Literature DB >> 31988440

A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change.

Tabea Hässler1, Johannes Ullrich2, Michelle Bernardino3, Nurit Shnabel4, Colette Van Laar5, Daniel Valdenegro6, Simone Sebben2, Linda R Tropp7, Emilio Paolo Visintin8,9, Roberto González3, Ruth K Ditlmann10, Dominic Abrams11, Hema Preya Selvanathan7,12, Marija Branković13, Stephen Wright14, Jorina von Zimmermann15, Michael Pasek16,17, Anna Lisa Aydin18, Iris Žeželj19, Adrienne Pereira8, Nóra Anna Lantos20, Mario Sainz21,22, Andreas Glenz2, Hana Oberpfalzerová23, Michal Bilewicz24, Anna Kende20, Olga Kuzawinska24, Sabine Otten25, Edona Maloku26, Masi Noor27, Pelin Gul28, Jessica Pistella29, Roberto Baiocco29, Margareta Jelic30, Evgeny Osin31, Orly Bareket4, Dinka Corkalo Biruski30, Jonathan E Cook32, Maneeza Dawood33, Lisa Droogendyk34, Angélica Herrera Loyo35, Kaltrina Kelmendi36, Luiza Mugnol Ugarte37.   

Abstract

Guided by the early findings of social scientists, practitioners have long advocated for greater contact between groups to reduce prejudice and increase social cohesion. Recent work, however, suggests that intergroup contact can undermine support for social change towards greater equality, especially among disadvantaged group members. Using a large and heterogeneous dataset (12,997 individuals from 69 countries), we demonstrate that intergroup contact and support for social change towards greater equality are positively associated among members of advantaged groups (ethnic majorities and cis-heterosexuals) but negatively associated among disadvantaged groups (ethnic minorities and sexual and gender minorities). Specification-curve analysis revealed important variation in the size-and at times, direction-of correlations, depending on how contact and support for social change were measured. This allowed us to identify one type of support for change-willingness to work in solidarity- that is positively associated with intergroup contact among both advantaged and disadvantaged group members.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31988440     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  6 in total

1.  Speaking my truth: Why personal experiences can bridge divides but mislead.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Diego A Reinero; Victoria Spring; Elizabeth A Harris; Annie Duke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Applying the Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping to Collective Action Among Advantaged Group Allies and Disadvantaged Group Members.

Authors:  Helena R M Radke; Maja Kutlaca; Julia C Becker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Social Support and Internalizing Psychopathology in Transgender Youth.

Authors:  Lily Durwood; Léïla Eisner; Kaitlyn Fladeboe; Chonghui Gabriella Ji; Samantha Barney; Katie A McLaughlin; Kristina R Olson
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2021-02-11

4.  News media impact on sociopolitical attitudes.

Authors:  Megan Earle; Gordon Hodson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Perceptions of intolerant norms both facilitate and inhibit collective action among sexual minorities.

Authors:  Léïla Eisner; Richard Settersten; Felicity Turner-Zwinkels; Tabea Hässler
Journal:  Group Process Intergroup Relat       Date:  2021-07-20

6.  The social cohesion investment: Communities that invested in integration programmes are showing greater social cohesion in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Fanny Lalot; Dominic Abrams; Jo Broadwood; Kaya Davies Hayon; Isobel Platts-Dunn
Journal:  J Community Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2021-04-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.