Joe Iwanaga1,2, Mary Katherine Cleveland3, Junichiro Wada4, R Shane Tubbs5,6,7. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. iwanagajoeca@gmail.com. 2. Dental and Oral Medical Center, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan. iwanagajoeca@gmail.com. 3. Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA. 4. Section of Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. 6. Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada. 7. Department of Structural and Cellular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the retromolar gland and pad, and the relationship between the LN and retromolar gland/pad to establish a new landmark for avoiding LN injury. METHODS: Sixty-two lingual nerves from fresh-frozen cadavers were used for this study. The age of the specimens at the time of death ranged from 57 to 98 with a mean of 76.5 years. The mucous incision was made into the medial border of the retromolar pad and the submucosal tissue depth of the initial incision was bluntly dissected to expose the lingual nerve. When the LN was identified, the mucosa overlying the retromolar pad was removed to expose the retromolar gland to confirm if the retromolar pad corresponds to the retromolar gland. RESULTS: On all sides, the lingual nerve was found to course medial to the retromolar pad and inferior to the inferior border of the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle to enter the sublingual space via the pterygomandibular space. The retromolar pad corresponded to the retromolar gland on all sides. This demonstrated that the retromolar pad is an overlying mucosa of the retromolar gland. No LN was found to travel through the retromolar gland. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the retromolar pad can be used as a new landmark for avoiding iatrogenic LN injury.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the retromolar gland and pad, and the relationship between the LN and retromolar gland/pad to establish a new landmark for avoiding LN injury. METHODS: Sixty-two lingual nerves from fresh-frozen cadavers were used for this study. The age of the specimens at the time of death ranged from 57 to 98 with a mean of 76.5 years. The mucous incision was made into the medial border of the retromolar pad and the submucosal tissue depth of the initial incision was bluntly dissected to expose the lingual nerve. When the LN was identified, the mucosa overlying the retromolar pad was removed to expose the retromolar gland to confirm if the retromolar pad corresponds to the retromolar gland. RESULTS: On all sides, the lingual nerve was found to course medial to the retromolar pad and inferior to the inferior border of the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle to enter the sublingual space via the pterygomandibular space. The retromolar pad corresponded to the retromolar gland on all sides. This demonstrated that the retromolar pad is an overlying mucosa of the retromolar gland. No LN was found to travel through the retromolar gland. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the retromolar pad can be used as a new landmark for avoiding iatrogenic LN injury.