Literature DB >> 31996013

Diagnostic Values of Inflammatory and Angiogenic Factors for Acute Joint Bleeding in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A.

Huijuan Xu1, Ren Zhong1, Kai Wang2, Xuerong Li1, Yanxia Zhao1, Jian Jiang1, Shaoyong Si1, Lirong Sun1.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the levels of inflammatory factors and angiogenic factors in patients with severe hemophilia A and evaluate their diagnostic values for acute joint bleeding. This study included a total of 144 patients with severe hemophilia A. Of them, 66 had acute joint bleeding. Ninety healthy volunteers were recruited as control. The levels of leukocytes, monocytes, platelets, hemoglobin, phagocyte migration inhibitory factor (MIF), plasminogen, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, d-dimer, and α2 antifibrinolytic enzyme were measured using hematology analyzer. Thrombomodulin, endostatin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors affecting acute joint bleeding. Compared with healthy volunteers, the levels of leukocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP), MIF, and VEGF were significantly (P < .05) elevated in the patients with severe hemophilia A and were significantly higher in patients with joint bleeding than in patients with nonbleeding (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that CRP and VEGF were independent risk factors for acute joint bleeding (P < .05). The area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of CRP for the diagnosis of acute joint bleeding were 0.829, 88.43%, and 67.87%, respectively, and those of VEGF were 0.758, 82.8%, and 68.3%, respectively. The levels of inflammatory factors and angiogenesis factors are elevated in patients with severe hemophilia A and both CRP and VEGF are closely related to acute joint bleeding and may be used as potential biomarkers for predicting acute joint bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiogenic factors; inflammatory factors; joint bleeding; predictive value; severe hemophilia A

Year:  2020        PMID: 31996013      PMCID: PMC7098200          DOI: 10.1177/1076029619892683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 1076-0296            Impact factor:   2.389


Introduction

Hemophilia A is a common hereditary hematological disease. Patients with hemophilia A have spontaneous and repeated bleeding, especially in the muscles and joints. Severe hemophilia A accounts for 60% of patients with hemophilia and has high frequent and serious joint bleeding[1] and neoangiogenesis contributes to the development of hemophilic synovitis.[2] At present, blood coagulation factors are used to measure and predict the bleeding risk for patients with hemophilia.[3] Also, injections of mesenchymal stem cells appear to be efficacious for decreasing pain in patients with hemophilic arthropathy.[4] However, due to the influence of other factors, the accuracy of prediction is not satisfactory. Although hemophilia is a hereditary disorder, its phenotype is affected by environmental factors. Despite intensive studies on severe hemophilia A, reliable predictor for joint bleeding is still unavailable. Clinical studies have shown that in patients with hemophilia, blood coagulation factors play an important role and their elevation is often associated with disorder of joint function.[5] In addition, some promising cartilage and synovium biomarkers are at various stages of development and awaiting further validation in larger patient populations with osteoarthritis and these markers may be potentially used for the diagnosis and prognosis of hemophilic arthropathy.[6] Furthermore, proangiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), stromal cell-derived factor 1, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 were found to be elevated in proangiogenic macrophage/monocyte cells (VEGF+/CD68+ and VEGFR1+/CD11b+) in the pathogenesis of hemophilic joint disease, suggesting that angiogenesis is involved in the disease.[2] Since it is important to predict joint bleeding for prevention and treatment, we investigated the levels of inflammatory and angiogenic factors in patients with severe hemophilia A to identify possible diagnostic biomarkers. The findings would help better management and treatment of the disease.

Materials and Methods

Patients

A total of 144 patients with severe hemophilia A and 90 healthy volunteers were recruited between October 2015 and August 2018 for this study. Among the patients with hemophilia, 78 were nonbleeding and 66 had acute joint bleeding. All patients were male and aged between 11 and 55 years, with an average age of 21.80 ± 7.73 years. The healthy volunteers were also male and aged 11 to 56 years, with an average age of 22.11 ± 7.93 years. Patients were included if they had baseline factor VIII (FVIII) activity ≤1% and were diagnosed using X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging. They were excluded if they were continuously treated for more than 3 months within 1 year, had chronic joint bleeding or combined bleeding with other organs, recently infused with red blood cells or whole blood, and had hepatitis B virus and HIV infection and severe impairment of liver and kidney function or underlying diseases. Patients with incomplete clinical data were also excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study was approved by the research ethics committee of Qingdao University.

Reagents and Instruments

Hematology analyzer (DxH600) was from Beckman, Brea, California; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate reader was purchased from Thermo Scientific Company, Waltham, Massachusetts; ELISA kits were purchased from Roche, Switzerland; and AU400 automatic biochemical analyzer was a product of Olympus, Japan.

Blood Samples

Peripheral blood samples were collected on an empty stomach in the morning, added immediately with anticoagulant sodium citrate, and mixed by inverting the tube several times. The serum was collected after centrifugation at 3000 g for 20 minutes and stored at −80°C for subsequent use.

Blood Analysis

Blood samples were counted for leukocyte, monocyte, and platelet and analyzed for hemoglobin, macrophage migration inhibitor (MIF), plasminogen (PLG), fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP), d-dimer (D-D), and α2-antiplasmin (α2-AP) using a hematology analyzer. Immunoturbidimetry was used to determine the levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and chemiluminescence was used to measure the levels of ferritin.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Thrombomodulin (TM), endostatin (ES), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were analyzed using ELISA with standards purchased from Roche, Switzerland.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 software. Enumeration data were expressed in percentage and tested using χ2 test; measurement data were expressed as means ± standard deviation. Multiple comparisons were performed using analysis of variance and paired comparisons were performed using q test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors affecting acute joint bleeding. The predictive performance was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC). P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Levels of PLG, FDP, and d-D

The clinical data of participants are given in Table 1. The 3 groups had no difference in averaged age and body mass index. Compared with healthy people, the levels of PLG, FDP, and d-D in the patients with hemophilia were significantly higher (P < .05), and compared with patients with nonjoint bleeding, patients with joint bleeding had higher levels of PLG, FDP, and d-D (P < .05). On the other hand, the levels of α2-AP were similar among the groups (Table 1; P > .05).
Table 1.

Comparison of Clinical Data in Patients With Hemophilia.a

GroupNumber of CaseAverage Age (Years)BMIPLG (%)FDP (μg/mL)D-D (μg/L)α2-AP (%)
Healthy people901616.62 ± 3.1266.28 ± 11.43b 0.48 ± 0.09b 71.33 ± 18.64b 149.43 ± 13.57
Nonbleeding781516.59 ± 2.9386.42 ± 17.26c 0.67 ± 0.12c 91.66 ± 17.43c 152.64 ± 16.69
Bleeding661817.76 ± 4.23103.57 ± 13.29d 0.83 ± 0.19d 112.68 ± 24.19d 152.37 ± 18.24

Abbreviations: α2-AP, α2-antiplasmin; BMI, body mass index; d-D, d-dimer; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products; PLG, plasminogen.

a Figures in the same column labeled with different superscript letters (b to d) are different significantly (P < .05).

Comparison of Clinical Data in Patients With Hemophilia.a Abbreviations: α2-AP, α2-antiplasmin; BMI, body mass index; d-D, d-dimer; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products; PLG, plasminogen. a Figures in the same column labeled with different superscript letters (b to d) are different significantly (P < .05).

Serum Inflammatory Factors

Compared with the control group, patients with severe hemophilia A had significantly higher levels of leukocyte, CRP, ferritin, and MIF (P < .05). Furthermore, these factors were even higher in the bleeding group than in the nonbleeding group (P < .05, Table 2). On the other hand, other indexes such as the levels of monocyte, hemoglobin, platelet, and lactic acid were similar between the groups (Table 2).
Table 2.

Comparison of Serum Inflammatory Factors in Patients With Hemophilia.a

GroupNumber of CaseLeukocyte (109/L)Monocyte (106/L)Hemoglobin (g/dL)Platelet (1011/L)CRP (109/L)Ferritin (mg/dL)Lactic Acid (ng/mL)MIF (mmol/L)
Healthy people906.52 ± 0.86483.18 ± 31.4112.75 ± 2.272.49 ± 0.312.56 ± 0.6731.64 ± 6.871.19 ± 0.230.19 ± 0.03
Nonbleeding787.76 ± 1.05b 491.63 ± 33.7413.18 ± 2.832.56 ± 0.336.79 ± 1.23b 77.68 ± 9.46b 1.2 ± 0.270.51 ± 0.07b
Bleeding668.58 ± 1.33c 503.46 ± 45.1713.54 ± 2.672.62 ± 0.3916.88 ± 3.27c 86.85 ± 11.34c 1.33 ± 0.290.67 ± 0.09c

Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; MIF, migration inhibitory factor.

a Figures in the same column labeled with different superscript letters (b to c) are different significantly (P < .05).

Comparison of Serum Inflammatory Factors in Patients With Hemophilia.a Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; MIF, migration inhibitory factor. a Figures in the same column labeled with different superscript letters (b to c) are different significantly (P < .05).

Serum Angiogenic Factors

Compared with healthy participants, the patients with hemophilia had significantly elevated VEGF levels, which were even higher in the joint bleeding group (P < .05, Table 3). Other angiogenic factors analyzed such as TM, ICAM-1, and ES did not differ between the groups (P > .05, Table 3).
Table 3.

Comparison of Serum Angiogenic Factors in Patients With Hemophilia.a

GroupNumber of CaseVEGF (pg/mL)TM (ng/mL)ICAM-1 (ng/mL)ES (ng/mL)
Healthy people9054.38 ± 9.670.68 ± 0.140.36 ± 0.0660.55 ± 8.11
Nonbleeding7870.63 ± 11.24b 0.72 ± 0.180.35 ± 0.0562.15 ± 7.01
Bleeding66113.26 ± 15.49c 0.73 ± 0.1160.37 ± 0.0661.51 ± 7.41

Abbreviations: ES, endostatin; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; TM, thrombomodulin; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

a Figures in the same column labeled with different superscript letters (b and c) are different significantly (P < .05).

Comparison of Serum Angiogenic Factors in Patients With Hemophilia.a Abbreviations: ES, endostatin; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; TM, thrombomodulin; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. a Figures in the same column labeled with different superscript letters (b and c) are different significantly (P < .05).

Logistic Analysis of Factors Affecting Joint Bleeding

Univariate analysis showed that serum CRP, FDP, VEGF, and ferritin were associated with acute joint bleeding in the patients with hemophilia (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that CRP and VEGF were independent risk factors for the incidence of the joint bleeding (P < .05, Table 4).
Table 4.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Acute Joint Bleeding in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A.

VariableUnivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
OR95% CI P OR95% CI P
CRP6.3633.546-11.418.0212.2341.269-3.933.026
FDP2.3661.556-3.575.0181.0530.948-1.170.516
VEGF4.5152.649-7.695.0012.8262.065-3.867.007
Ferritin3.7682.161-6.570.0062.8360.925-4.938.053
MIF1.8941.507-2.381.1170.7360.677-0.801.663
BMI1.0420.682-1.590.1960.8520.392-1.852.769
d-D2.3110.776-6.882.0711.6220.929-2.832.151
Leukocyte1.5911.456-1.739.0641.7231.319-2.251.106

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; d -D, d-dimer; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products; MIF, migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Acute Joint Bleeding in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; d -D, d-dimer; FDP, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products; MIF, migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Predictive Value of CRP and VEGF for Joint Bleeding

The ROC curve analysis showed that CRP and VEGF had predictive value for joint bleeding in patient with severe hemophilia A (Figure 1). The AUC of CRP in the diagnosis of acute joint bleeding was 0.829 (P < .05), the sensitivity was 88.43%, and the specificity was 67.87% (Figure 1A); and the AUC of VEGF was 0.758 (P < .05), the sensitivity was 82.8%, and the specificity was 68.3% (Figure 1B).
Figure 1.

Receiver operating characteristic curve of CRP (A) and VEGF (B) for predicting acute joint bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia. CRP indicates C-reactive protein; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Receiver operating characteristic curve of CRP (A) and VEGF (B) for predicting acute joint bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia. CRP indicates C-reactive protein; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Discussion

Hemophilia A is a hereditary bleeding disorder caused by the lack of blood clotting factor VIII. The incidence is about 1 in 5000. Although some progresses have been made in the treatment of the disease, arthropathy caused by joint bleeding is still a challenge to prevent and treat, which often results in joint deformity and disability.[7] Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying intra-articular bleeding (hemarthrosis) in patients with hemophilia A is urgently needed to prevent and treat the disease. The severity of hemarthrosis is related to the number of bleeding, but studies also show that inflammatory factors in the joint and angiogenesis factors also play an important role in joint bleeding.[8] Therefore, we set to investigate the relationship between these factors and joint bleeding for the prevention and treatment of joint bleeding. In the animal model of hemophilia arthropathy, it was found that inflammation may last long time after joint bleeding and that leukocyte, interleukin 6, murine double min 2 (mdm2), the p53-binding protein,[21] and CRP play an important role.[9-11] Forsyth et al[12] showed that after bleeding, the bled blood could damage the joint directly and the released inflammatory factors could stimulate the proliferation of macrophage-like synovial cells, causing further damage to the cartilage and synovium and sustained joint damage. Our results showed that CRP, MIF, and leukocyte levels in the patients with joint bleeding are significantly higher than in the patients with nonbleeding, suggesting that the elevation of inflammatory factors is associated with the possibility of joint bleeding. This is consistent with an earlier study, which showed that increased serum CPR level is associated with increased ferritin level and occurrence of arthropathy in patients with hemophilia A.[13] The deposition of ferritin in the synovium may cause inflammation and cartilage damage. Our data show that the level of ferritin in the bleeding group is significantly higher than in nonbleeding group, indicating that high ferritin level is associated with bleeding. The above findings indicate that serum CRP, MIF, ferritin, and leukocyte are related to articular bleeding, suggesting that anti-inflammation therapy may be a direction to treat bleeding in severe hemophilia A. These results are similar to a recent study with relatively small patient cohorts.[14] Our study, on the other hand, was conducted with relatively large sample size and is therefore more statistically accurate. Angiogenesis is an early manifestation of joint lesions, which provides synovial cells with more nutrients and inflammatory factors to infiltrate the synovium. Therefore, it plays important role in the occurrence and development of joint lesions.[12,15] In arthritis, angiogenesis is a complex process and involves many factors such as ICAM-1, ES, VEGF, and protease. Vascular endothelial growth factor is the most studied and its elevation promotes the division and proliferation of vascular endothelial cells and cell migration and plays an important regulatory role in angiogenesis.[16,17] Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 is strongly expressed in proliferated vascular endothelial cells, promoting adhesion between leukocytes and endothelial cells that induces angiogenesis.[18,19] Endostatin is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Once injected into immunodeficient rats, although it inhibits neovascularization and alleviates inflammation, the joint deformity is serious.[20,21] Thrombomodulin is a transmembrane glycoprotein, which mainly exists in vascular endothelial cells. Recently, TM protein fragments have been found to promote angiogenesis and stimulate the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells and formation of blood vessels.[22] However, our study shows that the levels of ICAM-1, ES, and TM are similar between bleeding group and nonbleeding group, but the level of VEGF is significantly higher in the bleeding group than in the nonbleeding group, suggesting that only VEGF is related to joint bleeding and may be an important cause of bleeding. On other hand, ICAM-1, ES, and TM may not be direct risk factors. It was found that serum VEGF alone can induce ovascularization,[23] supporting that there is a correlation between VEGF and joint bleeding. The frequency of joint bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A is high, and only 15% of the patients in Chinese population has mild bleeding.[24] It is important to deliberate the causes of the bleeding for better prognosis of patients. Our logistic regression analysis showed that CRP and VEGF are independent risk factors for acute joint bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A. The ROC analysis showed that the serum levels of CRP and VEGF could be potentially used for predicting the risk of joint bleeding. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of CRP to diagnose joint bleeding are 0.829, 88.43%, and 67.87%, respectively, and those of VEGF were 0.758, 82.8%, and 68.3%, respectively, suggesting that these 2 factors are useful and reliable biomarkers to predict joint bleeding.

Conclusions

Our analysis demonstrates that the levels of inflammatory and angiogenesis factors increase in patients with severe hemophilia A. Both CRP and VEGF levels are associated with joint bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia and may be used as diagnostic markers to predict joint bleeding. However, due to the heredity nature of the disease, the number of patients included in the study is limited and were not followed up for long time. Further studies with long follow-up and large number, particularly with patents before hemarthrosis, are needed to further validate our conclusions.
  21 in total

1.  The investigation of relationship between joint findings and serum angiogenic and inflammatory factor levels in severe hemophilia A patients.

Authors:  Tuba H Karapnar; Nihal Karadaş; Gülcihan Özek; Özlem Tüfekçi; Berna Atabay; Meral Türker; Faize Yüksel; Deniz Y Karapınar; Canan Vergin; Gülersu İrken; Hale Ören
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.276

2.  Prediction of individual factor VIII or IX level for the correction of thrombin generation in haemophilic patients.

Authors:  P Chelle; A Montmartin; M Piot; L Ardillon; B Wibaut; B Frotscher; M Cournil; C Morin; B Tardy-Poncet
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 3.  Targeting VEGF and Its Receptors for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis and Associated Pain.

Authors:  John L Hamilton; Masashi Nagao; Brett R Levine; Di Chen; Bjorn R Olsen; Hee-Jeong Im
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Intra-articular injections of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as a treatment for hemophilic arthropathy.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.929

Review 5.  Blood-induced joint disease: the pathophysiology of hemophilic arthropathy.

Authors:  L A Valentino
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Regulation of endothelial glutathione by ICAM-1 governs VEGF-A-mediated eNOS activity and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Will Langston; John H Chidlow; Blake A Booth; Shayne C Barlow; David J Lefer; Rakesh P Patel; Christopher G Kevil
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 7.376

7.  Pathobiology of hemophilic synovitis I: overexpression of mdm2 oncogene.

Authors:  Narine Hakobyan; Tamara Kazarian; Adnan A Jabbar; Kausar J Jabbar; Leonard A Valentino
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Synovial tissue macrophages and joint erosion in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  G Yanni; A Whelan; C Feighery; B Bresnihan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Aging among persons with hemophilia: contemporary concerns.

Authors:  Dana Angelini; Barbara A Konkle; Suman L Sood
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 10.  Synovium and cartilage biomarkers in hemophilic arthropathy.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.929

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Progression of Hemophilic Arthropathy: The Role of Biomarkers.

Authors:  Gianluigi Pasta; Salvatore Annunziata; Alberto Polizzi; Laura Caliogna; Eugenio Jannelli; Alessandro Minen; Mario Mosconi; Francesco Benazzo; Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Management of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy in persons with haemophilia.

Authors:  Steven W Pipe; Radoslaw Kaczmarek; Alok Srivastava; Glenn F Pierce; Mike Makris; Cedric Hermans
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.263

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.