Literature DB >> 31982952

Variation in mycorrhizal growth response influences competitive interactions and mechanisms of plant species coexistence.

Mara B McHaffie1, Hafiz Maherali2.   

Abstract

Plant species vary in their growth response to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, with responses ranging from negative to positive. Differences in response to AM fungi may affect competition between plant species, influencing their ability to coexist. We hypothesized that positively responding species, whose growth is stimulated by AM fungi, will experience stronger intraspecific competition and weaker interspecific competition in soil containing AM fungi, while neutrally or negatively responding species should experience weaker intraspecific and stronger interspecific competition. We grew Plantago lanceolata, which responds positively to AM fungi, and Bromus inermis, which responds negatively to AM fungi, in an additive response surface competition experiment that varied the total density and relative frequency of each species. Plants were grown in sterilized background soil that had been inoculated with whole soil biota, which includes AM fungi, or a microbial wash, that contained other soil microbes but no AM fungi, or in sterilized soil that contained no biota. The positively responding P. lanceolata was more strongly limited by intraspecific than interspecific competition when AM fungi were present. By contrast, the presence of AM fungi decreased the strength of intraspecific competition experienced by the negatively responding B. inermis. Because AM fungi are almost always present in soil, strong intraspecific competition in positively responding species would prevent them from outcompeting species that respond neutrally or negatively to AM fungi. The potential for increased intraspecific competition to offset growth benefits of AM fungi could, therefore, be a stabilizing mechanism that promotes coexistence among plant species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AM fungi; Bromus inermis; Plantago lanceolata; Response surface; Self-limitation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31982952     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04609-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities.

Authors:  John N Klironomos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Coexistence of perennial plants: an embarrassment of niches.

Authors:  Peter B Adler; Stephen P Ellner; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  Microbial population and community dynamics on plant roots and their feedbacks on plant communities.

Authors:  James D Bever; Thomas G Platt; Elise R Morton
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming; Sue Finch
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005 Feb-Mar

Review 5.  Plant responsiveness to mycorrhizas differs from dependence upon mycorrhizas.

Authors:  David P Janos
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.387

6.  A niche for neutrality.

Authors:  Peter B Adler; Janneke Hillerislambers; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity.

Authors:  Jonathan M Levine; Janneke HilleRisLambers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Phosphorus limitation, soil-borne pathogens and the coexistence of plant species in hyperdiverse forests and shrublands.

Authors:  Etienne Laliberté; Hans Lambers; Treena I Burgess; S Joseph Wright
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 10.151

9.  Plant-mycorrhizal interactions mediate plant community coexistence by altering resource demand.

Authors:  Jiang Jiang; Jessica A M Moore; Anupam Priyadarshi; Aimée T Classen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 10.  Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions.

Authors:  James D Bever; Ian A Dickie; Evelina Facelli; Jose M Facelli; John Klironomos; Mari Moora; Matthias C Rillig; William D Stock; Mark Tibbett; Martin Zobel
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of plant-soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences.

Authors:  Akihiro Koyama; Teresa Dias; Pedro M Antunes
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 6.105

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.