| Literature DB >> 31989777 |
Li Yang1, Ye Gu1, Hai Wang1, Dongmei Yu1, Haiping Zhang2, Hao Wang1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ProCore 25-gauge needle is a novel specifically designed puncture needle for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), which may improve the puncture efficiency of the procedure while ensuring the diagnostic rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, mRNA yield, and complication rate of 25-gauge needles compared to those of 22-gauge needles in the evaluation of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy.Entities:
Keywords: Endobronchial ultrasound; RNA concentration; hilar lymphadenopathy; mRNA extraction; transbronchial needle aspiration
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31989777 PMCID: PMC7049504 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
Figure 1The flowchart of the procedure.
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients
| Characteristics | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Age, years, median (range) | 63 (43–73) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 20 (51%) |
| Female | 19 (49%) |
| Anesthesia | |
| General anesthesia | 9 (23%) |
| Local anesthesia | 30 (77%) |
| Number of sampled LNs for each patient | |
| 2 | 29 (74%) |
| 3 | 10 (26%) |
| The stations of sampled LNs | |
| 2 | 1 (1%) |
| 4 | 37 (42%) |
| 7 | 23 (26%) |
| 10 | 9 (11%) |
| 11 | 18 (20%) |
LNs, lymph nodes.
Figure 2(a) Chest computed tomography scan before bronchoscopic examination (the arrow points to the punctured lymph node). (b) The ultrasonogram of the target lymph node punctured by the ProCore needle.
Pathological diagnostic results of all sampled lymph nodes by the traditional 22‐gauge needle and novel 25‐gauge needle
| Traditional 22‐gauge needle | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adenocarcinoma | Squamous | NSCLC | SCLC | Malignant tumor cells | Negative | ||
| Novel 25‐gauge needle | |||||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 3 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 22 |
| Squamous cells | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| NSCLC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| SCLC | 5 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 30 |
| Malignant tumor cells | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Negative | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Total | 22 | 6 | 16 | 31 | 4 | 9 | 88 |
NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer.
Complications and puncture time
| Novel 25‐gauge needle | Traditional 22‐gauge needle | |
|---|---|---|
| Complications | ||
| Bleeding | 12 (31%) | 15 (38%) |
| No intervention necessary | 11 (28%) | 11 (28%) |
| Local hemostasis with thrombin | 1 (3%) | 4 (10%) |
| SO2 decrease | 2 (5%) | 3 (8%) |
| >80% | 2 (5%) | 3 (8%) |
| Mean time per puncture (minutes) | 5 | 4 |
Figure 3The mRNA concentration between the traditional 22‐gauge needle and novel 25‐gauge needle.
Figure 4The unique design of the CoreTrap for the ProCore 25‐gauge needle.