butler; Vishnu-Priya Sneller; Cynthia G Whitney Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-06-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Julio A Ramirez; Timothy L Wiemken; Paula Peyrani; Forest W Arnold; Robert Kelley; William A Mattingly; Raul Nakamatsu; Senen Pena; Brian E Guinn; Stephen P Furmanek; Annuradha K Persaud; Anupama Raghuram; Francisco Fernandez; Leslie Beavin; Rahel Bosson; Rafael Fernandez-Botran; Rodrigo Cavallazzi; Jose Bordon; Claudia Valdivieso; Joann Schulte; Ruth M Carrico Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Walter W Williams; Peng-Jun Lu; Alissa O'Halloran; David K Kim; Lisa A Grohskopf; Tamara Pilishvili; Tami H Skoff; Noele P Nelson; Rafael Harpaz; Lauri E Markowitz; Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz; Amy Parker Fiebelkorn Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2017-05-05
Authors: Maria A Said; Hope L Johnson; Bareng A S Nonyane; Maria Deloria-Knoll; Katherine L O'Brien; Felipe Andreo; Bojana Beovic; Silvia Blanco; Wim G Boersma; David R Boulware; Jay C Butler; Jordi Carratalà; Feng-Yee Chang; Patrick G P Charles; Alejandro A Diaz; Jose Domínguez; Naomi Ehara; Henrik Endeman; Vicenç Falcó; Miquel Falguera; Kiyoyasu Fukushima; Carolina Garcia-Vidal; Daniel Genne; Igor A Guchev; Felix Gutierrez; Susanne S Hernes; Andy I M Hoepelman; Ulla Hohenthal; Niclas Johansson; Vitezslav Kolek; Roman S Kozlov; Tsai-Ling Lauderdale; Ivana Mareković; Mar Masiá; Matta A Matta; Òscar Miró; David R Murdoch; Eric Nuermberger; Richard Paolini; Rafael Perelló; Dominic Snijders; Vanda Plečko; Roger Sordé; Kristoffer Strålin; Menno M van der Eerden; Angel Vila-Corcoles; James P Watt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Angela R Wateska; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Hawre Jalal; Chyongchiou J Lin; Lee H Harrison; William Schaffner; Richard K Zimmerman; Kenneth J Smith Journal: Vaccine Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Kenneth J Smith; Angela R Wateska; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Chyongchiou J Lin; Lee H Harrison; William Schaffner; Richard K Zimmerman Journal: Infect Dis Ther Date: 2022-07-13
Authors: Kenneth J Smith; Angela R Wateska; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Chyongchiou J Lin; Lee H Harrison; William Schaffner; Richard K Zimmerman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 6.604