Literature DB >> 31987607

Medial wall fragment involving large posterior cortex in pertrochanteric femur fractures: a notable preoperative risk factor for implant failure.

Pengfei Li1, Yang Lv1, Fang Zhou2, Yun Tian1, Hongquan Ji1, Zhishan Zhang1, Yan Guo1, Zhongwei Yang1, Guojin Hou1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To introduce a classification for medial wall fragments in pertrochanteric femur fractures and investigate potential preoperative predictors of implant failure following fixation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of 324 adult patients receiving routine operative treatment using intramedullary devices for pertrochanteric femur fractures with medial wall fragments between August 2008 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Potential predictors including age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, AO/OTA classification of fractures were noted. The medial wall fractures were categorized into three types: 1) Type I: avulsion of the lesser trochanter; fracture line does not exceed the base of the lesser trochanter; 2) Type II: fragment involving the posterior cortex near the base of the lesser trochanter; fracture line does not reach the midline of the posterior wall; 3) Type III: fragment involving the large posterior cortex; fracture line reaches or exceeds the midline of the posterior wall.
RESULTS: The 8 (2.5%) implant failures comprised 1 in 186 Type I fractures, 1 in 76 Type II fractures and 6 in 62 Type III fractures. The failure rates of each fracture type were 0.5% in Type I, 1.3% in Type II and significantly increased to 9.7% in Type III (odds ratio [OR], 19.821; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.337-168.135; p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Type III fractures had a significantly increased failure rate. It is important for orthopedists to identify Type III fractures presurgically, reduction of the medial wall fragment and fixation should be considered during surgery using intramedullary nails.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Femoral fracture; Implant failure; Medial wall fragment; Pertrochanteric

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31987607     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  Recognition and Segmentation of Individual Bone Fragments with a Deep Learning Approach in CT Scans of Complex Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Lv Yang; Shan Gao; Pengfei Li; Jiancheng Shi; Fang Zhou
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  When to Reduce and Fix Displaced Lesser Trochanter in Treatment of Trochanteric Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ao-Lei Yang; Wei Mao; Jun-Guo Wu; Yi-Qun He; Hao-Fei Ni; Hai-Long Li; You-Hai Dong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-25

3.  CalTAD is the Key Evaluation Tool for Measurement of Cephalic Fixation Position for Predicting Cut-Out in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients with Internal Fixations after Achieving Acceptable Reduction.

Authors:  Yun-Fa Yang; Jian-Wen Huang; Xiao-Sheng Gao
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-29

4.  In Silico Finite Element Modeling of Stress Distribution in Osteosynthesis after Pertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Jacek Lorkowski; Mieczyslaw Pokorski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Risk factors for cut-outs in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with cephalomedullary nailing after obtaining acceptable reduction: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jian-Wen Huang; Xiao-Sheng Gao; Yun-Fa Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.