Literature DB >> 31996125

How to study runs of homozygosity using PLINK? A guide for analyzing medium density SNP data in livestock and pet species.

R Meyermans1, W Gorssen1, N Buys1, S Janssens2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PLINK is probably the most used program for analyzing SNP genotypes and runs of homozygosity (ROH), both in human and in animal populations. The last decade, ROH analyses have become the state-of-the-art method for inbreeding assessment. In PLINK, the --homozyg function is used to perform ROH analyses and relies on several input settings. These settings can have a large impact on the outcome and default values are not always appropriate for medium density SNP array data. Guidelines for a robust and uniform ROH analysis in PLINK using medium density data are lacking, albeit these guidelines are vital for comparing different ROH studies. In this study, 8 populations of different livestock and pet species are used to demonstrate the importance of PLINK input settings. Moreover, the effects of pruning SNPs for low minor allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium on ROH detection are shown.
RESULTS: We introduce the genome coverage parameter to appropriately estimate FROH and to check the validity of ROH analyses. The effect of pruning for linkage disequilibrium and low minor allele frequencies on ROH analyses is highly population dependent and such pruning may result in missed ROH. PLINK's minimal density requirement is crucial for medium density genotypes and if set too low, genome coverage of the ROH analysis is limited. Finally, we provide recommendations for the maximal gap, scanning window length and threshold settings.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we present guidelines for an adequate and robust ROH analysis in PLINK on medium density SNP data. Furthermore, we advise to report parameter settings in publications, and to validate them prior to analysis. Moreover, we encourage authors to report genome coverage to reflect the ROH analysis' validity. Implementing these guidelines will substantially improve the overall quality and uniformity of ROH analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Linkage disequilibrium; Minor allele frequency; PLINK; Runs of homozygosity; SNP density

Year:  2020        PMID: 31996125     DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6463-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  32 in total

1.  No evidence that long runs of homozygosity tend to harbor risk variants for polygenic obesity in Labrador retriever dogs.

Authors:  Maciej Szydlowski; Michal Antkowiak
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.653

2.  Genomic consequences of a century of inbreeding and isolation in the Danish wild boar population.

Authors:  Beril Yıldız; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Christina Hvilsom; Mirte Bosse
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Dynamics of reduced genetic diversity in increasingly fragmented populations of Florida scrub jays,Aphelocoma coerulescens.

Authors:  Tram N Nguyen; Nancy Chen; Elissa J Cosgrove; Reed Bowman; John W Fitzpatrick; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Estimate of inbreeding depression on growth and reproductive traits in a Large White pig population.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Yue Zhuo; Chao Ning; Lei Zhou; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.542

5.  Analysis of Genetic Diversity in the American Standardbred Horse Utilizing Short Tandem Repeats and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.

Authors:  Elizabeth Esdaile; Felipe Avila; Rebecca R Bellone
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.679

6.  A publicly available repository of ROH islands reveals signatures of selection in different livestock and pet species.

Authors:  Wim Gorssen; Roel Meyermans; Steven Janssens; Nadine Buys
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Characterization of Autozygosity in Pigs in Three-Way Crossbreeding.

Authors:  Audrey Ganteil; Silvia T Rodriguez-Ramilo; Bruno Ligonesche; Catherine Larzul
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Genetic diversity and effective population sizes of thirteen Indian cattle breeds.

Authors:  Eva M Strucken; Netsanet Z Gebrehiwot; Marimuthu Swaminathan; Sachin Joshi; Mohammad Al Kalaldeh; John P Gibson
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Whole genome sequencing reveals high differentiation, low levels of genetic diversity and short runs of homozygosity among Swedish wels catfish.

Authors:  Axel Jensen; Mette Lillie; Kristofer Bergström; Per Larsson; Jacob Höglund
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Signatures of Selection and Genomic Diversity of Muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) from Two Populations in North America.

Authors:  Josue Chinchilla-Vargas; Jonathan R Meerbeek; Max F Rothschild; Francesca Bertolini
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.