Literature DB >> 31996998

[Treatment success of canaloplasty and trabeculectomy by the same surgeon with the same level of experience in the long-term course].

Lina Nassri1, Niklas Plange2, Friederike Lindemann2, Hannah Schellhase2, Peter Walter2, David Kuerten2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trabeculectomy (TE) with the use of antimetabolites is the standard procedure in glaucoma surgery, whereas canaloplasty (CP) is a nonpenetrating and potentially less invasive alternative.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective case series was to compare the long-term success of CP and TE under the same conditions and with the same levels of experience of the surgeon as well as to investigate whether preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and postoperative IOP correlate with eachother.
METHODS: The study included 57 eyes that underwent either CP or TE (CP n = 27; male = 50.0% age 60.7 ± 13.2 years; TE n = 30; male = 55.6% age 68.0 ± 9.1 years). Each of the procedures was performed by the same surgeon with comparable levels of experience. The comparison included preoperative and postoperative visual field damage, preoperative and postoperative IOP (mm Hg) after 1 and 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months as well as in the long-term course (1-3 years) and the necessary local treatment at the corresponding times.
RESULTS: With both methods no worsening of the visual field could be detected and the patient groups showed comparable preoperative and postoperative mean deviations (MD). The CP showed a positive correlation between preoperative and postoperative 1‑year IOP (r = 0.4; p = 0.022), whereas TE showed no significant correlation between preoperative and postoperative IOP. The count of local antiglaucoma medication in long-term comparison (1-3 years after surgery) was higher after CP than after TE (1.5 ± 1.6 vs. 0.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.003). In both groups there were no severe postoperative complications. The overall success rates (without treatment) were higher at all time points after TE. DISCUSSION: With both methods conducted by the same surgeon with the same levels of experience, an effective reduction of the IOP was achieved. It seems that the higher the preoperative IOP before CP, the higher the achievable pressure after 1 year and in the long term. In contrast, after TE the IOP was effectively reduced in the long term regardless of the initial IOP. The CP seems to be inferior to TE under the same conditions with respect to complete surgical success (without local treatment).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canaloplasty; Glaucoma surgery; Longterm outcome; One surgeon; Trabeculectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31996998     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-020-01045-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of canaloplasty and trabeculectomy for open angle glaucoma: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhong-Jing Lin; Shuo Xu; Shou-Yue Huang; Xiao-Bin Zhang; Yi-Sheng Zhong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Glaucoma filtration surgery and antimetabolites.

Authors:  C Mattox
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  A System Review and Meta-Analysis of Canaloplasty Outcomes in Glaucoma Treatment in Comparison with Trabeculectomy.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Jie Kang; Xiaoming Chen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 1.909

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Is canaloplasty with mitomycin c a safe procedure in myopic glaucoma?

Authors:  Vivienne Dooling; Alexandra Lappas; Thomas Stefan Dietlein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.535

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.