| Literature DB >> 31996423 |
Kaicen Wang1,2,3, Longxian Lv1,2,3, Ren Yan1,2,3, Qiangqiang Wang1,2,3, Huiyong Jiang1,2,3, Wenrui Wu1,2,3, Yating Li1,2,3, Jianzhong Ye1,2,3, Jingjing Wu1,2,3, Liya Yang1,2,3, Xiaoyuan Bian1,2,3, Xianwan Jiang1,2,3, Yanmeng Lu1,2,3, Jiaojiao Xie1,2,3, Qing Wang1,2,3, Jian Shen1,2,3, Lanjuan Li4,2,3.
Abstract
Acute liver failure is a severe liver disorder that poses considerable global challenges. Previous studies on Bifidobacterium longum R0175 have mainly focused on its psychotropic functions. The current research focused on the protective efficacy of B. longum R0175 against acute liver failure caused by d-galactosamine (d-GalN) in rats and further tested the hypothesis that B. longum R0175 exerted liver-protective effects by affecting the intestinal microbiota and fecal metabolites and by inhibiting inflammation. We found that oral gavage of B. longum R0175 markedly reduced the severity of liver injury in d-GalN-treated rats, as evidenced by decreased serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bile acids (TBAs) (P < 0.05). Moreover, the plasma concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin 1β [IL-1β] and tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α]) and chemokines (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF], macrophage chemoattractant protein 1 [MCP-1], chemokine [C-X-C motif] ligand 1 [CXCL1], chemokine [C-C motif] ligand 5 [CCL5], and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α [MIP-1α]) were also markedly reduced (P < 0.05). Pretreatment with B. longum R0175 partially reversed the gut microbiota dysbiosis in rats with liver injury by increasing the relative abundances of potentially beneficial bacteria, such as Alloprevotella spp., and decreasing the relative abundances of potentially harmful bacteria, such as Acetatifactor muris, Butyricimonas spp., and Oscillibacter spp. Furthermore, B. longum R0175 administration partially improved the metabolic function of the intestinal microbes, as indicated by the decreased level of lithocholic acid found in the feces.IMPORTANCE Our research investigated the protective and preventive roles of B. longum R0175 in a rat model of acute liver failure. The results illustrated that this probiotic strain exhibited protective effects in rats with acute liver failure. Thus, B. longum R0175 showed clinical application prospects that required further exploration.Entities:
Keywords: Bifidobacterium longum R0175; acute liver failure; metabolome; microbiome; probiotic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31996423 PMCID: PMC6992372 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00791-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
FIG 1B. longum R0175 administration alleviated d-GalN-induced acute liver injury. (a) Left, representative images of the hepatic histology; right, HAI scores of the liver histopathology. (b) Liver function indexes. HAI scores are given as the median with the interquartile range, and the liver function data are given as the mean ± SEM. Each dot represents one sample (n = 6 per group). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; NS, no significant difference, compared with the PC group.
FIG 2Treatment with B. longum R0175 ameliorated the intestinal mucosal damage. (a) Left, representative images of the terminal ileum histology; right, terminal ileum histopathologic scores. (b) The ultrastructure of the ileal villi observed by SEM. (c) The ultrastructure of the ileal microvilli observed by SEM. Ileum score represents the histological score of the terminal ileum and is given as the median with the interquartile range. Each dot represents one sample (n = 6 per group). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001, compared with the PC group.
Effects of B. longum R0175 on plasma inflammatory cytokine levels
| Inflammatory cytokine | Cytokine concn (pg/ml) in group: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | R0175 | |
| TNF-α | 16.00 ± 0.00** | 105.69 ± 14.39 | 53.71 ± 20.62* |
| IFN-γ | 8.43 ± 4.43 | 34.07 ± 10.70 | 44.81 ± 24.41 |
| IL-1α | 4.34 ± 1.14** | 19.88 ± 3.23 | 30.15 ± 8.91 |
| IL-1β | 23.19 ± 16.08*** | 307.29 ± 50.00 | 60.91 ± 21.95** |
| IL-2 | 8.00 ± 0.00** | 459.13 ± 95.87 | 224.42 ± 115.60 |
| IL-4 | 2.16 ± 1.03* | 6.76 ± 1.01 | 12.06 ± 3.58 |
| IL-5 | 17.55 ± 11.55** | 532.78 ± 300.02 | 106.41 ± 14.12 |
| IL-6 | 15.72 ± 2.72** | 66.06 ± 24.79 | 64.10 ± 34.50 |
| IL-7 | 20.81 ± 15.10** | 293.63 ± 62.24 | 50.93 ± 23.26** |
| IL-10 | 5.92 ± 1.92*** | 33.92 ± 3.44 | 28.68 ± 5.69 |
| IL-12 | 7.11 ± 3.11** | 22.99 ± 2.27 | 31.32 ± 13.81 |
| IL-13 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 12.40 ± 8.46 | 12.82 ± 10.82 |
| IL-17α | 2.42 ± 1.42** | 9.92 ± 0.77 | 14.12 ± 2.99 |
| IL-18 | 182.13 ± 82.33** | 746.86 ± 121.57 | 1158.89 ± 304.78 |
| G-CSF | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.07 ± 0.14 | 1.52 ± 0.35 |
| GM-CSF | 25.80 ± 18.45*** | 260.05 ± 38.53 | 52.75 ± 24.35** |
| CXCL1 | 10.29 ± 5.10*** | 77.85 ± 4.66 | 29.80 ± 6.87*** |
| M-CSF | 2.28 ± 0.27** | 5.17 ± 0.54 | 6.71 ± 1.15 |
| MCP-1 | 241.97 ± 45.42*** | 1120.27 ± 72.96 | 659.22 ± 46.04*** |
| MIP-1α | 6.27 ± 2.86** | 342.75 ± 203.86 | 50.79 ± 11.26** |
| MIP-3α | 3.08 ± 0.40** | 11.29 ± 2.03 | 7.74 ± 0.77 |
| CCL5 | 34.67 ± 2.36*** | 74.14 ± 3.82 | 59.01 ± 6.04* |
| VEGF | 18.64 ± 12.18*** | 123.83 ± 7.65 | 51.07 ± 20.87** |
Data are shown as the mean ± SEM; *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001 compared with the PC group.
FIG 3Pretreatment with B. longum R0175 relieved gut microbiome dysbiosis. (a) The violin figures show α-diversity indexes (Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) of the gut microbiota between the three groups. (b) The PCoA plot shows the β diversity of the gut microbiota between the three groups based on the unweighted UniFrac metric. The α-diversity indexes are given as the median with the interquartile range; NS indicates no significant difference.
Cage effects on gut microbiota in each group
| Group | Data by comparison | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PERMANOVA | ANOSIM | |||
| pseudo-F | ||||
| NC-1 vs NC-2 | 1.35 | 0.105 | 0.74 | 0.107 |
| PC-1 vs PC-2 | 1.66 | 0.101 | 0.91 | 0.112 |
| R0175-1 vs R0175-2 | 1.27 | 0.104 | 0.44 | 0.116 |
FIG 4B. longum R0175 administration alleviated microbiome dysbiosis. (a) LEfSe cladograms representing taxa enriched in the NC and PC groups. (b) Discriminative biomarkers with an LDA score of >2.5 or <−2.5 in the PC and NC groups. (c) LEfSe cladograms representing taxa enriched in the PC and R0175 groups. (d) Discriminative biomarkers with an LDA score of >2.5 or <−2.5 in the R0175 and PC groups. Rings in the LEfSe cladograms from the inside out represent taxonomic levels from phylum to genus. The sizes of circles indicate the relative abundances of the taxa.
FIG 5Oral gavage of B. longum R0175 mitigated the changes in the metabolomic profile. (a and b) OPLS-DA plot comparing the NC and PC groups (a) and the PC and R0175 groups (b). Each dot represents one sample. (c and d) The bar charts show metabolites with a VIP value of >1 between the NC and PC groups (c) and between the PC and R0175 groups (d). The asterisk above the bar indicates the P value, as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. cum, cumulative.
FIG 6Metabolic biomarkers selected from the S-plot. (a and b) Metabolic biomarkers between the NC and PC groups (a) and between the PC and R0175 groups (b).
FIG 7Heat map of the Spearman’s rank correlation analysis of the representative microbes, metabolic biomarkers, liver injury parameters, and inflammatory indexes among the three groups. Color key and circle size indicate the association strength. Dark red indicates a stronger positive correlation, dark blue indicates a stronger negative correlation, and white indicates no correlation. The asterisk in the dot indicates the P value, as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.