Maria Pia Giannoccaro1,2, Giombattista Sallemi1, Rocco Liguori1,2, Giuseppe Plazzi1,2, Fabio Pizza3,4. 1. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Ospedale Bellaria, Padiglione G, piano 1, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy. 2. IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 3. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Ospedale Bellaria, Padiglione G, piano 1, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy. fpizza@gmail.com. 4. IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. fpizza@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a chronic and disabling sleep disorder due to the loss of hypocretinergic neurons in the lateral hypothalamus pathophysiologically linked to an autoimmune process. Current treatment is symptomatic, and no cure is available to date. Immunotherapy is considered a promising future therapeutic option, and this review discusses the rationale for immunotherapy in narcolepsy, current evidences of its effects, outcome measures, and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: A limited number of case reports and uncontrolled small case series have reported the effect of different immunotherapies in patients with NT1. These studies were mainly based on the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVig), followed by corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and monoclonal antibodies. Although initial reports showed an improvement of symptoms, particularly when patients were treated close to disease onset, other observations have not confirmed these results. Inadequate timing of treatment, placebo effects, and spontaneous improvement due to the natural disease course can account for these contrasting findings. Moreover, clear endpoints and standardized outcome measures have not been used and are currently missing in the pediatric population. On the basis of the available data, there are no enough evidences to support the use of immunotherapy in NT1. Randomized, controlled studies using clear endpoints and new outcome measures are needed to achieve a definitive answer about the usefulness of these treatments in narcolepsy.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a chronic and disabling sleep disorder due to the loss of hypocretinergic neurons in the lateral hypothalamus pathophysiologically linked to an autoimmune process. Current treatment is symptomatic, and no cure is available to date. Immunotherapy is considered a promising future therapeutic option, and this review discusses the rationale for immunotherapy in narcolepsy, current evidences of its effects, outcome measures, and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: A limited number of case reports and uncontrolled small case series have reported the effect of different immunotherapies in patients with NT1. These studies were mainly based on the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVig), followed by corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and monoclonal antibodies. Although initial reports showed an improvement of symptoms, particularly when patients were treated close to disease onset, other observations have not confirmed these results. Inadequate timing of treatment, placebo effects, and spontaneous improvement due to the natural disease course can account for these contrasting findings. Moreover, clear endpoints and standardized outcome measures have not been used and are currently missing in the pediatric population. On the basis of the available data, there are no enough evidences to support the use of immunotherapy in NT1. Randomized, controlled studies using clear endpoints and new outcome measures are needed to achieve a definitive answer about the usefulness of these treatments in narcolepsy.
Authors: Rosa Peraita-Adrados; Julia Romero-Martínez; Juan A Guzmán-De Villoria; Laura Lillo-Triguero; María Luisa Martínez-Ginés Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Mehdi Tafti; Gert J Lammers; Yves Dauvilliers; Sebastiaan Overeem; Geert Mayer; Jacek Nowak; Corinne Pfister; Valérie Dubois; Jean-François Eliaou; Hans-Peter Eberhard; Roland Liblau; Aleksandra Wierzbicka; Peter Geisler; Claudio L Bassetti; Johannes Mathis; Michel Lecendreux; Ramin Khatami; Raphaël Heinzer; José Haba-Rubio; Eva Feketeova; Christian R Baumann; Zoltán Kutalik; Jean-Marie Tiercy Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: J Hara; C T Beuckmann; T Nambu; J T Willie; R M Chemelli; C M Sinton; F Sugiyama; K Yagami; K Goto; M Yanagisawa; T Sakurai Journal: Neuron Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Markku Partinen; Outi Saarenpää-Heikkilä; Ismo Ilveskoski; Christer Hublin; Miika Linna; Päivi Olsén; Pekka Nokelainen; Reija Alén; Tiina Wallden; Merimaaria Espo; Harri Rusanen; Jan Olme; Heli Sätilä; Harri Arikka; Pekka Kaipainen; Ilkka Julkunen; Turkka Kirjavainen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Iris-Katharina Penner; Eva Catharina Sivertsdotter; Elisabeth G Celius; Siegrid Fuchs; Karen Schreiber; Sara Berkö; Anders Svenningsson Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 4.003