Literature DB >> 31993255

Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida).

Himanshu Sharma1,2, Jaakko Hyvönen2,3, Péter Poczai2.   

Abstract

PREMISE: Plant invasions are increasing globally, and extensive study of the genetic background of the source and invading populations is needed to understand such biological processes. For this reason, chloroplast microsatellite markers were identified to explore the genetic diversity of the noxious weed Ambrosia trifida (Asteraceae). METHODS AND
RESULTS: The complete chloroplast genome of A. trifida was mined for microsatellite loci, and 15 novel chloroplast primers were identified to assess the genetic diversity of 49 Ambrosia samples. The number of alleles amplified ranged from two to six, with an average of 3.2 alleles per locus. Shannon's information index varied from 0.305 and 1.467, expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.178 to 0.645, and the polymorphism information content value ranged from 0.211 to 0.675 (average 0.428). The cross-species transferability of the 15 microsatellite loci was also evaluated in four related Ambrosia species (A. artemisiifolia, A. maritima, A. psilostachya, and A. tenuifolia).
CONCLUSIONS: The novel chloroplast microsatellite markers developed in the current study demonstrate substantial cross-species transferability and will be helpful in future genetic diversity studies of A. trifida and related species.
© 2020 Sharma et al. Applications in Plant Sciences is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Botanical Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambrosia trifida; Asteraceae; microsatellites; molecular markers; noxious weeds; plant invasions; plastid; polymorphism

Year:  2020        PMID: 31993255      PMCID: PMC6976888          DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) belongs to the Asteraceae family (tribe Heliantheae, subtribe Ambrosiinae) together with 40–50 other ragweed (Ambrosia L.) species (Payne, 1964). The genus Ambrosia is native to North America with a center of diversity located in the Sonoran Desert (Martin et al., 2018). Giant ragweed is known as an invasive plant on the European continent together with common ragweed (A. artemisiifolia L.). Both species are noxious weeds and interfere with the growth development and establishment of various crops (Kong et al., 2007). The primary habitat of A. trifida is flood plains and ditch banks, but in the recent past it has spread to the Corn Belt in the United States, causing great economic losses. In addition to its competition with crops, Ambrosia pollen is responsible for allergic reactions in late summer and autumn (Ghosh et al., 1991) and constitutes a major health problem in North America and several countries in Europe. Urbanization and long‐distance transport capacity have enhanced the spread of ragweed species (Montagnani et al., 2017), while global heating and rising CO2 emissions are increasing the amount of Ambrosia pollen in the air (Wayne et al., 2002). Ambrosia research is mostly concentrated on common ragweed, and therefore the population structure of other ragweed species is mostly unknown. For A. artemisiifolia, microsatellite markers were developed to determine the origins of invading populations in Europe (Gaudeul et al., 2011), and the history of the invasion was also investigated using herbarium specimens (Martin et al., 2014). Genomic resources are also under development to facilitate further research in ragweed genetics, e.g., the plastid genome of A. trifida (Sablok et al., 2019) and A. artemisiifolia (Amiryousefi et al., 2017; Nagy et al., 2017) have been sequenced. To the best of our knowledge, no reports have been published on chloroplast microsatellite markers for A. trifida, and the cross‐species transferability of microsatellite markers has not been investigated. In the current study, we identified 15 novel chloroplast microsatellite markers, which will enrich the existing genomic resources for ragweeds, and we have successfully validated these markers in relevant giant ragweed populations and related species of Ambrosia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched the complete chloroplast genome of A. trifida (Sablok et al., 2019; GenBank accession number NC036810) for microsatellite loci. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were identified using MISA software (Thiel et al., 2003). Mononucleotide repeats were excluded from our search, and we applied a threshold based on minimum length criteria (unit size/minimum repeat time): six for di‐, four for tri‐, and three for tetra‐, penta‐, and hexanucleotide repeats, respectively. MISA allowed the identification and localization of perfect as well as compound microsatellites. Compound SSRs were considered repeats disrupted by a non‐repetitive length of 100‐bp sequence. Based on the flanking regions of the repeat regions, we designed primers for 15 cpSSR loci using the BatchPrimer3 version 1.0 web program (You et al., 2008). The parameters for designing PCR primers were as follows: (1) primer length ranging from 18 to 23 bp; (2) PCR product size range of 100–300 bp; (3) melting temperature between 50°C and 70°C, with 55°C as the optimum annealing temperature; and (4) a GC content of 40–70%, with an optimum of 50% (Table 1).
Table 1

The characteristics of 10 polymorphic and five monomorphic chloroplast microsatellite loci developed for Ambrosia trifida.

Locusa Primer sequences (5′–3′)PositionRepeat motifAllele size range (bp)Fluorescent labelGenBank accession no.
AART_MS2 F: GCAGTCAATTATGTGTCTCCT psbC gene(TTC)3 142–148HEX MN385584
  R: GTTCAAAATCACGATCAATTC      
AART_MS3 F: TGAAGTATGGAAGGAGATCAA rbcL gene(GGATAA)3 136–1486‐FAM MN385586
  R: TCGGCTCAATCCTTTTAGTA      
ATRI_MS9 F: GGAGTTCTTTCGTCTCAAAAT ycf4‐cemA IGS(ATT)3 138–144TAMRA MN385585
  R: TCCCTAATAGTCAAAAGCACA      
AART_MS5 F: CCTTGTACCATATTCCTAGCC petA‐psbJ IGS(TTCT)4 146–154HEX MN385587
  R: ACATTTCAATCTCACAATAGCA     
AART_MS9 F: CAGAATTCCAGTGTCTAATGG ndhA intron(TATC)4 140–1606‐FAM MN385588
  R: TGAGATTTTCATCTCATACGG      
ATRI_MS6 F: TACTGTTTAGGCAGAATACCG ycf1 gene(AGA)3 156–162TAMRA MN385593
  R: CCCATACATATAATCAACCGTA     
ATRI_MS8 F: GTAATGGCAATTGGAATGATA ndhD gene(TATT)3 145–161HEX MN385592
  R: AGGTAGAAAAATGGAGATGGA     
AART_MS11 F: CCAAAATTTGAGCGAAAATAG trnL‐rpl32 IGS(TTTA)3 159–1676‐FAM MN385591
  R: TTGGCAGTCCCTATTCTAATC      
AART_MP6 F: TCTTACAAGGAAAGGGAAA rpl33‐rps18 IGS(TATT)4 137–153TAMRA MN385589
  R: TAGTTTATTTCTTATCCCT      
AART_MP1 F: GCAGGTTAGATTCAAGCACTA trnK‐rps16 IGS(AATT)3 157–163HEX MN385590
  R: ATGCAGTGCCRATSYAACACA      
ATRI_MZ1 F: GGTAATCATTCAAATTAAGAACGGAAG trnK intron(AATG)3 200
  R: TTCTGAGAATATTTTATTCTTTCCGGC      
ATRI_MZ2 F: AGTGGACCTGACCCATTGAA trnT‐psbD IGS(TTTA)3 130
  R: CGACAAATTCTTGCGGAGTCC      
ATRI_MZ3 F: GATCTCGGGTGTGATGGTCA trnS‐psbZ IGS(ATCT)3 103
  R: CGGGGGAGAATGGAATTGGG      
ATRI_MZ4 F: TCGCTAATTGATCTTTACGGTGC ycf3 intron II(TTTC)3 163
  R: AGGGCTTTCTACATATGCATCGT      
ATRI_MZ5 F: TGGCGAAATTGGTAGACGCT trnL intron(AAAC)3 198
  R: GCTTCCATCGAGTCTCTGCA      

IGS = intergenic spacer.

The annealing temperature for all primers is 55°C except for AART_MP6 for which it is 52°C.

The characteristics of 10 polymorphic and five monomorphic chloroplast microsatellite loci developed for Ambrosia trifida. IGS = intergenic spacer. The annealing temperature for all primers is 55°C except for AART_MP6 for which it is 52°C. After primer design, amplification efficiency and polymorphism were evaluated using 29 A. trifida DNA samples from two different historical populations collected in Europe and North America. Cross‐amplification in the genus Ambrosia was assessed in five individuals each of A. artemisiifolia, A. maritima L., A. psilostachya DC., and A. tenuifolia Spreng. DNA samples were taken from the herbarium collection of the Finnish Museum of Natural History (Appendix 1). Leaf samples were rinsed with deionized water and 70% ethanol, and total genomic DNA was isolated using the E.Z.N.A. Plant Kit (Omega Bio‐tek, Norcross, Georgia, USA). Laboratory work was carried out in a separate DNA laboratory at the University of Helsinki. Blank samples were processed together with herbarium material during DNA extractions. Final concentrations were measured with a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). PCR amplification was carried out in a 20‐μL volume containing 20 ng of genomic DNA, 0.2 mM of dNTPs (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 2 μL 1× PCR buffer, 20 pM of each primer, and 0.25 units DyNAzyme DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All reactions were performed in a MasterCycler ep96 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) with the following settings: 2 min of initial denaturation at 94°C; 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 1 min at 55°C, and extension for 2 min at 72°C; followed by a final extension for 5 min at 72°C. Amplification products were separated on 1.5% agarose gels (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, USA) using a 0.5× TBE buffer (220 V, 0.5 h) and stained with SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to validate successful amplifications. After initial testing with three A. trifida and four Ambrosia species samples (A. artemisiifolia, A. maritima, A. psilostachya, and A. tenuifolia), the amplifications were repeated using fluorescently labeled primers applying the PCR protocol described above using all 49 Ambrosia samples. PCR products were analyzed on an ABI 3730XL DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) using a GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems). The scoring of electropherograms was carried out with Geneious Prime (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). All primers amplified successfully across the test individuals and 10 proved to be polymorphic, whereas five gave monomorphic patterns (Table 1). The polymorphic markers were used to evaluate the genetic diversity of 49 Ambrosia samples. The number of alleles, effective number of alleles, and Shannon's information index were calculated with GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012), while expected heterozygosity and the polymorphism information content were calculated using iMEC (Amiryousefi et al., 2018). The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to six, the effective number of alleles ranged from 1.198 to 2.324, Shannon's information index ranged from 0.305 and 1.467, and the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.178 to 0.645, while the polymorphism information content ranged from 0.211 to 0.675 (Table 2). The 10 polymorphic loci were also successfully amplified in 20 individuals (five individuals each) in the following four related species: A. artemisiifolia, A. maritima, A. psilostachya, and A. tenuifolia (Table 3, Appendix 1).
Table 2

Characteristics of 10 polymorphic chloroplast microsatellite markers in 29 individuals of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida).a

Locus Ambrosia trifida (N = 29)
A A e I H e PIC
AART_MS231.6240.6750.4130.478
AART_MS332.3241.4670.6450.675
ATRI_MS932.1120.8080.5730.597
AART_MS521.2710.3690.2030.267
AART_MS961.6540.9110.4260.501
ATRI_MS631.2330.3340.1780.211
ATRI_MS841.1980.3050.4460.523
AART_MS1121.4240.4140.2880.312
AART_MP641.8060.8970.4460.489
AART_MP121.2510.3290.2180.225
Mean3.2001.4240.6510.3840.428

A = number of alleles; A e = effective number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; I = Shannon's information index; N = number of individuals sampled; PIC = polymorphism information content.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Table 3

Results of cross‐amplification of 10 polymorphic chloroplast microsatellite markers developed for Ambrosia trifida in four related ragweed species. ,

Locus A. artemisiifolia (N = 5) A. psilostachya (N = 5) A. tenuifolia (N = 5) A. maritima (N = 5)
AART_MS2142–148145–148148–154142–148
AART_MS3142–148148–154142–154142–148
ATRI_MS9141–144144–147147–153141–144
AART_MS5146–154150–158154–162150–154
AART_MS9144–160152–160156–164148–160
ATRI_MS6159–162156–162159–168159–162
ATRI_MS8153–165153–157153–161149–161
AART_MS11159–171163–175163–175159–171
AART_MP6141–149153–157149–157141–153
AART_MP1161–163163–171159–167157–163

N = number of individuals sampled.

Numbers shown represent the size in base pairs (bp) of the amplified fragments.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Characteristics of 10 polymorphic chloroplast microsatellite markers in 29 individuals of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida).a A = number of alleles; A e = effective number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; I = Shannon's information index; N = number of individuals sampled; PIC = polymorphism information content. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Results of cross‐amplification of 10 polymorphic chloroplast microsatellite markers developed for Ambrosia trifida in four related ragweed species. , N = number of individuals sampled. Numbers shown represent the size in base pairs (bp) of the amplified fragments. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

CONCLUSIONS

We used the recently sequenced plastid genome of A. trifida (Sablok et al., 2019) to develop and characterize 15 chloroplast microsatellite markers; these were then used to identify high genetic diversity among the analyzed giant ragweed samples. Overall population genetic variation was similar to that detected in common ragweed (A. artemisiifolia) in North America and in the Rhône‐Alpes region (Genton et al., 2005). Given the high level of polymorphism detected with the developed cpSSR primer set in the A. trifida population, the markers developed here should be suitable for further studies investigating the origin of invasive populations in Europe and studying the dynamics of invasion and modes of dispersal. Due to the high rate of cross‐amplification, the developed polymorphic cpSSR primers will likely be useful in intra‐ or interspecific genetic studies of the genus Ambrosia.
SpeciesVoucher no.Collection yearCollection locality
Ambrosia trifida L.H16511881936Viipuri, Maaskola
 H16511891936Viipuri, Maaskola
 H16455521938Helsinki, botanical garden
 H1645551ca. 1930–1935Helsinki, botanical garden
 H12738911977Helsinki, botanical garden
 H17257612001Missouri, Washington State Park
 H15915441957Arlington, Virginia, Anderson Hospital
 H15661121984Cameron, Louisiana
 H10764061966Middleton, Dane County, Wisconsin
 H10764071966Middleton, Dane County, Wisconsin
 H10189481970Towson, Baltimore County, Maryland
 H11393391975Florence, Hampshire County, Massachusetts
 H11376521959The Pas, Manitoba, Canada
 H11413471972Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina
 H11509751976Saint‐Fulgence, Québec
 H12080631976Saint‐Fulgence, Québec
 H15557991980Saint Albans, Franklin County, Vermont
 H16455431939Arnaud, Manitoba
 H16455441968Saint‐Gédéon, Québec
 H16455481935Rigaud, Québec
 H16455461961Sioux Lookout, Ontario
 H16455451867Middleton, Dane County, Wisconsin
 H16455471958Saint‐Fulgence, Québec
 H16455501892Wisconsin
 H12821911979City of Thunder Bay, Ontario
 H10171271967Mount Horeb, Dane County, Wisconsin
 H15898551988Luhansk (then Voroshilovgrad), Ukraine
 H15814401972Litomerice, Czech Republic
 H16455401902Schleswig‐Holstein, Germany
Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.H10709001968Győr, Hungary
 H12165211976Graz, Austria
 H12244071974Solosnica, Slovakia
 H16796321992Torino, Piemonte, Italy
 H16730361990Anvers (Antwerp), Belgium
Ambrosia maritima L. H16455211964Massa, Tuscany, Italy
 H16455221964Massa, Tuscany, Italy
 H10924721973Berre‐l’Étang, France
 H14776431958Punta Sabbioni, Venice, Italy
 H14751971981Sanlúcar de Barrameda, Cadiz, Spain
Ambrosia psilostachya DC.H11552991947Noordwijk, the Netherlands
 H12476941979Berlin, (West) Germany
 H11163441975Anvers (Antwerp), Belgium
 H1594014NANA
 H1467250NANA
Ambrosia tenuifolia Spreng. H16455341908Chapelle St. Laurent Beaucaire, France
 H14879271967Buenos Aires, Rio de Plata
 H14910531974Buenos Aires, Florida, Calle General Roca
 H14869331967Buenos Aires, Magdalena, Arroyo Juan Blanco
 H14869341967Buenos Aires, Magdalena, Arroyo Juan Blanco

NA = not available.

All vouchered specimens are deposited at the herbarium of the Finnish Museum of Natural History (H), University of Helsinki, Finland.

  12 in total

1.  Herbarium specimens reveal a historical shift in phylogeographic structure of common ragweed during native range disturbance.

Authors:  Michael D Martin; Elizabeth A Zimmer; Morten T Olsen; Andrew D Foote; M Thomas P Gilbert; Grace S Brush
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Herbarium collection-based phylogenetics of the ragweeds (Ambrosia, Asteraceae).

Authors:  Michael D Martin; Elva Quiroz-Claros; Grace S Brush; Elizabeth A Zimmer
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Cloning the cDNA encoding the AmbtV allergen from giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) pollen.

Authors:  B Ghosh; M P Perry; D G Marsh
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1991-05-30       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Production of allergenic pollen by ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) is increased in CO2-enriched atmospheres.

Authors:  Peter Wayne; Susannah Foster; John Connolly; Fakhri Bazzaz; Paul Epstein
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.347

5.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites show multiple introductions in the worldwide invasion history of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia.

Authors:  Myriam Gaudeul; Tatiana Giraud; Levente Kiss; Jacqui A Shykoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Illumina sequencing of the chloroplast genome of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.).

Authors:  Erzsébet Nagy; Géza Hegedűs; János Taller; Barbara Kutasy; Eszter Virág
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-10-07

8.  Sequencing the Plastid Genome of Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida, Asteraceae) From a Herbarium Specimen.

Authors:  Gaurav Sablok; Ali Amiryousefi; Xiaolan He; Jaakko Hyvönen; Péter Poczai
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  BatchPrimer3: a high throughput web application for PCR and sequencing primer design.

Authors:  Frank M You; Naxin Huo; Yong Qiang Gu; Ming-Cheng Luo; Yaqin Ma; Dave Hane; Gerard R Lazo; Jan Dvorak; Olin D Anderson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  iMEC: Online Marker Efficiency Calculator.

Authors:  Ali Amiryousefi; Jaakko Hyvönen; Péter Poczai
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 1.936

View more
  1 in total

1.  Chloroplast and Nuclear Genetic Diversity Explain the Limited Distribution of Endangered and Endemic Thuja sutchuenensis in China.

Authors:  Zhi Yao; Xinyu Wang; Kailai Wang; Wenhao Yu; Purong Deng; Jinyi Dong; Yonghua Li; Kaifeng Cui; Yongbo Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.599

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.