Philip Jonsson1,2, Tejus A Bale3, Andrew L Lin4, Marc Rosenblum3, Ingo K Mellinghoff4,1, Viviane S Tabar5, Shahiba Ogilvie5, Lauren Schaff4, Tzu-I Jonathan Yang6, Robert J Young7, Barry S Taylor1,2,8. 1. Department of Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065. 3. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065. 4. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065. 7. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065. 8. Department of Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the molecular era, the relevance of tumor grade for prognostication of IDH1/2-wildtype (WT) gliomas has been debated. It has been suggested that histologic grade II and III astrocytomas with molecular features of glioblastoma, IDH1/2-WT have a similar prognosis to glioblastoma and should be considered for the same clinical trials. METHODS: We integrated prospective clinical sequencing from 564 patients with IDH1/2-WT gliomas (26 grade II, 71 grade III and 467 grade IV) with clinical and radiographic data to assess associations between molecular features, grade and outcome. RESULTS: Compared to histologic grade IV IDH1/2-WT astrocytomas, histologic grade II astrocytomas harbor fewer chromosome 7/10 alterations (P = 0.04), EGFR amplifications (P = 0.022) and alterations in cell-cycle effectors (P = 1.9e-11), but a similar frequency of TERT promoter mutations. In contrast, there is no difference in the frequency of these canonical molecular features in histologic grade III vs. IV IDH1/2-WT disease. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for histologic grade II tumors were significantly longer than grade III tumors (P = 0.02 and P = 0.008, respectively), whereas there was no difference in PFS and OS for histologic grade III compared to grade IV tumors. Median PFS for histologic grade II, III and IV tumors was 19, 11 and 9 months, respectively. Median OS for the same tumors was 44, 23 and 23 months, respectively. In histologic grade II and III IDH1/2 WT tumors, gliomatosis is associated with the absence of cell-cycle alterations (P = 0.008) and enriched in grade II features (P = 0.1) and alterations in the PI3K-AKT pathway (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Grade II histology has genotypic and phenotypic associations with prognostic implications in IDH1/2-WT astrocytomas.
BACKGROUND: In the molecular era, the relevance of tumor grade for prognostication of IDH1/2-wildtype (WT) gliomas has been debated. It has been suggested that histologic grade II and III astrocytomas with molecular features of glioblastoma, IDH1/2-WT have a similar prognosis to glioblastoma and should be considered for the same clinical trials. METHODS: We integrated prospective clinical sequencing from 564 patients with IDH1/2-WTgliomas (26 grade II, 71 grade III and 467 grade IV) with clinical and radiographic data to assess associations between molecular features, grade and outcome. RESULTS: Compared to histologic grade IV IDH1/2-WTastrocytomas, histologic grade II astrocytomas harbor fewer chromosome 7/10 alterations (P = 0.04), EGFR amplifications (P = 0.022) and alterations in cell-cycle effectors (P = 1.9e-11), but a similar frequency of TERT promoter mutations. In contrast, there is no difference in the frequency of these canonical molecular features in histologic grade III vs. IV IDH1/2-WT disease. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for histologic grade II tumors were significantly longer than grade III tumors (P = 0.02 and P = 0.008, respectively), whereas there was no difference in PFS and OS for histologic grade III compared to grade IV tumors. Median PFS for histologic grade II, III and IV tumors was 19, 11 and 9 months, respectively. Median OS for the same tumors was 44, 23 and 23 months, respectively. In histologic grade II and III IDH1/2 WT tumors, gliomatosis is associated with the absence of cell-cycle alterations (P = 0.008) and enriched in grade II features (P = 0.1) and alterations in the PI3K-AKT pathway (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Grade II histology has genotypic and phenotypic associations with prognostic implications in IDH1/2-WTastrocytomas.
Authors: Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin Journal: Cell Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Maarten M J Wijnenga; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Pim J French; Nathalie E Synhaeve; Winand N M Dinjens; Peggy N Atmodimedjo; Johan M Kros; Clemens M F Dirven; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Martin J van den Bent Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Verena Körber; Jing Yang; Pankaj Barah; Yonghe Wu; Damian Stichel; Zuguang Gu; Michael Nai Chung Fletcher; David Jones; Bettina Hentschel; Katrin Lamszus; Jörg Christian Tonn; Gabriele Schackert; Michael Sabel; Jörg Felsberg; Angela Zacher; Kerstin Kaulich; Daniel Hübschmann; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Matthias Schlesner; Guido Reifenberger; Thomas Höfer; Peter Lichter Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Daniel H Lachance; Annette M Molinaro; Kyle M Walsh; Paul A Decker; Hugues Sicotte; Melike Pekmezci; Terri Rice; Matt L Kosel; Ivan V Smirnov; Gobinda Sarkar; Alissa A Caron; Thomas M Kollmeyer; Corinne E Praska; Anisha R Chada; Chandralekha Halder; Helen M Hansen; Lucie S McCoy; Paige M Bracci; Roxanne Marshall; Shichun Zheng; Gerald F Reis; Alexander R Pico; Brian P O'Neill; Jan C Buckner; Caterina Giannini; Jason T Huse; Arie Perry; Tarik Tihan; Mitchell S Berger; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados; Joseph Wiemels; John K Wiencke; Margaret R Wrensch; Robert B Jenkins Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Ahmet Zehir; Ryma Benayed; Ronak H Shah; Aijazuddin Syed; Sumit Middha; Hyunjae R Kim; Preethi Srinivasan; Jianjiong Gao; Debyani Chakravarty; Sean M Devlin; Matthew D Hellmann; David A Barron; Alison M Schram; Meera Hameed; Snjezana Dogan; Dara S Ross; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Deborah F DeLair; JinJuan Yao; Diana L Mandelker; Donavan T Cheng; Raghu Chandramohan; Abhinita S Mohanty; Ryan N Ptashkin; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Meera Prasad; Mustafa H Syed; Anoop Balakrishnan Rema; Zhen Y Liu; Khedoudja Nafa; Laetitia Borsu; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Ruben Bacares; Iwona J Kiecka; Anna Razumova; Julie B Son; Lisa Stewart; Tessara Baldi; Kerry A Mullaney; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Efsevia Vakiani; Adam A Abeshouse; Alexander V Penson; Philip Jonsson; Niedzica Camacho; Matthew T Chang; Helen H Won; Benjamin E Gross; Ritika Kundra; Zachary J Heins; Hsiao-Wei Chen; Sarah Phillips; Hongxin Zhang; Jiaojiao Wang; Angelica Ochoa; Jonathan Wills; Michael Eubank; Stacy B Thomas; Stuart M Gardos; Dalicia N Reales; Jesse Galle; Robert Durany; Roy Cambria; Wassim Abida; Andrea Cercek; Darren R Feldman; Mrinal M Gounder; A Ari Hakimi; James J Harding; Gopa Iyer; Yelena Y Janjigian; Emmet J Jordan; Ciara M Kelly; Maeve A Lowery; Luc G T Morris; Antonio M Omuro; Nitya Raj; Pedram Razavi; Alexander N Shoushtari; Neerav Shukla; Tara E Soumerai; Anna M Varghese; Rona Yaeger; Jonathan Coleman; Bernard Bochner; Gregory J Riely; Leonard B Saltz; Howard I Scher; Paul J Sabbatini; Mark E Robson; David S Klimstra; Barry S Taylor; Jose Baselga; Nikolaus Schultz; David M Hyman; Maria E Arcila; David B Solit; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger Journal: Nat Med Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jianfang Liu; Tara Lichtenberg; Katherine A Hoadley; Laila M Poisson; Alexander J Lazar; Andrew D Cherniack; Albert J Kovatich; Christopher C Benz; Douglas A Levine; Adrian V Lee; Larsson Omberg; Denise M Wolf; Craig D Shriver; Vesteinn Thorsson; Hai Hu Journal: Cell Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Matthew T Chang; Saurabh Asthana; Sizhi Paul Gao; Byron H Lee; Jocelyn S Chapman; Cyriac Kandoth; JianJiong Gao; Nicholas D Socci; David B Solit; Adam B Olshen; Nikolaus Schultz; Barry S Taylor Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Daniel J Brat; Kenneth Aldape; Julia A Bridge; Peter Canoll; Howard Colman; Meera R Hameed; Brent T Harris; Eyas M Hattab; Jason T Huse; Robert B Jenkins; Dolores H Lopez-Terrada; William C McDonald; Fausto J Rodriguez; Lesley H Souter; Carol Colasacco; Nicole E Thomas; Michelle Hawks Yount; Martin J van den Bent; Arie Perry Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 5.686