| Literature DB >> 31990088 |
Céline Jézéquel1, Pablo A Tedesco1, William Darwall2, Murilo S Dias3, Renata G Frederico4, Max Hidalgo5, Bernard Hugueny1, Javier Maldonado-Ocampo6, Koen Martens7,8, Hernan Ortega5, Gislene Torrente-Vilara9, Jansen Zuanon10, Thierry Oberdorff1.
Abstract
Conserving freshwater habitats and their biodiversity in the Amazon Basin is a growing challenge in the face of rapid anthropogenic changes. We used the most comprehensive fish-occurrence database available (2355 valid species; 21,248 sampling points) and 3 ecological criteria (irreplaceability, representativeness, and vulnerability) to identify biodiversity hotspots based on 6 conservation templates (3 proactive, 1 reactive, 1 representative, and 1 balanced) to provide a set of alternative planning solutions for freshwater fish protection in the Amazon Basin. We identified empirically for each template the 17% of sub-basins that should be conserved and performed a prioritization analysis by identifying current and future (2050) threats (i.e., degree of deforestation and habitat fragmentation by dams). Two of our 3 proactive templates had around 65% of their surface covered by protected areas; high levels of irreplaceability (60% of endemics) and representativeness (71% of the Amazonian fish fauna); and low current and future vulnerability. These 2 templates, then, seemed more robust for conservation prioritization. The future of the selected sub-basins in these 2 proactive templates is not immediately threatened by human activities, and these sub-basins host the largest part of Amazonian biodiversity. They could easily be conserved if no additional threats occur between now and 2050.Entities:
Keywords: conservation scenarios; freshwater biodiversity; neotropics; spatial prioritization
Year: 2020 PMID: 31990088 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Biol ISSN: 0888-8892 Impact factor: 6.560