Literature DB >> 31984232

Women in the European Stroke Organisation: One, two, many… - A Top Down and Bottom Up approach.

Else Charlotte Sandset1, Diana Aguiar de Sousa2, Hanne Christensen3, Charlotte Cordonnier4, Urs Fischer5, Mira Katan6, Christine Kremer7, Aleksandra Pavlovic8, Nikola Sprigg9, H Bart van der Worp10, Marialuisa Zedde11, Valeria Caso12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing proportion of physicians are women, yet they still face challenges with career advancement. In 2014, the European Stroke Organisation established the goal of increasing the number and participation of women within the society using a Top Down and Bottom Up approach. The 'Women's Initiative for Stroke in Europe' was created the same year by a group of women active within the organisation. We aimed to assess the current status of women in European Stroke Organisation, and to explore the change in sex differences after the introduction of focused approaches to address disparities in 2014.
METHODS: Using organisational records, we collected data on sex differences in core activities from 2008 up to 2017 including membership, participation in conferences, courses and in the official journal of the society, and positions of seniority and leadership. We estimated sex distribution differences in each of the activities from 2014 to date.
RESULTS: In 2017, the proportion of female members was 40%, while 24% of fellows, 22% of the executive board and 19% of the editorial board in the official journal of the society were women. From 2014 to 2017, there was a significant increase in the proportion of female members (p = 0.0002) and in women participating in the annual conference as faculty (p = 0.001). There was no significant change in the sex distribution among the faculty members in junior educational activities (≤27%) or fellows.
INTERPRETATION: In 2017, the proportion of women holding positions of seniority and leadership is still significantly lower to the proportion of women attending educational activities. Transparent data on sex distribution will assist implementing tailored programmes to achieve progress against sex-based barriers. © European Stroke Organisation 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; acute medicine; gender bias

Year:  2019        PMID: 31984232      PMCID: PMC6960690          DOI: 10.1177/2396987319841979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Stroke J        ISSN: 2396-9873


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of Male vs Female Resident Milestone Evaluations by Faculty During Emergency Medicine Residency Training.

Authors:  Arjun Dayal; Daniel M O'Connor; Usama Qadri; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 2.  Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence.

Authors:  Laurel D Edmunds; Pavel V Ovseiko; Sasha Shepperd; Trisha Greenhalgh; Peggy Frith; Nia W Roberts; Linda H Pololi; Alastair M Buchan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Future of subspecialty training in vascular neurology.

Authors:  Harold P Adams; José Biller
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Women in Cardiology: The British Junior Cardiologists' Association identifies challenges.

Authors:  Hannah C Sinclair; Abhishek Joshi; Chris Allen; Jubin Joseph; S M Afzal Sohaib; Alison Calver; Russell Smith
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  How stereotypes impair women's careers in science.

Authors:  Ernesto Reuben; Paola Sapienza; Luigi Zingales
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Patricia G Devine; Linda Baier Manwell; Angela Byars-Winston; Eve Fine; Cecilia E Ford; Patrick Forscher; Carol Isaac; Anna Kaatz; Wairimu Magua; Mari Palta; Jennifer Sheridan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Inadequate progress for women in academic medicine: findings from the National Faculty Study.

Authors:  Phyllis L Carr; Christine M Gunn; Samantha A Kaplan; Anita Raj; Karen M Freund
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.

Authors:  Corinne A Moss-Racusin; John F Dovidio; Victoria L Brescoll; Mark J Graham; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Professional fulfillment and parenting work-life balance in female physicians in Basic Sciences and medical research: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of all 80 medical schools in Japan.

Authors:  Yuka Yamazaki; Takanori Uka; Eiji Marui
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-09-15

10.  Medicine Goes Female: Protocol for Improving Career Options of Females and Working Conditions for Researching Physicians in Clinical Medical Research by Organizational Transformation and Participatory Design.

Authors:  Joachim Hasebrook; Klaus Hahnenkamp; Wolfgang F F A Buhre; Dianne de Korte-de Boer; Ankie E W Hamaekers; Bibiana Metelmann; Camila Metelmann; Marina Bortul; Silvia Palmisano; Jannicke Mellin-Olsen; Andrius Macas; Janusz Andres; Anna Prokop-Dorner; Tomáš Vymazal; Juergen Hinkelmann; Sibyll Rodde; Bettina Pfleiderer
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-08-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Female insertion in neurosurgery: Evolution of a stigma break.

Authors:  Luiz Severo Bem Junior; Nilson Batista Lemos; Júlia de Araújo Vianna; Juliana Garcia Silva; Luana Moury Fernandes Sanchez; Ana Cristina Veiga Silva; Hildo Rocha Cirne de Azevedo
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-03-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.