Lisa J Meltzer1, Christopher B Forrest2, Anna de la Motte3, Jodi A Mindell4,5, Katherine B Bevans6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health , Denver, Colorado. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania. 3. Applied Clinical Research Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. 4. Department of Psychology, Saint Joseph's University. 5. Sleep Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. 6. College of Public Health, Temple University , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate the validity of a self-report measure of sleep practices for youth 8-17 years. Methods: Following recommended guidelines for the development of patient reported outcomes (PROs), sleep practice concepts were identified through expert (n = 8) and child (n = 28) concept elicitation interviews and a systematic literature review. Items were developed based on these concepts and tested in cognitive interviews with children (n = 32). Psychometric analyses were applied to item response data collected from a diverse sample of youth 8-17 years (n = 307). Construct validity was evaluated through tests of associations between sleep practices and sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment. Finally, clinical validity of the tool was assessed by comparing scores of youth with and without a parent-identified sleep problem. Results: The final Pediatric Sleep Practices Questionnaire (PSPQ) included 15 items that were used to identify 5 sleep practices: sleep timing, sleep routines and consistency, technology use before bedtime, sleep environment, and the need for parental presence to fall asleep. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized structure (all factor loadings ≥ 0.72) and PSPQ indices were significantly associated with self-reported sleep disturbances and sleep-related impairment. Finally, children with parent-reported sleep problems had shorter sleep opportunity, later bedtimes, greater need for parental presence, poorer bedtime routines, and more technology use than children without parent-reported sleep problems. Conclusions: The PSPQ was developed using best-practice PRO development methodology. The PSPQ can be used in clinical settings and for research assessment to capture modifiable sleep practices that may promote or interfere with healthy sleep.
Objective: To develop and evaluate the validity of a self-report measure of sleep practices for youth 8-17 years. Methods: Following recommended guidelines for the development of patient reported outcomes (PROs), sleep practice concepts were identified through expert (n = 8) and child (n = 28) concept elicitation interviews and a systematic literature review. Items were developed based on these concepts and tested in cognitive interviews with children (n = 32). Psychometric analyses were applied to item response data collected from a diverse sample of youth 8-17 years (n = 307). Construct validity was evaluated through tests of associations between sleep practices and sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment. Finally, clinical validity of the tool was assessed by comparing scores of youth with and without a parent-identified sleep problem. Results: The final Pediatric Sleep Practices Questionnaire (PSPQ) included 15 items that were used to identify 5 sleep practices: sleep timing, sleep routines and consistency, technology use before bedtime, sleep environment, and the need for parental presence to fall asleep. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized structure (all factor loadings ≥ 0.72) and PSPQ indices were significantly associated with self-reported sleep disturbances and sleep-related impairment. Finally, children with parent-reported sleep problems had shorter sleep opportunity, later bedtimes, greater need for parental presence, poorer bedtime routines, and more technology use than children without parent-reported sleep problems. Conclusions: The PSPQ was developed using best-practice PRO development methodology. The PSPQ can be used in clinical settings and for research assessment to capture modifiable sleep practices that may promote or interfere with healthy sleep.
Authors: Timothy I Morgenthaler; Janet B Croft; Leslie C Dort; Lauren D Loeding; Janet M Mullington; Sherene M Thomas Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Leah A Irish; Christopher E Kline; Heather E Gunn; Daniel J Buysse; Martica H Hall Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Anne-Marie Chang; Daniel Aeschbach; Jeanne F Duffy; Charles A Czeisler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kate Bartel; Paul Williamson; Annette van Maanen; Jamie Cassoff; Anne Marie Meijer; Frans Oort; Bärbel Knäuper; Reut Gruber; Michael Gradisar Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Kathryn Eilene Lasch; Patrick Marquis; Marc Vigneux; Linda Abetz; Benoit Arnould; Martha Bayliss; Bruce Crawford; Kathleen Rosa Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-05-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nina Y Zhou; Amanda Nili; Courtney K Blackwell; Nonye Ogbuefi; Peter Cummings; Jin-Shei Lai; James W Griffith; Amy S Paller; Lauren S Wakschlag; Anna B Fishbein Journal: Pediatr Dermatol Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 1.997
Authors: Jessica R Lunsford-Avery; Ke Will Wang; Scott H Kollins; Richard J Chung; Casey Keller; Matthew M Engelhard Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Shosha H M Peersmann; Martha A Grootenhuis; Annemieke van Straten; Wim J E Tissing; Floor Abbink; Andrica C H de Vries; Jacqueline Loonen; Helena J H van der Pal; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Raphaële R L van Litsenburg Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 6.575