Literature DB >> 31988580

Perforator Dissection Simulation: A High-Fidelity Five-Flap Porcine Training Model.

Yildirim Oezdogan1, Charles Yuen Yung Loh2,3,4, Nora Prochnow5, Marcus Lehnhardt5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Perforator dissection can be technically demanding with a steep learning curve. Inadvertent perforator damage during dissection can be minimized with practice and familiarity with tissue-handling techniques unique to perforator dissection. There currently lacks a simulation model that mimics the human perforator in size and course. We present a porcine training model with five consistent perforator flaps per side that can be readily harvested and is a reproducible simulation model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five fresh cadaveric pigs were used in this study to evaluate the feasibility and location of the perforators. Ten perforators were dissected out in each pig (five per side) by the same surgeon. The length of perforator was measured and intramuscular route was noted. The ease of dissection was graded, and its similarity to actual surgery was graded as well.
RESULTS: Five consistent perforators were identified across each side of five fresh cadaveric pigs. The perforators were located, namely in the neck, anterior flank, posterior flank, rectus and hindlimb. They were fasciocutaneous and had an intramuscular course of each (average 2.5 cm length). The perforators were found to be on each side of the pig, giving ten perforators for dissection practice in total. DISCUSSION: The five perforators named in this porcine model are easily replicated and can be performed for perforator dissection simulation and practice. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flap; Flap surgery; Pig model; Plastic surgery; Porcine perforator flap dissection; Surgical simulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31988580      PMCID: PMC6954924          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01220-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the efficacy of microsurgical practice through time factor added protocol: microsurgical training using nonvital material.

Authors:  Jong Won Hong; Young Seok Kim; Won Jai Lee; Hyun Joon Hong; Tai Suk Roh; Seung Yong Song
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  The chicken foot digital replant training model.

Authors:  Thanassi Athanassopoulos; Charles Yuen Yung Loh
Journal:  Hand Surg       Date:  2015

3.  Experience of plastic surgery registrars in a European Working Time Directive compliant rota.

Authors:  Catherine de Blacam; Sean Tierney; Odhran Shelley
Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2016-10-20

Review 4.  Simulation in surgery: a review.

Authors:  Shaun Shi Yan Tan; Sudip K Sarker
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.729

5.  Cadavers versus pigs: which are better for procedural training of surgery residents outside the OR?

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Thomas C Yonce; John M Green; Aikaterini P Coker
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Pinnaplasty: a porcine training model.

Authors:  Charles Yuen Yung Loh; Eilidh Gunn; David John Laurie Pennell; Thanassi Athanassopoulos
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Microsurgery training--a home do-it-yourself model.

Authors:  Charles Yuen Yung Loh; Vincent Tze Yang Tiong; Alex Yuen Hua Loh; Thanassi Athanassopoulos
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.425

Review 8.  Evidence-based microsurgical skill-acquisition series part 1: validated microsurgical models--a systematic review.

Authors:  Danielle Dumestre; Justin K Yeung; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 9.  Animal models in plastic and reconstructive surgery simulation-a review.

Authors:  Charles Yuen Yung Loh; Aline Yen Ling Wang; Vincent Tze Yang Tiong; Thanassi Athanassopoulos; Meiling Loh; Philip Lim; Huang-Kai Kao
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.192

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.