Marianne Lagarde1,2,3, Elsa Vennat3,4, Jean-Pierre Attal1,3,5, Elisabeth Dursun1,2,3. 1. Faculty of Dental Surgery, Paris Descartes University, Montrouge, France. 2. Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France. 3. Innovative Dental Materials and Interfaces Research Unit (EA 4462), Montrouge, France. 4. Centrale-Supélec, MSSMat Laboratory, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 5. Charles Foix Hospital, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children with first permanent molar affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) show high treatment failure rate. AIM: To conduct a systematic review on bonding of adhesive materials to MIH-affected enamel, so as to identify all the methods suggested to optimize it and to determine the best bonding protocol(s). DESIGN: An exhaustive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, up to October 2018. Laboratory and clinical studies, involving adhesive restorations bonded to MIH-affected enamel, with at least a comparative group were included. Two authors independently selected studies, collected data, and assessed bias risk. RESULTS: After title and abstract review and duplicate exclusion, 14 articles were selected on the 496 eligible papers. After full reading, 4 articles were excluded. Finally, 10 studies (6 laboratory and 4 clinical studies) were included. CONCLUSIONS: Bond strength of composite was not significantly different when using self-etch compared with etch-and-rinse adhesives. Deproteinization after etching for etch-and-rinse adhesives enhanced bond strength; this could allow to keep MIH-affected enamel. Icon® showed an erratic penetration; however, a preliminary deproteinization after etching could improve bond strength. A study reported no significant differences in sealant retention rate, whereas another recommended to previously apply an adhesive.
BACKGROUND:Children with first permanent molar affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) show high treatment failure rate. AIM: To conduct a systematic review on bonding of adhesive materials to MIH-affected enamel, so as to identify all the methods suggested to optimize it and to determine the best bonding protocol(s). DESIGN: An exhaustive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, up to October 2018. Laboratory and clinical studies, involving adhesive restorations bonded to MIH-affected enamel, with at least a comparative group were included. Two authors independently selected studies, collected data, and assessed bias risk. RESULTS: After title and abstract review and duplicate exclusion, 14 articles were selected on the 496 eligible papers. After full reading, 4 articles were excluded. Finally, 10 studies (6 laboratory and 4 clinical studies) were included. CONCLUSIONS: Bond strength of composite was not significantly different when using self-etch compared with etch-and-rinse adhesives. Deproteinization after etching for etch-and-rinse adhesives enhanced bond strength; this could allow to keep MIH-affected enamel. Icon® showed an erratic penetration; however, a preliminary deproteinization after etching could improve bond strength. A study reported no significant differences in sealant retention rate, whereas another recommended to previously apply an adhesive.
Authors: Rita Maria Delgado; João Botelho; Vanessa Machado; José João Mendes; Luísa Bandeira Lopes Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Clara Serna-Muñoz; Yolanda Martínez-Beneyto; Amparo Pérez-Silva; Andrea Poza-Pascual; Francisco Javier Ibáñez-López; Antonio José Ortiz-Ruiz Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 2.757