Literature DB >> 31987805

Differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses using multiparametric MRI.

S Türkoğlu1, M Kayan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the capabilities of multiparametric MRI including dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to discriminate between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
METHODS: A total of 43 women with a total of 43 ovarian masses were retrospectively included. They had a mean age of 51.26±18.05 (SD) years (range: 20-88years). Twenty women had benign and 23 had malignant ovarian tumors. All women had multiparametric MRI examinations including DWI (b50-b800) and DCE perfusion imaging at 1-5T. Results of DWI (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], b-800) and DCE imaging (volume transfer coefficient [Ktrans], rate constant [Kep], interstitial volume [Ve], initial area under the curve [iAUC]) were compared between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
RESULTS: Mean ADC was significantly lowed in malignant tumors (0.92±0.25 [SD]×10-3 mm2/s (range: 0.6-1.6×10-3 mm2/s) than in benign tumors (1.37±0.69 [SD]×10-3 mm2/s; range: 0.4-2.9×10-3 mm2/s) (P=0.011). B-800 was significantly greater in malignant tumors (80.61±24.73 [SD] s/mm2; range: 24-110 s/mm2) than in benign ones (61.15±22.17 [SD] s/mm2; range: 38-155 s/mm2) (P=0.010). Ktrans was lower in benign tumors (0.13±0.06 [SD] min-1; range: 0-0.2min-1) than in malignant ones (0.25±0.16 [SD] min-1; range: 0.1-0.8min-1) (P=0.002). Kep was significantly greater in malignant tumors (0.55±0.19 [SD] min-1; range: 0.1-1.9min-1) than in benign ones (0.44±0.38 [SD] min-1; range: 0.2-1.1min-1) (P=0.003). iAUC was greater in malignant tumors (15.59±7.98 [SD] mM/min; range: 6.6-42.1mM/min) than in benign ones (7.98±5.06 [SD] mM/min; range: 0.2-17.7mM/min) (P=0.001). No differences in Ve were found between benign and malignant masses (P=0.084). The area under the ROC curve was significant for all parameters but Ve. Logistic regression analysis revealed 5.590 and 11.637 times higher malignancy risk for an ADC≤0.93×10-3 mm2/s and an iAUC≥13.88mM/min, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MRI has high accuracy in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses. Therefore, adding these methods to the more common MRI protocol can help select the best treatment option in women with ovarian mass.
Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); Dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) perfusion; Logistic models; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Ovarian neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31987805     DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging        ISSN: 2211-5684            Impact factor:   4.026


  6 in total

1.  Nomograms of Combining MRI Multisequences Radiomics and Clinical Factors for Differentiating High-Grade From Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Cuiping Li; Hongfei Wang; Yulan Chen; Chao Zhu; Yankun Gao; Xia Wang; Jiangning Dong; Xingwang Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging.

Authors:  Domenico Albano; Federico Bruno; Andrea Agostini; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Massimo Benenati; Giulia Bicchierai; Michaela Cellina; Vito Chianca; Diletta Cozzi; Ginevra Danti; Federica De Muzio; Letizia Di Meglio; Francesco Gentili; Giuliana Giacobbe; Giulia Grazzini; Irene Grazzini; Pasquale Guerriero; Carmelo Messina; Giuseppe Micci; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Maria Paola Rocco; Roberto Grassi; Vittorio Miele; Antonio Barile
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xianwen Hu; Zhigang Liang; Chuanqin Zhang; Guanlian Wang; Jiong Cai; Pan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Quantification of ovarian lesion and fallopian tube vasculature using optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy.

Authors:  Xiandong Leng; Sitai Kou; Yixiao Lin; Andrea R Hagemann; Ian S Hagemann; Premal H Thaker; Lindsay M Kuroki; Carolyn K McCourt; David G Mutch; Cary Siegel; Matthew A Powell; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Bimodal magnetic resonance and optical imaging of extracellular matrix remodelling by orthotopic ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Filip Bochner; Liat Fellus-Alyagor; Dafna Ketter; Ofra Golani; Inbal Biton; Michal Neeman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ovarian Cancer: Exploiting Strengths and Understanding Limitations.

Authors:  Tanja Gagliardi; Margaret Adejolu; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.