Joseph Peterson1, Carla Nishimura1, Richard J H Smith1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Labs, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the prevalence of children with genetic hearing loss who are cytomegalovirus (CMV) positive at birth and the relative proportion of genetic and CMV etiology among children with congenital bilateral hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Database review. METHODS: We performed a review of clinical test results for patients undergoing comprehensive genetic testing for all known hearing loss-associated genes from January 2012 to January 2019. This population was reviewed for reported CMV status and genetic causes of congenital bilateral hearing loss. RESULTS: In the OtoSCOPE database, 61/4,282 patients were found to have a documented CMV status, and 661/4282 had documented bilateral congenital hearing loss. Two patients were identified who had both a positive CMV result and a genetic cause for their hearing loss. Forty-eight percent of patients with bilateral congenital hearing loss (320/661) were found to have a genetic etiology. In 62% (198/320), the hearing loss was associated with pathogenic variants in GJB2, STRC, SLC26A4 or an Usher syndrome-associated gene. CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that ~2% of CMV-positive newborns with hearing loss have a known genetic variant as a cause. The subcohort of CMV-positive newborns with symmetric mild-to-moderate bilateral hearing loss will have at least a 7% chance of having pathogenic gene variants associated with hearing loss. In a CMV-positive neonate who failed their newborn hearing screen bilaterally, genetic screening needs to be considered for accurate diagnosis and possible deferment of antiviral treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2714-2718, 2020.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the prevalence of children with genetic hearing loss who are cytomegalovirus (CMV) positive at birth and the relative proportion of genetic and CMV etiology among children with congenital bilateral hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Database review. METHODS: We performed a review of clinical test results for patients undergoing comprehensive genetic testing for all known hearing loss-associated genes from January 2012 to January 2019. This population was reviewed for reported CMV status and genetic causes of congenital bilateral hearing loss. RESULTS: In the OtoSCOPE database, 61/4,282 patients were found to have a documented CMV status, and 661/4282 had documented bilateral congenital hearing loss. Two patients were identified who had both a positive CMV result and a genetic cause for their hearing loss. Forty-eight percent of patients with bilateral congenital hearing loss (320/661) were found to have a genetic etiology. In 62% (198/320), the hearing loss was associated with pathogenic variants in GJB2, STRC, SLC26A4 or an Usher syndrome-associated gene. CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that ~2% of CMV-positive newborns with hearing loss have a known genetic variant as a cause. The subcohort of CMV-positive newborns with symmetric mild-to-moderate bilateral hearing loss will have at least a 7% chance of having pathogenic gene variants associated with hearing loss. In a CMV-positive neonate who failed their newborn hearing screen bilaterally, genetic screening needs to be considered for accurate diagnosis and possible deferment of antiviral treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2714-2718, 2020.
Authors: A Eliot Shearer; Adam P DeLuca; Michael S Hildebrand; Kyle R Taylor; José Gurrola; Steve Scherer; Todd E Scheetz; Richard J H Smith Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David W Kimberlin; Penelope M Jester; Pablo J Sánchez; Amina Ahmed; Ravit Arav-Boger; Marian G Michaels; Negar Ashouri; Janet A Englund; Benjamin Estrada; Richard F Jacobs; José R Romero; Sunil K Sood; M Suzanne Whitworth; Mark J Abzug; Mary T Caserta; Sandra Fowler; Jorge Lujan-Zilbermann; Gregory A Storch; Roberta L DeBiasi; Jin-Young Han; April Palmer; Leonard B Weiner; Joseph A Bocchini; Penelope H Dennehy; Adam Finn; Paul D Griffiths; Suzanne Luck; Kathleen Gutierrez; Natasha Halasa; James Homans; Andi L Shane; Michael Sharland; Kari Simonsen; John A Vanchiere; Charles R Woods; Diane L Sabo; Inmaculada Aban; Huichien Kuo; Scott H James; Mark N Prichard; Jill Griffin; Dusty Giles; Edward P Acosta; Richard J Whitley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christina M Sloan-Heggen; Mojgan Babanejad; Maryam Beheshtian; Allen C Simpson; Kevin T Booth; Fariba Ardalani; Kathy L Frees; Marzieh Mohseni; Reza Mozafari; Zohreh Mehrjoo; Leila Jamali; Saeideh Vaziri; Tara Akhtarkhavari; Niloofar Bazazzadegan; Nooshin Nikzat; Sanaz Arzhangi; Farahnaz Sabbagh; Hasan Otukesh; Seyed Morteza Seifati; Hossein Khodaei; Maryam Taghdiri; Nicole C Meyer; Ahmad Daneshi; Mohammad Farhadi; Kimia Kahrizi; Richard J H Smith; Hela Azaiez; Hossein Najmabadi Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Hans-Henrik M Dahl; Teresa Y C Ching; Wendy Hutchison; Sanna Hou; Mark Seeto; Jessica Sjahalam-King Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 3.240