Literature DB >> 31990563

Specific Disruption of Established Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms Using Polymer-Attacking Enzymes.

Kristin N Kovach1, Derek Fleming2, Marilyn J Wells1, Kendra P Rumbaugh2, Vernita Diane Gordon1,3.   

Abstract

Biofilms are communities of bacteria embedded in a polymeric matrix which are found in infections and in environments outside the body. Breaking down the matrix renders biofilms more susceptible to physical disruption and to treatments such as antibiotics. Different species of bacteria, and different strains within the same species, produce different types of matrix polymers. This suggests that targeting specific polymers for disruption may be more effective than nonspecific approaches to disrupting biofilm matrixes. In this study, we treated Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms with enzymes that are specific to different matrix polymers. We measured the resulting alteration in biofilm mechanics using bulk rheology and changes in structure using electron microscopy. We find that, for biofilms grown in vitro, the effect of enzymatic treatment is greatest when the enzyme is specific to a dominant matrix polymer. Specifically matched enzymatic treatment tends to reduce yield strain and yield stress and increase the rate of biofilm drying, due to increased diffusivity as a result of network compromise. Electron micrographs qualitatively suggest that well-matched enzymatic treatments reduce long-range structure and shorten connecting network fibers. Previous work has shown that generic glycoside hydrolases can cause dispersal of bacteria from in vivo and ex vivo biofilms into a free-swimming state, and thereby make antibiotic treatment more effective. For biofilms grown in wounded mice, we find that well-matched treatments that result in the greatest mechanical compromise in vitro induce the least dispersal ex vivo. Moreover, we find that generic glycoside hydrolases have no measurable effect on the mechanics of biofilms grown in vitro, while previous work has shown them to be highly effective at inducing dispersal in vivo and ex vivo. This highlights the possibility that effective approaches to eradicating biofilms may depend strongly on the growth environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31990563      PMCID: PMC7063831          DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  49 in total

1.  Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Cynthia B Whitchurch; Tim Tolker-Nielsen; Paula C Ragas; John S Mattick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ashley Alwood; Iyarit Thaipisuttikul; David Spencer; Eric Haugen; Stephen Ernst; Oliver Will; Rajinder Kaul; Christopher Raymond; Ruth Levy; Liu Chun-Rong; Donald Guenthner; Donald Bovee; Maynard V Olson; Colin Manoil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent therapeutic window.

Authors:  R D Wolcott; K P Rumbaugh; G James; G Schultz; P Phillips; Q Yang; C Watters; P S Stewart; S E Dowd
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.072

4.  Biofilm-control strategies based on enzymic disruption of the extracellular polymeric substance matrix--a modelling study.

Authors:  Joao B Xavier; Cristian Picioreanu; Suriani Abdul Rani; Mark C M van Loosdrecht; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Self-organization of bacterial biofilms is facilitated by extracellular DNA.

Authors:  Erin S Gloag; Lynne Turnbull; Alan Huang; Pascal Vallotton; Huabin Wang; Laura M Nolan; Lisa Mililli; Cameron Hunt; Jing Lu; Sarah R Osvath; Leigh G Monahan; Rosalia Cavaliere; Ian G Charles; Matt P Wand; Michelle L Gee; Ranganathan Prabhakar; Cynthia B Whitchurch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mouse models to study wound closure and topical treatment of infected wounds in healing-impaired and normal healing hosts.

Authors:  R L Brown; D G Greenhalgh
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  1997 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Role of alginate O acetylation in resistance of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa to opsonic phagocytosis.

Authors:  G B Pier; F Coleman; M Grout; M Franklin; D E Ohman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Alginate lyase exhibits catalysis-independent biofilm dispersion and antibiotic synergy.

Authors:  John W Lamppa; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Phenotypes of non-attached Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates resemble surface attached biofilm.

Authors:  Morten Alhede; Kasper Nørskov Kragh; Klaus Qvortrup; Marie Allesen-Holm; Maria van Gennip; Louise D Christensen; Peter Østrup Jensen; Anne K Nielsen; Matt Parsek; Dan Wozniak; Søren Molin; Tim Tolker-Nielsen; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov; Thomas Bjarnsholt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Exopolysaccharide biosynthetic glycoside hydrolases can be utilized to disrupt and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Perrin Baker; Preston J Hill; Brendan D Snarr; Noor Alnabelseya; Matthew J Pestrak; Mark J Lee; Laura K Jennings; John Tam; Roman A Melnyk; Matthew R Parsek; Donald C Sheppard; Daniel J Wozniak; P Lynne Howell
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of antibiofilm potential of four-domain α-amylase from Streptomyces griseus against exopolysaccharides (EPS) of bacterial pathogens using Danio rerio.

Authors:  Rajaiah Alexpandi; Raja Mohamed Beema Shafreen; Kannapiran Tamilmuhilan; Adimoolam Srivathsan; Selvaraj Alagu Lakshmi; Thirupathi Kasthuri; Arumugam Veera Ravi; Sugathan Shiburaj; Shunmugiah Karutha Pandian
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  High-throughput assays show the timescale for phagocytic success depends on the target toughness.

Authors:  Layla A Bakhtiari; Marilyn J Wells; Vernita D Gordon
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2021-09-30

3.  Effect of collagen and EPS components on the viscoelasticity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Minhaz Ur Rahman; Derek F Fleming; Indranil Sinha; Kendra P Rumbaugh; Vernita D Gordon; Gordon F Christopher
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Efficacy and safety of biofilm dispersal by glycoside hydrolases in wounds.

Authors:  Whitni K Redman; Garrett S Welch; Avery C Williams; Addyson J Damron; Willem O Northcut; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  Biofilm       Date:  2021-11-13

5.  Antibacterial efficacy and possible mechanism of action of 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid (HICA).

Authors:  Amila S N W Pahalagedara; Steve Flint; Jon Palmer; Gale Brightwell; Tanushree B Gupta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Microrheology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown in wound beds.

Authors:  Minhaz Ur Rahman; Derek F Fleming; Liyun Wang; Kendra P Rumbaugh; Vernita D Gordon; Gordon F Christopher
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 8.462

Review 7.  Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infectious biofilms: Challenges and strategies.

Authors:  Rui Yin; Juanli Cheng; Jingyao Wang; Panxin Li; Jinshui Lin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  The Innate Immune Protein Calprotectin Interacts With and Encases Biofilm Communities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jiwasmika Baishya; Jake A Everett; Walter J Chazin; Kendra P Rumbaugh; Catherine A Wakeman
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.073

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.