Literature DB >> 31989966

Validity and diagnostic accuracy of foot posture Index-6 using radiographic findings as the gold standard to determine paediatric flexible flatfoot between ages of 6-18 years: A cross-sectional study.

Fatma A Hegazy1, Emad A Aboelnasr2, Yasser Salem3, Ashraf A Zaghloul4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of flexible flatfoot is usually based upon radiographic or clinical measures. Radiographic measures pose a potential risk of radiation exposure especially in Paediatric population. Clinicians need a valid, accurate, easily used, noninvasive and cost effective measure to evaluate static foot posture clinically. Although, foot posture index-6 (FPI-6) are commonly used in clinical practice, its validity and diagnostic accuracy in evaluation of paediatric flexible flatfoot have not been fully proven yet.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate validity and diagnostic accuracy of FPI-6 to determine Paediatric flexible flatfoot between ages of 6-18 years using radiographic findings as the gold standard measure. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted on 612 participants (1224 feet) with flexible flatfoot aged 6-18 years (mean age ± standard deviation of 12.36 ± 3.39 years). The results of FPI-6 were compared to the gold standard radiographic measures and displayed on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Intra-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. Posttest probability was calculated from Fagan nomogram.
RESULTS: FPI-6 demonstrate high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.96) with p value < 0.001. FPI-6 showed a sensitivity of 83.7%, a specificity of 80.4, a positive predictive value of 64.7, a negative predictive value of 92, a positive likelihood ratio of 4.62 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.20. FPI-6 shows moderate diagnostic accuracy [AUC = 0.82; 95%CI (0.78-0.85)].
CONCLUSION: FPI-6 is valid with moderate diagnostic accuracy to determine paediatric flexible flatfoot between ages of 6-18 years.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Children; Diagnostic accuracy; Flatfoot; Foot posture index-6; Validation; X-ray

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31989966     DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract        ISSN: 2468-7812            Impact factor:   2.520


  4 in total

1.  Foot posture index and body composition measures in children with and without developmental coordination disorder.

Authors:  Timothy Tsz Ting Yam; Shirley Siu Ming Fong; William Wai Nam Tsang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke's Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation.

Authors:  Fatma Hegazy; Emad Aboelnasr; Mohamed Abuzaid; In-Ju Kim; Yasser Salem
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-09-27

3.  Foot Assessment Clinical Scales in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Chiara Rambelli; Davide Mazzoli; Martina Galletti; Giacomo Basini; Paolo Zerbinati; Paolo Prati; Francesca Mascioli; Stefano Masiero; Andrea Merlo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Comparison of multiple flatfoot indicators in 5-8-year-old children.

Authors:  Saidas Žukauskas; Vidmantas Barauskas; Emilis Čekanauskas
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-02-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.