Literature DB >> 31999502

Association of Visceral Adiposity Surrogates with Impaired Fasting Glucose in Nonobese Individuals.

Hui Hua Li1,2, Jun Min Wang3, Yi Xin Ji3, Lin Lin3, Shu Wen Li3, Da Cai3, Shan Huang2, Fei Hua1, Xing Zhen Liu3.   

Abstract

Background: Nonobese individuals with disproportionate body fat distribution are also vulnerable to dysglycemia. This study aimed to evaluate the association between three visceral adiposity surrogates and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) in nonobese Chinese individuals.
Methods: A total of 70,200 nonobese adults without diabetes were included in this analysis. Two diagnostic criteria (IFG-ADA and IFG-WHO) were used to define IFG. The values of the visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product index (LAP), and cardiometabolic index (CMI) were calculated. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the association between these surrogates and IFG.
Results: Among the three indicators, only LAP and CMI were positively correlated with fasting plasma glucose (all P < 0.001). After fully adjusting for confounders, only LAP and CMI exhibited significant associations with IFG. For women, the odds ratios (ORs) for IFG-ADA in the highest quartile of the LAP and CMI were 1.967 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.645-2.353) and 1.594 (95% CI: 1.383-1.836), respectively; and were 2.025 (95% CI: 1.597-2.567) and 2.017 (95% CI: 1.647-2.470), respectively, for IFG-WHO (all P < 0.001). For men, the ORs for IFG-ADA of the LAP and CMI were 1.503 (95% CI: 1.233-1.833) and 2.045 (95% CI: 1.752-2.388), respectively; and were 1.534 (95% CI: 1.174-2.005) and 2.541 (95% CI: 2.025-3.188), respectively, for IFG-WHO (all P < 0.001). Conclusions: The LAP and CMI, cost-effective and simple visceral adiposity surrogates, are strongly associated with IFG in nonobese Chinese individuals. These surrogates might be potential targets to monitor for the recognition and management of excess visceral adiposity in nonobese individuals with prediabetes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adiposity indices; impaired fasting glucose; nonobesity; prediabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31999502     DOI: 10.1089/met.2019.0078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord        ISSN: 1540-4196            Impact factor:   1.894


  5 in total

1.  Cardiometabolic index: a new tool for screening the metabolically obese normal weight phenotype.

Authors:  X Liu; Q Wu; G Yan; J Duan; Z Chen; P Yang; N L Bragazzi; Y Lu; H Yuan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Association between visceral adiposity index and risk of prediabetes: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Rui Fang; Haicheng Han; Jidong Zhang; Kaifei Chen; Xiaoqing Fu; Qinghu He; Yong Yang
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.232

3.  The Association of Body Composition Parameters and Simultaneously Measured Inter-Arm Systolic Blood Pressure Differences.

Authors:  Serkan Yüksel; Metin Çoksevim; Murat Meriç; Mahmut Şahin
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Comparative analysis of the association between traditional and lipid-related obesity indicators and isolated systolic hypertension : Association of obesity indicators with ISH.

Authors:  Jian Dong Qian; Xiao Mei Li; Dong Shui Chen; Jian Qin Zhu; Xing Zhen Liu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Metabolic Obesity in People with Normal Body Weight (MONW)-Review of Diagnostic Criteria.

Authors:  Waldemar Pluta; Wioleta Dudzińska; Anna Lubkowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.