Literature DB >> 31983005

The shale gas production and economic growth in local economies across the US.

Faik Bilgili1, Emrah Koçak2, Ümit Bulut3.   

Abstract

Recently, several seminal works have been drawing attention to the revolution of shale gas production technology of the USA, the impact of shale gas on energy sectors, as well as the influences of shale gas on macroeconomic variables of employment, economic growth, etc. Nevertheless, one may claim that two gaps appear in literature. The first gap is the absence of an econometric study estimating the effect of shale oil/gas on national economies. The more considerable second gap is the absence of econometric analyses revealing the impulses of shale gas on local economies. Therefore, this paper observes the possible causalities between the shale gas and local gross domestic product (GDP) employing quarterly data covering the period 2007-2016 for 12 states in the US. After performing the tests of cross-sectional dependence, heterogeneity, stationarity, and cointegration, the paper conducts the panel Granger causality analyses. The empirical findings depict that (i) there is available unidirectional relationship from local shale gas production to local GDP in Colorado, Ohio, and West Virginia; (ii) there occurs an impulse from GDP to local shale gas production for Louisiana, North Dakota, and Oklahoma; (iii) a bidirectional causality coexists between local shale gas production and GDP in Arkansas, California, and Texas; and (iv) there exists no association between local GDP and local shale gas extraction in Montana, New Mexico, and Wyoming.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-sectional dependence; Energy-growth nexus; Heterogeneity; Local energy policies; Shale gas; The US economy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31983005     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07776-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  5 in total

1.  Economic growth and energy consumption in Brazil: cointegration and causality analysis.

Authors:  Marco Mele
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The impact of hydropower energy consumption on economic growth and CO2 emissions in China.

Authors:  Mallesh Ummalla; Asharani Samal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Socio-economics: assess benefits and costs of shale energy.

Authors:  Thomas G Measham; David A Fleming
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA.

Authors:  Eyup Dogan; Berna Turkekul
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Simple Rules for Climate Policy and Integrated Assessment.

Authors:  Frederick van der Ploeg; Armon Rezai
Journal:  Environ Resour Econ (Dordr)       Date:  2018-08-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.