Conor H O'Neill1, Jaclyn Moore1, Prejesh Philips1, Robert C G Martin2. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. Robert.martin@louisville.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Adequate perioperative nutrition is critical for the success of surgical outcomes. Jejunostomy feeding tube placement may ensure enteral feeding access; however, these types of tubes have had variable reported rates of dysfunction/morbidity. The aim of our study was to report our experience with jejunostomy feeding tube placement and the long-term outcomes following complex foregut surgery. METHODS: We performed a review of all of our jejunostomy feeding tube placement patients from 1/1/2010 until 7/1/2018. The indication for surgery and primary operation were recorded. All adverse events related to the jejunostomy were recorded during the entire duration of tube access. Social "hassle-factor" issues were also reported, including the number of "jejunostomy-related" phone calls, reinsertion and related placement studies, and readmissions pertaining to jejunostomy-associated complications. RESULTS: During the study period, 542 primary procedures were performed with secondary jejunostomy placement. Jejunostomy-related adverse events occurred in 22.0% of patients (n = 119/542); 12.0% (n = 65/542) were dislodged tubes, 6.0% (n = 30/542) clogged tubes; 5% (n = 25/542) leaking tubes, and 2.8% (n = 15/542) site infections. Tube dysfunctions initiated 244 reinsertion/placement studies in 107 patients, 20 jejunostomy tube-related readmissions, and 78 phone calls to providers for tube dysfunction. Adverse event rates differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001), with esophagogastric resection adverse event rates of 42.3% versus 19.2% for pancreatic ablations. DISCUSSION: Jejunostomy feeding tubes resulted in adverse events in less than a third of patients. Patient-related hassle must be communicated preoperatively in order to prevent jejunostomy tube-related morbidity. Optimal early and late jejunostomy feeding optimization varies based on preoperative patient comorbidities, type of operation, and the need for adjuvant oncology therapy.
INTRODUCTION: Adequate perioperative nutrition is critical for the success of surgical outcomes. Jejunostomy feeding tube placement may ensure enteral feeding access; however, these types of tubes have had variable reported rates of dysfunction/morbidity. The aim of our study was to report our experience with jejunostomy feeding tube placement and the long-term outcomes following complex foregut surgery. METHODS: We performed a review of all of our jejunostomy feeding tube placement patients from 1/1/2010 until 7/1/2018. The indication for surgery and primary operation were recorded. All adverse events related to the jejunostomy were recorded during the entire duration of tube access. Social "hassle-factor" issues were also reported, including the number of "jejunostomy-related" phone calls, reinsertion and related placement studies, and readmissions pertaining to jejunostomy-associated complications. RESULTS: During the study period, 542 primary procedures were performed with secondary jejunostomy placement. Jejunostomy-related adverse events occurred in 22.0% of patients (n = 119/542); 12.0% (n = 65/542) were dislodged tubes, 6.0% (n = 30/542) clogged tubes; 5% (n = 25/542) leaking tubes, and 2.8% (n = 15/542) site infections. Tube dysfunctions initiated 244 reinsertion/placement studies in 107 patients, 20 jejunostomy tube-related readmissions, and 78 phone calls to providers for tube dysfunction. Adverse event rates differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001), with esophagogastric resection adverse event rates of 42.3% versus 19.2% for pancreatic ablations. DISCUSSION: Jejunostomy feeding tubes resulted in adverse events in less than a third of patients. Patient-related hassle must be communicated preoperatively in order to prevent jejunostomy tube-related morbidity. Optimal early and late jejunostomy feeding optimization varies based on preoperative patient comorbidities, type of operation, and the need for adjuvant oncology therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Enteral nutrition; Jejunostomy; Malnutrition; Postoperative care
Authors: Jann Arends; Patrick Bachmann; Vickie Baracos; Nicole Barthelemy; Hartmut Bertz; Federico Bozzetti; Ken Fearon; Elisabeth Hütterer; Elizabeth Isenring; Stein Kaasa; Zeljko Krznaric; Barry Laird; Maria Larsson; Alessandro Laviano; Stefan Mühlebach; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Line Oldervoll; Paula Ravasco; Tora Solheim; Florian Strasser; Marian de van der Schueren; Jean-Charles Preiser Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2016-08-06 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Meredith C Mason; Jose M Garcia; Shubhada Sansgiry; Annette Walder; David H Berger; Daniel A Anaya Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Gregory C Dann; Malcolm H Squires; Lauren M Postlewait; David A Kooby; George A Poultsides; Sharon M Weber; Mark Bloomston; Ryan C Fields; Timothy M Pawlik; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Carl R Schmidt; Aslam Ejaz; Alexandra W Acher; David J Worhunsky; Neil Saunders; Edward A Levine; Linda X Jin; Clifford S Cho; Emily R Winslow; Maria C Russell; Kenneth Cardona; Charles A Staley; Shishir K Maithel Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 3.454