Literature DB >> 31982648

Integrating machine-generated mortality estimates and behavioral nudges to promote serious illness conversations for cancer patients: Design and methods for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

Christopher R Manz1, Ravi B Parikh2, Chalanda N Evans3, Corey Chivers4, Susan H Regli4, Justin E Bekelman5, Dylan Small3, Charles A L Rareshide3, Nina O'Connor3, Lynn M Schuchter6, Lawrence N Shulman6, Mitesh S Patel2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer often receive care that is not aligned with their personal values and goals. Serious illness conversations (SICs) between clinicians and patients can help increase a patient's understanding of their prognosis, goals and values. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study, we describe the design of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the impact of an intervention that employs machine learning-based prognostic algorithms and behavioral nudges to prompt oncologists to have SICs with patients at high risk of short-term mortality. Data are collected on documented SICs, documented advance care planning discussions, and end-of-life care utilization (emergency room and inpatient admissions, chemotherapy and hospice utilization) for patients of all enrolled clinicians.
CONCLUSION: This trial represents a novel application of machine-generated mortality predictions combined with behavioral nudges in the routine care of outpatients with cancer. Findings from the trial may inform strategies to encourage early serious illness conversations and the application of mortality risk predictions in clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03984773.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance care planning; Behavioral nudges; End of life care; Machine learning; Mortality predictions; Serious illness conversations

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31982648      PMCID: PMC7910008          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  32 in total

1.  Integrating Predictive Analytics Into High-Value Care: The Dawn of Precision Delivery.

Authors:  Ravi B Parikh; Meetali Kakad; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index: five- and ten-year data for all-cause survival within a screened population.

Authors:  Y Fong; J Evans; D Brook; J Kenkre; P Jarvis; K Gower-Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg; Judith A C Rietjens; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 4.  Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Oncology: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Christine M Bestvina; Blase N Polite
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  N A Christakis; E B Lamont
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-19

6.  Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care.

Authors:  Josephine M Clayton; Phyllis N Butow; Martin H N Tattersall; Rhonda J Devine; Judy M Simpson; Ghauri Aggarwal; Katherine J Clark; David C Currow; Louise M Elliott; Judith Lacey; Philip G Lee; Michael A Noel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction Model for Targeted Palliative Care Among Hospitalized Medical Patients: a Pilot Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Katherine R Courtright; Corey Chivers; Michael Becker; Susan H Regli; Linnea C Pepper; Michael E Draugelis; Nina R O'Connor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Bridget A Neville; Mary Beth Landrum; John Z Ayanian; Susan D Block; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Lung cancer prognostic index: a risk score to predict overall survival after the diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Marliese Alexander; Rory Wolfe; David Ball; Matthew Conron; Robert G Stirling; Benjamin Solomon; Michael MacManus; Ann Officer; Sameer Karnam; Kate Burbury; Sue M Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Machine Learning Approaches to Predict 6-Month Mortality Among Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Ravi B Parikh; Christopher Manz; Corey Chivers; Susan Harkness Regli; Jennifer Braun; Michael E Draugelis; Lynn M Schuchter; Lawrence N Shulman; Amol S Navathe; Mitesh S Patel; Nina R O'Connor
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-10-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Behavioral Nudges on the Quality of Serious Illness Conversations Among Patients With Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Eric H Li; William Ferrell; Tamar Klaiman; Pallavi Kumar; Nina O'Connor; Lynn M Schuchter; Jinbo Chen; Mitesh S Patel; Christopher R Manz; Ravi B Parikh
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-11-12

Review 2.  Patient Identification for Serious Illness Conversations: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Rebecca Baxter; Erik K Fromme; Anna Sandgren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.