Literature DB >> 31981604

Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Muaaz M Alkhouli1, Salma F Al Nesser1, Nada G Bshara1, Awab N AlMidani1, John C Comisi2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study compared and evaluated the effectiveness of Brix 3000 and 2.25 % sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) gel with conventional rotary instrumentation method in caries excavation of primary molars. The null hypothesis: no difference between the two tested chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents used in this trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted with 32 children suffering from proximal caries of primary maxillary molars, age ranging between 6 and 9 years old. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups: Brix 3000, NaOCl gel, and conventional with 10, 12, and 10 teeth in each group, respectively. After isolation of selected teeth, either CMCR agent were applied for two minutes. The application was repeated as needed until a caries-free surface was obtained. The conventional group used low-speed burs to excavate all carious lesions. The time required to obtain a caries-free result for each testing method was recorded. Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale was used to assess the acceptance of the technique used by the child.
RESULTS: Conventional treatment required significantly less time for caries removal compared to Brix 3000 (P = .002) and NaOCl gel (P = .000). No significant difference observed between Brix 3000 and NaOCl gel (P = .679). Statistically higher pain scores were observed with conventional treatment compared to both Brix 3000 (P = .000) and NaOCl gel (P = .005). Pain scores were lower with Brix 3000, and NaOCl gel with no significant difference observed between the CMCR agents (p = .690).
CONCLUSIONS: CMCR agents that are effective in removing the carious dentine of primary teeth without negatively affecting the cooperation of children. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of a 2.25 % sodium hypochlorite gel can be an effective and well-tolerated method of removing decay from primary teeth and reduce the trauma associated with conventional rotary caries removal.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caries; Caries removal; Chemo-mechanical caries removal; Minimally invasive dentistry; Sodium hypochlorite gel

Year:  2020        PMID: 31981604     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Bibliometric Analysis (2010-2020) of the Dental Scientific Literature on Chemo-Mechanical Methods of Caries Removal Using Carisolv and BRIX3000.

Authors:  Dana Cristina Bratu; Nicoleta Nikolajevic-Stoican; George Popa; Silvia Izabella Pop; Bianca Dragoș; Magda-Mihaela Luca
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.948

2.  Worldwide research trends on the use of chemical-mechanical caries removal products over the years: a critical review.

Authors:  T F Souza; M L Martins; M B Magno; J M Vicente-Gomila; A Fonseca-Gonçalves; L C Maia
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2022-07-13

3.  Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Mahenaz Salam Inamdar; Dayanand G Chole; Shrinivas S Bakle; Neha P Gandhi; Nikhil R Hatte; Mahesh P Rao
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-11-05

4.  Treatment time, pain experience and acceptability of the technique for caries removal in primary teeth using the ART approach with or without Brix3000™ papain gel: a preliminary randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  T F de Souza; M L Martins; C M Tavares-Silva; A Fonseca-Gonçalves; L C Maia
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2021-10-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.