| Literature DB >> 31998139 |
Violetta Borelli1, Monica Martinelli2, Stefania Luppi2, Francesca Vita1, Federico Romano2, Francesco Fanfani3, Elisa Trevisan1, Fulvio Celsi1, Giuliano Zabucchi1, Fabrizio Zanconati4, Cristina Bottin4, Giuseppe Ricci2,4.
Abstract
Endometriosis is a local pelvic inflammatory process, frequently associated with infertility, with altered function of immune-related cells in the peritoneal environment. Mast cells are known to be key players of the immune system and have been recently involved in endometriosis and in infertility, with their mediators directly suppressing sperm motility. In this study, we evaluated the mast cell population and their mediators in the peritoneal fluid of infertile patients with endometriosis and their impact on human sperm motility. Peritoneal fluids, collected by laparoscopy from 11 infertile patients with endometriosis and 9 fertile controls were evaluated for the presence of mast cells, tryptase levels and their effect on sperm motility. Furthermore, an in vitro model of mast cells-sperm interaction in peritoneal fluid was set up, using LAD2 cell line as a mast cell model, and analyzed from a functional as well as a morphological point of view. Mast cell peritoneal fluid population and its main mediator, tryptase, is more represented in endometriosis confirming an involvement of these cells in this disease. Anyway it appears unlikely that tryptase enriched peritoneal fluid, which fails to inhibit sperm motility, could contribute to endometriosis associated infertility. Despite of this, sperm interaction with the mast cell surface (LAD2) induced a significantly mast cell-degranulation response in the peritoneal fluid from endometriosis which could directly modulate sperm function other than motility. This evidence lead us to suppose that there is, between these elements, an interrelationship which deserves further studies.Entities:
Keywords: endometriosis; infertility; mast cells; sperm; tryptase
Year: 2020 PMID: 31998139 PMCID: PMC6964357 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 2Representative images of immunohistochemical analysis for tryptase on cell blocks’ sections. (a) Two tryptase positive cells (from the EMS study group) (arrows). (b) Negative control (primary antibody omitted). LAD2 cells in (c) represent a positive maker control for tryptase, in (d) the negative control (primary antibody omitted) is shown. Original magnification 1,000×. Scale bars = 10 μm.
FIGURE 3Sperm viability (mean % + SE) after swim-up (T0), after 3 and 24 h incubation in HTF medium (HTFM), peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis (PF-EMS) and from controls (PF-C). T0 vs. HTFM 3 h: p = 0.9271; T0 vs. PF-EMS 3 h: p = 0.2077; T0 vs. PF-C 3 h p = 0.7543; T0 vs. HFTM 24 p = 0.0083; T0 vs. PF-EMS 24 h p = 0.0386; T0 vs. PF-C 24 h p = 0.0061. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in the study group: infertile women with endometriosis (EMS, N = 11) and control group: fertile women without EMS (C, N = 9).
| Control (C) group ( | 38.4 ± 6.1 | 7.9 ± 2.3 | 58.1 ± 8.9 | 30.3 ± 6.3 | 4,8 ± 0.9 | 3.9 ± 2.5 | 0.87 ± 0.35 |
| Study (EMS) group ( | 32.3 ± 4.9 | 6.6 ± 0.9 | 54.0 ± 6.6 | 34.2 ± 5.9 | 6.5 ± 2.4 | 3.0 ± 1.3 | 0.54 ± 0.23 |
| Statistical analysis | |||||||
Cytological peritoneal fluid characterization in the study and control group.
| Control (C) Group ( | 8.7 ± 3.5 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 73.0 ± 10.4 | 16.0 ± 8.5 | 8.6 ± 4.5 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 0.5 ± 0.5 |
| Study (EMS) Group ( | 10.1 ± 5.7 | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 56.3 ± 13.4 | 14.1 ± 10.0 | 24.6 ± 7.0 | 2.5 ± 3.8 | 2.5 ± 5.6 | 2.8 ± 3.2 |
| Statistical Analysis | ||||||||
FIGURE 1Representative images of cytocentrifuged smears of PF (EMS) stained with Diff-Quick (a) and with Toluidin blue (TB) (b). Mast cells/basophils are indicated by the arrows. Original magnification 1,000×. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Biochemical characterization of the peritoneal fluid in the study and control group.
| Protein concentration (mg/ml) | 1.21 ± 0.04 | 1.19 ± 0.06 | |
| β-hexosaminidase enzyme activity (AU/ml) | 5.9 ± 1.3 | 6.5 ± 1.3 | |
| Tryptase enzyme activity (AU/ml) | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 4.2 ± 1.2 | |
| Tryptase concentration (ng/ml) | 12.3 ± 2.3 | 16.4 ± 3.9 |
FIGURE 4Total (A) and progressive (B) sperm motility (mean % ± SE) after swim-up (T0 starting condition), after 3 and 24 h incubation in HTF medium alone (HTFM), peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis (PF-EMS) and from controls (PF-C). In (A) T0 vs. HTFM 3 h: p = 0.4617; T0 vs. PF-EMS 3 h: p = 0.0642; T0 vs. PF-C 3 h p = 0.0058; T0 vs. HFTM 24 h p < 0.0001; T0 vs. PF-EMS 24 h p < 0.0001; T0 vs. PF-C 24 h < 0.0001. In (B) T0 vs. HTFM 3 h: p = 0.0133; T0 vs. PF-EMS 3 h: p = 0.0043; T0 vs. PF-C 3 h p = 0.0027; T0 vs. HFTM 24 p < 0.0001; T0 vs. PF-EMS 24 h p < 0.0001; T0 vs. PF-C 24 h p < 0.0001. In both figures ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 5LAD2-sperm interaction evaluated by SEM analysis. (a) represents the LAD2-sperm interaction in the presence of PF-C. At least four tail-LAD interactions are apparent with three LAD, while only one head-LAD interaction can be seen (arrow). (b) is representative of LAD2-sperm interaction in the presence of PF-EMS, two sperms in contact with one LAD2 are visible (arrow). (c) and inset shows two intimate HM interactions between sperm and LAD surface in the presence of PF-EMS. In both cases, extracellular secretion can be seen, as either massive extrusion [arrow in (c)] or single granule secretion [inset in (c)]. Magnification bars: in (a,b) = 3 μm, in (c) = 1 μm and in the inset of (c) = 3 μm.
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of LAD2-sperm interaction.
| PF-C | 100 | 719 | 8.8 ± 0.50 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.3 |
| PF-EMS | 120 | 646 | 7.3 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| Statistical analysis |
Secretory response of LAD2 induced by sperm interaction.
| Resting LAD2 | 4.2 ± 0.9 | 5 | |
| LAD2+sperm | 6.3 ± 0.7 | 3 | [1] vs. [2]: |
| LAD2+sperm in PF-C | 7.0 ± 2.0 | 3 | [2] vs. [3]: |
| LAD2+sperm in PF-EMS | 16.7 ± 2.5 | 3 | [2] vs. [4]: |
| LAD2+48/80 | 17.4 ± 2.1 | 3 | [1] vs. [5]: |