Literature DB >> 31982250

A cost-effectiveness analysis after implementation of a fast-track protocol for total knee arthroplasty.

Joris A Jansen1, Jeroen Kruidenier2, Bea Spek3, Barbara A M Snoeker4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of arthroplasty fast-track protocols, many studies have investigated their effect on complications and length of hospital stay. However, few fast-track studies have examined the long-term effects on cost and health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to specifically analyze, after implementation of fast-track TKA, cost-effectiveness with functional outcome, length of stay, thromboembolic complications, medical costs, and quality of life after 12 months.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 403 TKA patients treated by a fast-track pathway were compared with 283 patients in a non-fast-track pathway. Length of stay and thromboembolic complications were registered postoperatively. Healthcare costs were based on hospital production costs and calculated on average. Costs were compared with EQ-5D questionnaires to derived quality-adjusted life year (QALY) scores.
RESULTS: No between-protocol differences were found in functional outcome and quality of life after TKA. The fast-track protocol reduced the length of stay from a median five days to median three days, and did not influence the thromboembolic complication rate (2.6%). After one-year follow-up for fast-track pathway patients, QALY was 0.85 vs. 0.84 for non-fast-track. A reduction of 268,- euro per patient was calculated in favor of the fast-track protocol.
CONCLUSION: Fast-track protocol implementation is a cost-effective strategy for patients undergoing TKA, with high QALY and reduced costs. Fast-track TKA treatment is safe, with low thromboembolic complications. This is the first study to measure fast-track implementation effects on functional outcome and quality of life up to 12 months postoperatively, and calculate equivalent QALYs for both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness study; Enhanced recovery; Fast-track pathway; Quality-adjusted life years; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 31982250     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  3 in total

Review 1.  Outcome measures in total hip arthroplasty: have our metrics changed over 15 years?

Authors:  Roy H Lan; Jack W Bell; Linsen T Samuel; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 2.  Returning to orthopaedic business as usual after COVID-19: strategies and options.

Authors:  Francesca de Caro; Thomas Michael Hirschmann; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Key Components, Current Practice and Clinical Outcomes of ERAS Programs in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesca Salamanna; Deyanira Contartese; Silvia Brogini; Andrea Visani; Konstantinos Martikos; Cristiana Griffoni; Alessandro Ricci; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Milena Fini
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.