Literature DB >> 31988079

The Repressor Function of the Chlamydia Late Regulator EUO Is Enhanced by the Plasmid-Encoded Protein Pgp4.

Qiang Zhang1,2, Christopher J Rosario2, Lauren M Sheehan2, Syed M Rizvi2, Julie A Brothwell2, Cheng He1, Ming Tan3,4.   

Abstract

A critical step in intracellular Chlamydia infection is the production of infectious progeny through the expression of late genes. This differentiation step involves conversion from a reticulate body (RB), which is the replicating form of the bacterium, into an elementary body (EB), which is the developmental form that spreads the infection to a new host cell. EUO is an important chlamydial transcription factor that controls the expression of late genes, but the mechanisms that regulate EUO are not known. We report that a plasmid-encoded protein, Pgp4, enhanced the repressor activity of EUO. Pgp4 did not function as a transcription factor because it did not bind or directly modulate transcription of its target promoters. Instead, Pgp4 increased the ability of EUO to bind and repress EUO-regulated promoters in vitro and physically interacted with EUO in pulldown assays with recombinant proteins. We detected earlier onset of EUO-dependent late gene expression by immunofluorescence microscopy in Pgp4-deficient C. trachomatis and C. muridarum strains. In addition, the absence of Pgp4 led to earlier onset of RB-to-EB conversion in C. muridarum These data support a role for Pgp4 as a negative regulator of chlamydial transcription that delays late gene expression. Our studies revealed that Pgp4 also has an EUO-independent function as a positive regulator of chlamydial transcription.IMPORTANCE Chlamydia trachomatis is an important human pathogen that causes more than 150 million active cases of genital and eye infection in the world. This obligate intracellular bacterium produces infectious progeny within an infected human cell through the expression of late chlamydial genes. We showed that the ability of a key chlamydial transcription factor, EUO, to repress late genes was enhanced by a plasmid-encoded protein, Pgp4. In addition, studies with Chlamydia Pgp4-deficient strains provide evidence that Pgp4 delays late gene expression in infected cells. Thus, Pgp4 is a novel regulator of late gene expression in Chlamydia through its ability to enhance the repressor function of EUO.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydiazzm321990; EUO; Pgp4; RB-EB conversion; cofactor; late gene expression; plasmid; repressor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31988079      PMCID: PMC7099128          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00793-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  39 in total

1.  Regulation of Chlamydia Gene Expression by Tandem Promoters with Different Temporal Patterns.

Authors:  Christopher J Rosario; Ming Tan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Nucleoid condensation in Escherichia coli that express a chlamydial histone homolog.

Authors:  C E Barry; S F Hayes; T Hackstadt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Role for GrgA in Regulation of σ28-Dependent Transcription in the Obligate Intracellular Bacterial Pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Malhar Desai; Wurihan Wurihan; Rong Di; Joseph D Fondell; Bryce E Nickels; Xiaofeng Bao; Huizhou Fan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Cleavage of a putative metal permease in Chlamydia trachomatis yields an iron-dependent transcriptional repressor.

Authors:  Christopher C Thompson; Sophie S Nicod; Denise S Malcolm; Scott S Grieshaber; Rey A Carabeo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Functional analysis of the heat shock regulator HrcA of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Adam C Wilson; Ming Tan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  A developmentally regulated two-component signal transduction system in Chlamydia.

Authors:  Ingrid Chou Koo; Richard S Stephens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  In vivo and in vitro studies of Chlamydia trachomatis TrpR:DNA interactions.

Authors:  John H Carlson; Heidi Wood; Christine Roshick; Harlan D Caldwell; Grant McClarty
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Exploration of chlamydial type III secretion system reconstitution in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Bao; Wandy L Beatty; Huizhou Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Replication-dependent size reduction precedes differentiation in Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Jennifer K Lee; Germán A Enciso; Daniela Boassa; Christopher N Chander; Tracy H Lou; Sean S Pairawan; Melody C Guo; Frederic Y M Wan; Mark H Ellisman; Christine Sütterlin; Ming Tan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Co-evolution of genomes and plasmids within Chlamydia trachomatis and the emergence in Sweden of a new variant strain.

Authors:  Helena M B Seth-Smith; Simon R Harris; Kenneth Persson; Pete Marsh; Andrew Barron; Alexandra Bignell; Carina Bjartling; Louise Clark; Lesley T Cutcliffe; Paul R Lambden; Nicola Lennard; Sarah J Lockey; Michael A Quail; Omar Salim; Rachel J Skilton; Yibing Wang; Martin J Holland; Julian Parkhill; Nicholas R Thomson; Ian N Clarke
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Chlamydia overcomes multiple gastrointestinal barriers to achieve long-lasting colonization.

Authors:  Guangming Zhong
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 17.079

2.  Translational gene expression control in Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Nicole A Grieshaber; Travis J Chiarelli; Cody R Appa; Grace Neiswanger; Kristina Peretti; Scott S Grieshaber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Robust Heat Shock Response in Chlamydia Lacking a Typical Heat Shock Sigma Factor.

Authors:  Yehong Huang; Wurihan Wurihan; Bin Lu; Yi Zou; Yuxuan Wang; Korri Weldon; Joseph D Fondell; Zhao Lai; Xiang Wu; Huizhou Fan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.