Wietse A Tol1, Marx R Leku2, Daniel P Lakin3, Kenneth Carswell4, Jura Augustinavicius3, Alex Adaku5, Teresa M Au4, Felicity L Brown6, Richard A Bryant7, Claudia Garcia-Moreno8, Rashelle J Musci3, Peter Ventevogel9, Ross G White10, Mark van Ommeren4. 1. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Peter C Alderman Program for Global Mental Health, HealthRight International, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: wtol@jhu.edu. 2. Arua, Uganda. 3. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. 5. Arua, Uganda; Department of Psychiatry, Arua Regional Referral Hospital, Arua, Uganda. 6. WarChild Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 7. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 8. Department of Reproductive Health & Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. 9. Public Health Section, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland. 10. Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Innovative solutions are required to provide mental health support at scale in low-resource humanitarian contexts. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a facilitator-guided, group-based, self-help intervention (Self-Help Plus) to reduce psychological distress in female refugees. METHODS: We did a cluster randomised trial in rural refugee settlements in northern Uganda. Participants were female South Sudanese refugees with at least moderate levels of psychological distress (cutoff ≥5 on the Kessler 6). The intervention comprised access to usual care and five 2-h audio-recorded stress-management workshops (20-30 refugees) led by briefly trained lay facilitators, accompanied by an illustrated self-help book. Villages were randomly assigned to either intervention (Self-Help Plus or enhanced usual care) on a 1:1 basis. Within 14 villages, randomly selected households were approached. Screening of women in households continued until 20-30 eligible participants were identified per site. The primary outcome was individual psychological distress, assessed using the Kessler 6 symptom checklist 1 week before, 1 week after, and 3 months after intervention, in the intention-to-treat population. All outcomes were measured at the individual (rather than cluster) level. Secondary outcomes included personally identified problems, post-traumatic stress, depression symptoms, feelings of anger, social interactions with other ethnic groups, functional impairment, and subjective wellbeing. Assessors were masked to allocation. This trial was prospectively registered at ISRCTN, number 50148022. FINDINGS: Of 694 eligible participants (331 Self-Help Plus, 363 enhanced usual care), 613 (88%) completed all assessments. Compared with controls, we found stronger improvements for Self-Help Plus on psychological distress 3 months post intervention (β -1·20, 95% CI -2·33 to -0·08; p=0·04; d -0·26). We also found larger improvements for Self-Help Plus 3 months post-intervention for five of eight secondary outcomes (effect size range -0·30 to -0·36). Refugees with different trauma exposure, length of time in settlements, and initial psychological distress benefited similarly. With regard to safety considerations, the independent data safety management board responded to six adverse events, and none were evaluated to be concerns in response to the intervention. INTERPRETATION:Self-Help Plus is an innovative, facilitator-guided, group-based self-helpintervention that can be rapidly deployed to large numbers of participants, and resulted in meaningful reductions in psychological distress at 3 months among South Sudanese female refugees. FUNDING: Research for Health in Humanitarian Crises (R2HC) Programme.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Innovative solutions are required to provide mental health support at scale in low-resource humanitarian contexts. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a facilitator-guided, group-based, self-help intervention (Self-Help Plus) to reduce psychological distress in female refugees. METHODS: We did a cluster randomised trial in rural refugee settlements in northern Uganda. Participants were female South Sudanese refugees with at least moderate levels of psychological distress (cutoff ≥5 on the Kessler 6). The intervention comprised access to usual care and five 2-h audio-recorded stress-management workshops (20-30 refugees) led by briefly trained lay facilitators, accompanied by an illustrated self-help book. Villages were randomly assigned to either intervention (Self-Help Plus or enhanced usual care) on a 1:1 basis. Within 14 villages, randomly selected households were approached. Screening of women in households continued until 20-30 eligible participants were identified per site. The primary outcome was individual psychological distress, assessed using the Kessler 6 symptom checklist 1 week before, 1 week after, and 3 months after intervention, in the intention-to-treat population. All outcomes were measured at the individual (rather than cluster) level. Secondary outcomes included personally identified problems, post-traumatic stress, depression symptoms, feelings of anger, social interactions with other ethnic groups, functional impairment, and subjective wellbeing. Assessors were masked to allocation. This trial was prospectively registered at ISRCTN, number 50148022. FINDINGS: Of 694 eligible participants (331 Self-Help Plus, 363 enhanced usual care), 613 (88%) completed all assessments. Compared with controls, we found stronger improvements for Self-Help Plus on psychological distress 3 months post intervention (β -1·20, 95% CI -2·33 to -0·08; p=0·04; d -0·26). We also found larger improvements for Self-Help Plus 3 months post-intervention for five of eight secondary outcomes (effect size range -0·30 to -0·36). Refugees with different trauma exposure, length of time in settlements, and initial psychological distress benefited similarly. With regard to safety considerations, the independent data safety management board responded to six adverse events, and none were evaluated to be concerns in response to the intervention. INTERPRETATION: Self-Help Plus is an innovative, facilitator-guided, group-based self-help intervention that can be rapidly deployed to large numbers of participants, and resulted in meaningful reductions in psychological distress at 3 months among South Sudanese female refugees. FUNDING: Research for Health in Humanitarian Crises (R2HC) Programme.
Authors: Joep van Agteren; Matthew Iasiello; Laura Lo; Jonathan Bartholomaeus; Zoe Kopsaftis; Marissa Carey; Michael Kyrios Journal: Nat Hum Behav Date: 2021-04-19
Authors: Kerem Böge; Carine Karnouk; Andreas Hoell; Mira Tschorn; Inge Kamp-Becker; Frank Padberg; Aline Übleis; Alkomiet Hasan; Peter Falkai; Hans-Joachim Salize; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Tobias Banaschewski; Frank Schneider; Ute Habel; Paul Plener; Eric Hahn; Maren Wiechers; Michael Strupf; Andrea Jobst; Sabina Millenet; Edgar Hoehne; Thorsten Sukale; Raphael Dinauer; Martin Schuster; Nassim Mehran; Franziska Kaiser; Stefanie Bröcheler; Klaus Lieb; Andreas Heinz; Michael Rapp; Malek Bajbouj Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2022-06-06
Authors: Flora Cohen; Sabrina Hermosilla; Justin Knox; Gary Samuel Agaba; Grace Obalim; Rehema Kajungu; Patrick Onyango Mangen; Lindsay Stark Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Eirini Karyotaki; Marit Sijbrandij; Marianna Purgato; Ceren Acarturk; Daniel Lakin; Della Bailey; Emily Peckham; Ersin Uygun; Federico Tedeschi; Johannes Wancata; Jura Augustinavicius; Ken Carswell; Maritta Välimäki; Mark van Ommeren; Markus Koesters; Mariana Popa; Marx Ronald Leku; Minna Anttila; Rachel Churchill; Ross White; Sarah Al-Hashimi; Tella Lantta; Teresa Au; Thomas Klein; Wietse A Tol; Pim Cuijpers; Corrado Barbui Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol Date: 2021-07-05