J K Pine1, B Haugk2, S M Robinson3, A Darne2, C Wilson3, G Sen3, J J French3, S A White3, D M Manas3, R M Charnley3. 1. Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. Electronic address: james.pine@nhs.net. 2. Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. 3. Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical resection remains the only curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The prognostic value of resection margin status following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial. Standardised pathological assessment increases positive margins but limited data is available on the significance of involved margins. We investigated the impact of resection margin status in PDAC on patient outcome. METHOD: We identified all patients with PD for PDAC at one pancreatic cancer centre between August 2008 and December 2014. Demographic, operative, adjuvant therapeutic and survival data was obtained. Pathology data including resection margin status of specific anatomic margins was collected and analysed. RESULTS: 107 patients were included, all pathologically staged as T3 with 102 N1. 87.9% of patients were R1 of which 53.3% showed direct extension to the resection margin. Median survival for R0 patients versus R1<1 mm and R1 = 0 mm was 28.4 versus 15.4 and 25.1 versus 13.4 months. R1 = 0 mm status remained a predictor of poor outcome on multivariate analysis. Evaluation of individual margins (R1<1 mm) showed the SMV and SMA margins were associated with poorer overall survival. Multiple involved margins impacted negatively on outcome. SMA margin patient outcome with R1 = 1-1.9 mm was similar to R1=>2 mm. CONCLUSION: Using an R1 definition of <1 mm and standardised pathology we demonstrate that R1 rates in PDAC can approach 90%. R1 = 0 mm remained an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Using R1<1 mm we have shown that involvement of medial margins and multiple margins has significant negative impact on overall survival. We conclude that not all margin positivity has the same prognostic significance. Crown
BACKGROUND: Surgical resection remains the only curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The prognostic value of resection margin status following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial. Standardised pathological assessment increases positive margins but limited data is available on the significance of involved margins. We investigated the impact of resection margin status in PDAC on patient outcome. METHOD: We identified all patients with PD for PDAC at one pancreatic cancer centre between August 2008 and December 2014. Demographic, operative, adjuvant therapeutic and survival data was obtained. Pathology data including resection margin status of specific anatomic margins was collected and analysed. RESULTS: 107 patients were included, all pathologically staged as T3 with 102 N1. 87.9% of patients were R1 of which 53.3% showed direct extension to the resection margin. Median survival for R0 patients versus R1<1 mm and R1 = 0 mm was 28.4 versus 15.4 and 25.1 versus 13.4 months. R1 = 0 mm status remained a predictor of poor outcome on multivariate analysis. Evaluation of individual margins (R1<1 mm) showed the SMV and SMA margins were associated with poorer overall survival. Multiple involved margins impacted negatively on outcome. SMA margin patient outcome with R1 = 1-1.9 mm was similar to R1=>2 mm. CONCLUSION: Using an R1 definition of <1 mm and standardised pathology we demonstrate that R1 rates in PDAC can approach 90%. R1 = 0 mm remained an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Using R1<1 mm we have shown that involvement of medial margins and multiple margins has significant negative impact on overall survival. We conclude that not all margin positivity has the same prognostic significance. Crown
Authors: Emrullah Birgin; Erik Rasbach; Patrick Téoule; Felix Rückert; Christoph Reissfelder; Nuh N Rahbari Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Carl Stephan Leonhardt; Willem Niesen; Eva Kalkum; Rosa Klotz; Thomas Hank; Markus Wolfgang Büchler; Oliver Strobel; Pascal Probst Journal: BJS Open Date: 2022-03-08
Authors: Kofi W Oppong; Manu K Nayar; Noor L H Bekkali; Pardeep Maheshwari; Beate Haugk; Antony Darne; Derek M Manas; Jeremy J French; Steven White; Gourab Sen; Sanjay Pandanaboyana; Richard M Charnley; John S Leeds Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2022-03