| Literature DB >> 31990699 |
Randie H Kim1, Nooshin K Brinster2.
Abstract
Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) remains a valuable tool that may be underused because of perceived challenges in the interpretation, limitations, and processing of DIF specimens. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for appropriately incorporating DIF in a variety of clinical diseases, such as autoimmune blistering disorders. In vasculitis, the role of DIF continues to evolve, particularly in the setting of IgA vasculitis. Although typically not indicated for the workup of connective tissue disease, DIF may be helpful in cases with negative serologies, nondiagnostic histologic findings, or scarring alopecia. Practical pearls for biopsy technique, specimen handling, and storage are also discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31990699 DOI: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Dermatopathol ISSN: 0193-1091 Impact factor: 1.533