Literature DB >> 31992059

Acute Coronary Syndrome Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Laurent Faroux1, Erika Munoz-Garcia2, Vicenç Serra3, Alberto Alperi4, Luis Nombela-Franco5, Quentin Fischer6, Gabriela Veiga7, Pierre Donaint8, Lluis Asmarats9, Victoria Vilalta10, Chekrallah Chamandi11, Ander Regueiro12, Enrique Gutiérrez13, Antonio Munoz-Garcia2, Bruno Garcia Del Blanco3, Montserrat Bach-Oller3, Cesar Moris4, German Armijo5, Marina Urena6, Victor Fradejas-Sastre7, Damien Metz8, Pablo Castillo9, Eduard Fernandez-Nofrerias10, Manel Sabaté12, Maria Tamargo13, David Del Val1, Thomas Couture1, Josep Rodes-Cabau1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scarce data exist on coronary events following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and no study has determined the factors associated with poorer outcomes in this setting. This study sought to determine the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events following TAVR.
METHODS: Multicenter cohort study including a total of 270 patients presenting an ACS after a median time of 12 (interquartile range, 5-17) months post-TAVR. Post-ACS death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and overall major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were recorded.
RESULTS: The ACS clinical presentation consisted of non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) type 2 (31.9%), non-STEMI type 1 (31.5%), unstable angina (28.5%), and STEMI (8.1%). An invasive strategy was used in 163 patients (60.4%), and a percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 97 patients (35.9%). Coronary access issues were observed in 2.5% and 2.1% of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 10.0%, and at a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range, 5-32) months, the rates of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were 43.0%, 4.1%, 15.2%, and 52.6%, respectively. By multivariable analysis, revascularization at ACS time was associated with a reduction of the risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36-0.81] P=0.003), whereas STEMI increased the risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.05-4.03] P=0.036) and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.08-3.57] P=0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: ACS events in TAVR recipients exhibited specific characteristics (ACS presentation, low use of invasive procedures, coronary access issues) and were associated with a poor prognosis, with a very high in-hospital and late death rate. STEMI and the lack of coronary revascularization determined an increased risk. These results should inform future studies to improve both the prevention and management of ACS post-TAVR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; coronary artery disease; mortality; percutaneous coronary intervention; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 31992059     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  2 in total

1.  Commentary: Coronary revascularization following aortic valve replacement: More than just a trivial event?

Authors:  Laurent Faroux; Dimitri Kalavrouziotis; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Siamak Mohammadi
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-05-28

2.  New adverse coronary events in valve-in-valve TAVR and native TAVR-A 2-year matched cohort.

Authors:  Ofir Koren; Vivek Patel; Robert Naami; Edmund Naami; Takashi Nagasaka; Alon Shechter; Sharon Shalom Natanzon; Siamak Kohan; Zev Allison; Addee Lerner; Daniel Eugene Cheng; Tarun Chakravarty; Mamoo Nakamura; Wen Cheng; Hasan Jilaihawi; Raj R Makkar
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.