| Literature DB >> 31998283 |
Lívia Pimentel de Sant'Ana1, Dalila Juliana S Ribeiro1, Aline Maria Araújo Martins2, Fábio Neves Dos Santos3, Rafael Corrêa1, Raquel das Neves Almeida1, Marcos Nogueira Eberlin4, Corinne F Maurice5, Kelly Grace Magalhães1.
Abstract
Obesity is a chronic disease with rising worldwide prevalence and largely associated with several other comorbidities, such as cancer, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and metabolic syndrome. Hepatic steatosis, a hallmark of NAFLD, is strongly correlated with obesity and has been correlated with changes in the gut microbiota, which can promote its development through the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that regulate insulin resistance, bile acid, choline metabolism, and inflammation. Recent studies have suggested a controversial role for the inflammasome/caspase-1 in the development of obesity and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Here, we evaluated the role of inflammasome NLRP3 and caspases 1/11 in the establishment of obesity and hepatic steatosis in diet-induced obese mice, correlating them with the global lipid profile of the liver and gut microbiota diversity. After feeding wild-type, caspases 1/11, and NLRP3 knockout mice with a standard fat diet (SFD) or a high-fat diet (HFD), we found that the caspases 1/11 knockout mice, but not NLRP3 knockout mice, were more susceptible to HFD-induced obesity, and developed enhanced hepatic steatosis even under SFD conditions. Lipidomics analysis of the liver, assessed by MALDI-MS analysis, revealed that the HFD triggered a significant change in global lipid profile in the liver of WT mice compared to those fed an SFD, and this profile was modified by the lack of caspases 1/11 and NLRP3. The absence of caspases 1/11 was also correlated with an increased presence of triacylglycerol in the liver. Gut microbial diversity analysis, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, showed that there was also an increase of Proteobacteria and a higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the gut of caspases 1/11 knockout mice fed an HFD. Overall, mice without caspases 1/11 harbored gut bacterial phyla involved with weight gain, obesity, and hepatic steatosis. Taken together, our data suggest an important role for caspases 1/11 in the lipid composition of the liver and in the modulation of the gut microbial community composition. Our results further suggest that HFD-induced obesity and the absence of caspases 1/11 may regulate both lipid metabolism and gut microbial diversity, and therefore may be associated with NAFLD and obesity.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; gut microbiota; high-fat diet; inflammasome; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31998283 PMCID: PMC6962112 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Establishment of high-fat-diet-induced obesity. WT, caspase-1/11−/− and Nlpr3−/− mice were fed SFD (17% fat) or HFD (45% fat) for 90 days. The weight gain curve was fitted with the weekly weighing of the animals (A,C). Weight of the animals at the final of treatment (B,D) and abdominal fat (E). ANOVA test was applied, the bars representing confidence interval of 95% (****p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Weight of organs and hepatic steatosis development. WT, caspase-1/1−/− and Nlpr3−/− mice were fed SFD (17% fat) or HFD (45% fat) for 90 days; after treatment, the liver was collected. Weight of liver (A,B) and hematoxylin and eosin staining of the liver (C) after treatment. Hepatic steatosis scores (D,E) were determined with semi-quantitative pathological standards. ANOVA test was applied, the bars representing confidence interval of 95% (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005, and ****p < 0.0001).
Figure 3MS/MS analysis of lipid composition in the liver. Heat map, with a color-code thermometer indicating the relative concentrations of metabolites on each group: WT, caspase-1/11−/−, and Nlpr3−/− mice fed SFD (17% fat) or HFD (45% fat) for 90 days. Maps show the lipidomic profiles of SFD (A) and HFD (B) groups. Orthogonal partial least squares–discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) score plots model was constructed using MALDI lipid profiles. Each of the five animals in each group gave rise to three samples. Plots show the lipidomic profiles animals fed with SFD (C) or HFD (D). Variable importance in projection (VIP) plot identified by partial least squares–discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) displaying the top 10 most important features in mice fed with SFD (E) or HFD (F).
Figure 4β-diversity of gut microbiota. Distance boxplots weighted_unifrac (A) and unweighted unifrac (B): I—All within the description, II—All between description, III—caspase-1/11−/− SFD vs. caspase-1/11−/− SFD, IV—caspase-1/11−/− HFD vs. caspase-1/11−/− HFD, and V—caspase-1/11−/− SFD vs. caspase-1/11−/− HFD. (C) PCoA plot weighted_unifrac and (D) PCoA plot unweighted_unifrac, blue: caspase-1/11−/−SFD, red: caspase-1/11−/− HFD. Distance boxplots weighted_unifrac (E) and unweighted unifrac (F): I—All within the description, II—All between description, III—caspase-1/11−/− HFD vs. caspase-1/11−/− HFD, IV—WT HFD vs. WT HFD, and V—caspase-1/11−/− HFD vs. WT HFD. (G) PCoA plot weighted_unifrac and (H) PCoA plot unweighted_unifrac, purple: WT HFD, red: caspase-1/11−/− HFD. The tests of significance were performed using a two-sided Student's two-sample t test, the non-parametric p-values were calculated with Bonferroni correction. p-values for comparisons of Distance boxplots (A): I vs. II p = 0.09, I vs. III p = 1, I vs. VI p = 1, I vs. V p = 0.05, II vs. III p = 0.07, II vs. IV p = 0.6, II vs. V p = 1, III vs. IV p = 1, III vs. V p = 0.12, and IV vs. V p = 0.54; (B): I vs. II p = 0.01, I vs. III p = 0.39, I vs. VI p = 0.89, I vs. V p = 0.01, II vs. III p = 0.01, II vs. IV p = 1, II vs. V p = 1, III vs. IV p = 0.03, III vs. V p = 0.01, and IV vs. V p = 1; (E): I vs. II p = 0.010, I vs. III p = 1, I vs. VI p = 1, I vs. V p = 0.01, II vs. III p = 0.1, II vs. IV p = 0.01, II vs. V p = 1, III vs. IV p = 1, III vs. V p = 0.15, and IV vs. V p = 0.01; (F): I vs. II p = 0.01, I vs. III p = 1, I vs. VI p = 1, I vs. V p = 0.01, II vs. III p = 0.01, II vs. IV p = 0.01, II vs. V p = 1, III vs. IV p = 1, III vs. V p = 0.01, and IV vs. V p = 0.01.
Figure 5Taxonomic analysis of the gut microbiota. WT and caspase-1/11−/− mice were fed a SFD (17% fat) or a HFD (45% fat) for 90 days. Feces from all groups were collected and 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the V4 region was performed on the Illumina HiSeq platform to characterize the distal gut microbiota. Bar charts represent the relative abundance of bacterial (A,B) phyla and (C,D) families in all mice according to their diet and genotype (n = 481 samples). Differences in the abundance of a subset of bacterial families related to NAFLD found in the gut of Caspases 1-11−/− mice, according to their diet (E–J). Significance was obtained with a t test for each bacterial taxa, the bars represent confidence interval of 95% (*p < 0.05).