| Literature DB >> 31998397 |
Karina Shasri Anastasya1, Shelly Iskandar2, Nur Atik3.
Abstract
Depression is one of the major problems, and the prevalence is higher among the elderly. The underlying mechanism of depression among this set of the population is multifactorial, and one of the most important factors in the pathophysiology of depression is the level of brain serotonin. Protein deficiency is linked to tryptophan deficiency that is known to be the essential material for the synthesis of serotonin. This randomized controlled trial looked for the effectiveness of eel's head powder administration on plasma tryptophan level and geriatric depression scale (GDS) scores among the elderly population who suffered from depression. The subjects were divided into three intervention groups, including groups that were given 2-week course of 5 mg/kg BW eel's head powder, 10 mg/kg BW eel's head powder, and placebo, respectively. There was a significant difference in plasma tryptophan level and geriatric depression scale between the 10 mg/kg BW group and 5 mg/kg BW group. There was also a significant difference between those given 10 mg/kg BW eel's head powder and those receiving placebo; however, no such difference was found between those in the 5 mg/kg BW eel's head powder group and placebo group. Eel's head powder administration could increase plasma tryptophan level and reduce geriatric depression scale score among older individuals who suffered from depression. Administration of 10 mg/kg BW eel's head powder was significant in increasing plasma tryptophan level and reducing GDS score.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31998397 PMCID: PMC6969986 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4658514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Normality test result.
| Variables | Group |
| Data distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest plasma tryptophan level | Overall | 0.067 | Normal |
| Posttest plasma tryptophan level | Overall | 0.495 | Normal |
| Pretest GDS | Overall | 0.004 | Nonnormal |
| Posttest GDS | Overall | 0.017 | Nonnormal |
| Pretest plasma tryptophan level | 10 mg | 0.492 | Normal |
| Posttest plasma tryptophan level | 10 mg | 0.871 | Normal |
| Pretest GDS | 10 mg | 0.158 | Normal |
| Posttest GDS | 10 mg | 0.009 | Nonnormal |
| Pretest plasma tryptophan level | 5 mg | 0.174 | Normal |
| Posttest plasma tryptophan level | 5 mg | 0.795 | Normal |
| Pretest GDS | 5 mg | 0.205 | Normal |
| Posttest GDS | 5 mg | 0.107 | Normal |
| Pretest plasma tryptophan level | Placebo | 0.132 | Normal |
| Posttest plasma tryptophan level | Placebo | 0.213 | Normal |
| Pretest GDS | Placebo | 0.042 | Nonnormal |
| Posttest GDS | Placebo | 0.108 | Normal |
p value was calculated based on Saphiro–Wilk test; the p value of >0.05 reflects normal data distribution, while the p value of <0.05 is considered as nonnormally distributed data.
Comparison between pre- and postintervention plasma tryptophan level and GDS between the 10 mg/kg BW eel's head powder group, 5 mg/kg BW eel's head powder group, and placebo group.
| Variables | Groups |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mg/kg | 5 mg/kg BW | Placebo | ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| Mean ± SD | 6.80 ± 1.78 | 6.75 ± 2.43 | 7.79 ± 2.38 |
|
| Range (min–max) | 4.30–10.81 | 3.63–10.75 | 4.41–13.67 | |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Mean ± SD | 8.66 ± 0.93 | 7.23 ± 1.95 | 6.64 ± 1.37 |
|
| Range (min–max) | 7.10–10.39 | 4.27–10.84 | 4.98–8.93 | |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Mean ± SD | 6.90 ± 1.375 | 7.00 ± 1.519 | 7.00 ± 1.897 |
|
| Range (min-max) | 5.00–9.00 | 5.00–10.00 | 5.00–10.00 | |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Mean ± SD | 5.72 ± 0.78 | 6.85 ± 1.29 | 7.36 ± 1.50 |
|
| Range (min–max) | 5.00–7.00 | 4.00–9.00 | 5.00–9.00 | |
For continuous variables, data were analysed using one-way ANOVA test if the distribution was normal and had homogenous variants, and Kruskal–Wallis test was used for nonnormally distributed data. The p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistically significant p value of <0.05.
Comparison between pre- and postintervention plasma tryptophan level and GDS score among intervention in patients receiving 10 mg/kg BW eel's head powder.
| Variables | Groups |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | Posttest | ||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 6.80 ± 1.78 | 8.66 ± 0.94 |
|
| Range (min–max) | 4.30–10.81 | 7.10–10.39 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 6.90 ± 1.38 | 5.72 ± 0.79 |
|
| Range (min–max) | 5.00–9.00 | 5.00–7.00 | |
For continuous data, the p value was obtained from dependent Student's t-test if the data distribution was normal, and alternatively Wilcoxon test was used for nonnormally distributed data. p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistically significant p value of <0.05.
Comparison between pre- and postintervention plasma tryptophan level and GDS score among intervention in patients receiving 5 mg/kg BW eel's head powder.
| Variables | Groups |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | Posttest | ||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 6.75 ± 2.44 | 7.23 ± 1.96 |
|
| Range (min-max) | 3.63–10.75 | 4.27–10.84 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 7.00 ± 1.519 mcg/ml | 6.85 ± 1.292 mcg/ml |
|
| Range (min-max) | 5.00–10.00 | 4.00–9.00 | |
For continuous data, the p value was obtained from dependent Student's t-test if the data distribution was normal, and alternatively Wilcoxon test was used for nonnormally distributed data. p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Comparison between pre- and postintervention plasma tryptophan level and GDS score among intervention in patients receiving placebo.
| Variables | Groups |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | Posttest | ||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 7.79 ± 2.39 | 6.64 ± 1.37 |
|
| Range (min-max) | 4.41–13.67 | 4.98–8.93 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 7.00 ± 1.90 | 7.36 ± 1.50 |
|
| Range (min-max) | 5.00–10.00 | 5.00–9.00 | |
For continuous data, the p value was obtained from dependent Student's t-test if the data distribution was normal, and alternatively Wilcoxon test was used for nonnormally distributed data. p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 1Correlation between postintervention plasma tryptophan level and GDS.
Table of correlation analysis of postintervention tryptophan plasma level and GDS.
| Variables | Correlation |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation of postintervention plasma tryptophan level |
| − |
|
p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistically significant p value of <0.05. R: correlation coefficient.