Literature DB >> 31995473

Real-Time Quality Assessment of Long-Term ECG Signals Recorded by Wearables in Free-Living Conditions.

Lukas Smital, Clifton R Haider, Martin Vitek, Pavel Leinveber, Pavel Jurak, Andrea Nemcova, Radovan Smisek, Lucie Marsanova, Ivo Provaznik, Christopher L Felton, Barry K Gilbert, David R Holmes Iii.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nowadays, methods for ECG quality assessment are mostly designed to binary distinguish between good/bad quality of the whole signal. Such classification is not suitable to long-term data collected by wearable devices. In this paper, a novel approach to estimate long-term ECG signal quality is proposed.
METHODS: The real-time quality estimation is performed in a local time window by calculation of continuous signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) curve. The layout of the data quality segments is determined by analysis of SNR waveform. It is distinguished between three levels of ECG signal quality: signal suitable for full wave ECG analysis, signal suitable only for QRS detection, and signal unsuitable for further processing.
RESULTS: The SNR limits for reliable QRS detection and full ECG waveform analysis are 5 and 18 dB respectively. The method was developed and tested using synthetic data and validated on real data from wearable device.
CONCLUSION: The proposed solution is a robust, accurate and computationally efficient algorithm for annotation of ECG signal quality that will facilitate the subsequent tailored analysis of ECG signals recorded in free-living conditions. SIGNIFICANCE: The field of long-term ECG signals self-monitoring by wearable devices is swiftly developing. The analysis of massive amount of collected data is time consuming. It is advantageous to characterize data quality in advance and thereby limit consequent analysis to useable signals.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31995473     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2969719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  6 in total

1.  Wearable Electrocardiogram Quality Assessment Using Wavelet Scattering and LSTM.

Authors:  Feifei Liu; Shengxiang Xia; Shoushui Wei; Lei Chen; Yonglian Ren; Xiaofei Ren; Zheng Xu; Sen Ai; Chengyu Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  ECGAssess: A Python-Based Toolbox to Assess ECG Lead Signal Quality.

Authors:  Linus Kramer; Carlo Menon; Mohamed Elgendi
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 3.  Golden Standard or Obsolete Method? Review of ECG Applications in Clinical and Experimental Context.

Authors:  Tibor Stracina; Marina Ronzhina; Richard Redina; Marie Novakova
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Robustness of electrocardiogram signal quality indices.

Authors:  Saifur Rahman; Chandan Karmakar; Iynkaran Natgunanathan; John Yearwood; Marimuthu Palaniswami
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  ECG performance in simultaneous recordings of five wearable devices using a new morphological noise-to-signal index and Smith-Waterman-based RR interval comparisons.

Authors:  Dominic Bläsing; Anja Buder; Julian Elias Reiser; Maria Nisser; Steffen Derlien; Marcus Vollmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Identification of Transient Noise to Reduce False Detections in Screening for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hesam Halvaei; Emma Svennberg; Leif Sörnmo; Martin Stridh
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.