| Literature DB >> 31993040 |
Meihua Xie1,2,3,4, Na Bai1,2,3, Jiangliu Yang1,2,3, Kexin Jiang1,2,3, Duanxu Zhou1,2,3, Yining Zhao1,2,3, Dongni Li1,2,3, Xuemei Niu1,2,3, Ke-Qin Zhang1,2,3, Jinkui Yang1,2,3.
Abstract
Inducer of meiosis 2 (Ime2), a protein kinase that has been identified in diverse fungal species, functions in the regulation of various cellular processes, such as ascospore formation, pseudohyphal growth, and sexual reproduction. In this study, AoIme2, an ortholog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ime2, was characterized in the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora. Disruption of the gene Aoime2 caused defective growth, with slower mycelial growth in ΔAoime2 mutants than the wild type (WT) strain, and in the mutants, the number of hyphal septa in mycelia was higher and the number of cell nuclei in mycelia and conidia was considerably lower than in the WT strain. The conidial yields of the ΔAoime2 mutants were decreased by ∼33% relative to the WT strain, and the transcription of several sporulation-related genes, including abaA, fluG, rodA, aspB, velB, and vosA, was markedly downregulated during the conidiation stage. The ΔAoime2 mutants were highly sensitive to the osmotic stressors NaCl and sorbitol, and the cell wall of partial hyphae in the mutants was deformed. Further examination revealed that the cell wall of the traps produced by ΔAoime2 mutants became loose, and that the electron-dense bodies in trap cells were also few than in the WT strain. Moreover, Aoime2 disruption caused a reduction in trap formation and serine-protease production, and most hyphal traps produced by ΔAoime2 mutants did not form an intact hyphal loop; consequently, substantially fewer nematodes were captured by the mutants than by the WT strain. In summary, an Ime2-MAPK is identified here for the first time from a nematode-trapping fungus, and the kinase is shown to be involved in the regulation of mycelial growth and development, conidiation, osmolarity, and pathogenicity in A. oligospora.Entities:
Keywords: Arthrobotrys oligospora; conidiation; inducer of meiosis 2; mycelial development; osmolarity; pathogenicity
Year: 2020 PMID: 31993040 PMCID: PMC6971104 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Comparison of mycelial growth, morphology, and septum formation between wild type (WT) and ΔAoime2 mutants. (A) Colony morphology (upper panel) and hyphae (lower panel) of WT and ΔAoime2 mutant strains incubated on TYGA medium for 5 days at 28°C. (B) Colony diameters of WT and ΔAoime2 mutants incubated on PDA, TYGA, and TG media for 7 days. (C) Hyphal septa of WT and mutants were stained with 20 μg/mL calcofluor white (CFW) after the fungal strains were incubated on CMY medium for 7 days. Arrows: hyphal septa. Bar = 10 μm. (D) Comparison of mycelial cell size of WT and mutants; 60 mycelial cells were randomly selected, and the distance between two hyphal septa was measured using ImageJ software. Error bars: SD from 60 replicates; asterisk: significant difference between mutant and WT (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
FIGURE 2Mycelial and conidial cell nuclei in WT versus ΔAoime2 mutant strains. (A) Hyphae of WT and ΔAoime2 mutant strains were stained with CFW and DAPI after the fungal strains were grown for 7 days on CMY medium; samples were examined using an inverted fluorescence microscope. White arrows: septa; pink arrows: cell nuclei, the strong stained and bright points are identified as nuclei. Bar = 20 μm. (B) Comparison of mycelial cell nuclei between WT and mutant strains; 30 mycelial cells were randomly selected and the nucleus in each cell was counted separately. (C) Conidia of WT and ΔAoime2 mutant strains were stained with CFW and DAPI. Bar = 10 μm. (D) Comparison of conidial cell nuclei between WT and mutant strains; 30 conidia were randomly selected for counting cell nuclei. Error bars: SD from 30 replicates; asterisk: significant difference between mutant and WT (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Comparison of conidial yields, morphology, and transcriptional levels (RTLs) of sporulation-related genes between WT and mutant strains. (A) Comparison of conidial yields between WT and ΔAoime2 mutants. Conidial yields were determined after incubation on CMY medium for 15 days. (B) Conidia were stained with CFW and examined under a microscope. Bar = 10 μm. P%: the percentage of each abnormal spore in the ΔAoime2 mutant. (C) Comparison of RTLs of sporulation-related genes between WT and ΔAoime2 mutants at different time points. CK, featuring an RTL of 1, was used as the standard for statistical analysis of the RTL of each gene in the deletion mutants to that in the WT strain under a given condition. Error bars: SD from three replicates, asterisk: significant difference between mutant and WT (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Tolerance to hyperosmotic stress and mycelial morphology: WT versus ΔAoime2 mutants. (A) Comparison of colonial morphology under high-osmolarity stress between WT and ΔAoime2 mutants. (B) RGI values of WT and ΔAoime2 mutants grown on TG plates supplemented with 0.2 M NaCl or 0.5 M sorbitol. Error bars: SD from three replicates, asterisk: significant difference between mutant and WT strain (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). (C) Mycelia of WT and ΔAoime2 mutant strains were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Pink arrows: deformed mycelia in ΔAoime2 mutants. Bar = 10 μm. (D) Traps produced by WT and ΔAoime2 mutant strains were examined using transmission electron microscopy. Pink arrows: ED bodies in trap cells of WT and ΔAoime2 mutant strains; blue arrows: separation of cell wall and plasma membrane in ΔAoime2 mutants.
FIGURE 5Trap formation, trap morphology, and nematicidal activity of WT and ΔAoime2 mutants. (A) Trap formation and morphology (upper images: light microscopy; lower images: SEM) of WT and mutants after 48-h induction of traps by nematodes. Red boxes: traps produced by WT and ΔAoime2 mutants; arrows: hyphal loops in traps. (B) Comparison of traps produced by WT and mutants at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. (C) Percentages of nematodes captured by WT and mutant strains at different time points. Bar = 10 μm. Error bars: SD from three replicates, asterisk: significant difference between mutant and WT (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).
FIGURE 6Comparison of extracellular proteolytic activity and transcriptional levels (RTLs) of serine-protease genes between WT and mutant strains. (A) Comparison of extracellular proteolytic activity of WT and ΔAoime2 mutants on casein plates. (B) Hyphal biomass of WT and ΔAoime2 mutants cultured in PL-4 medium for 7 days. (C) Proteolytic activity of WT and ΔAoime2 mutants quantified from 7-day-old PL-4 cultures. PMSF: serine-protease inhibitor, used at 5 mM. (D) RTLs of protease-encoding genes between WT and ΔAoime2 mutants at different time points. CK (RTL = 1) was used as the standard for statistical analysis of the RTL of each gene in the deletion mutants to that in the WT strain under a given condition. Error bars: SD from three replicates, asterisk: significant difference between mutant and WT (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05).