Literature DB >> 31985630

Can You Trust What You Watch? An Assessment of the Quality of Information in Aesthetic Surgery Videos on YouTube.

Megan C Gray1, Amanda Gemmiti, Ashar Ata, Brandon Jun, Philip K Johnson, Joseph A Ricci, Ashit Patel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Videos on YouTube can be posted without regulation or content oversight. Unfortunately, many patients use YouTube as a resource on aesthetic surgery, leading to misinformation. Currently, there are no objective assessments of the quality of information on YouTube about aesthetic surgery.
METHODS: YouTube was queried for videos about the 12 most common aesthetic surgical procedures, identified from the 2015 American Society of Plastic Surgeons procedural statistics between May and June of 2016. The top 25 results for each search term were scored using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients criteria based on video structure, content, and author identification. Average Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score, view count, and video duration were compared between authorship groups.
RESULTS: A total of 523 videos were graded after excluding duplicates. The mean modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score for all videos was 13.1 (SE, 0.18) of a possible 27. The videos under the search "nose reshaping" had the lowest mean score of 10.24 (SE, 0.74), whereas "breast augmentation" had the highest score of 15.96 (SE, 0.65). Physician authorship accounted for 59 percent of included videos and had a higher mean Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score than those by patients. Only three of the 21 search terms had a mean modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score meeting criteria for high-quality videos.
CONCLUSIONS: The information contained in aesthetic surgery videos on YouTube is low quality. Patients should be aware that the information has the potential to be inaccurate. Plastic surgeons should be encouraged to develop high-quality videos to educate patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31985630     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

Review 1.  Social Media and Plastic Surgery Practice Building: A Thin Line Between Efficient Marketing, Professionalism, and Ethics.

Authors:  Bishara S Atiyeh; Fadel Chahine; Odette Abou Ghanem
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  "For the 'Gram: A Deconstruction of Influential Plastic Surgeon Instagram Posts".

Authors:  Michael W Wells; Irene A Chang; James R Gatherwright; Heather J Furnas
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Mining the Twittersphere: Insights about Public Interest in Facial Reanimation Surgery from a Decade of Twitter Data.

Authors:  Hayeem L Rudy; Joseph A Ricci
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-12-13

4.  Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Gender-affirming Surgery Videos on YouTube and TikTok.

Authors:  Siyou Song; Keon Min Park; Kiet Phong; Esther A Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.