Literature DB >> 31981518

Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study.

Dexin Gong1, Lianlian Wu1, Jun Zhang1, Ganggang Mu1, Lei Shen1, Jun Liu2, Zhengqiang Wang1, Wei Zhou1, Ping An1, Xu Huang1, Xiaoda Jiang1, Yanxia Li1, Xinyue Wan1, Shan Hu3, Yiyun Chen3, Xiao Hu3, Youming Xu1, Xiaoyun Zhu4, Suqin Li4, Liwen Yao1, Xinqi He1, Di Chen1, Li Huang1, Xiao Wei4, Xuemei Wang4, Honggang Yu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy performance varies among endoscopists, impairing the discovery of colorectal cancers and precursor lesions. We aimed to construct a real-time quality improvement system (ENDOANGEL) to monitor real-time withdrawal speed and colonoscopy withdrawal time and to remind endoscopists of blind spots caused by endoscope slipping. We also aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this system for improving adenoma yield of everyday colonoscopy.
METHODS: The ENDOANGEL system was developed using deep neural networks and perceptual hash algorithms. We recruited consecutive patients aged 18-75 years from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University in China who provided written informed consent. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) using computer-generated random numbers and block randomisation (block size of four) to either colonoscopy with the ENDOANGEL system or unassisted colonoscopy (control). Endoscopists were not masked to the random assignment but analysts and patients were unaware of random assignments. The primary endpoint was the adenoma detection rate (ADR), which is the proportion of patients having one or more adenomas detected at colonoscopy. The primary analysis was done per protocol (ie, in all patients having colonoscopy done in accordance with the assigned intervention) and by intention to treat (ie, in all randomised patients). This trial is registered with http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900021984.
FINDINGS: Between June 18, 2019, and Sept 6, 2019, 704 patients were randomly allocated colonoscopy with the ENDOANGEL system (n=355) or unassisted (control) colonoscopy (n=349). In the intention-to-treat population, ADR was significantly greater in the ENDOANGEL group than in the control group, with 58 (16%) of 355 patients allocated ENDOANGEL-assisted colonoscopy having one or more adenomas detected, compared with 27 (8%) of 349 allocated control colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 2·30, 95% CI 1·40-3·77; p=0·0010). In the per-protocol analysis, findings were similar, with 54 (17%) of 324 patients assigned ENDOANGEL-assisted colonoscopy and 26 (8%) of 318 patients assigned control colonoscopy having one or more adenomas detected (OR 2·18, 95% CI 1·31-3·62; p=0·0026). No adverse events were reported.
INTERPRETATION: The ENDOANGEL system significantly improved the adenoma yield during colonoscopy and seems to be effective and safe for use during routine colonoscopy. FUNDING: Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Hubei Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31981518     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30413-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


  49 in total

1.  Welcoming new guidelines for AI clinical research.

Authors:  Eric J Topol
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  UEG Week 2020 Poster Presentations.

Authors: 
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Alexander Meining
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 4.  Current status and limitations of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Joel Troya; Daniel Fitting
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 5.  Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Liu; Samantha Cruz Rivera; David Moher; Melanie J Calvert; Alastair K Denniston
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence in Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: The Current Status and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Paola Cesaro; Leonardo Minelli Grazioli; Nicola Olivari; Cristiano Spada
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Yutaka Okagawa; Seiichiro Abe; Masayoshi Yamada; Ichiro Oda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  A Gratifying Step forward for the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Endoscopy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yixin Xu; Yulin Tan; Yibo Wang; Jie Gao; Dapeng Wu; Xuezhong Xu
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  A Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Control System Incorporated With Deep Learning Improved Endoscopist Performance in a Pretest and Post-Test Trial.

Authors:  Liwen Yao; Jun Liu; Lianlian Wu; Lihui Zhang; Xiao Hu; Jinzhu Liu; Zihua Lu; Dexin Gong; Ping An; Jun Zhang; Guiying Hu; Di Chen; Renquan Luo; Shan Hu; Yanning Yang; Honggang Yu
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 10.  Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension.

Authors:  Samantha Cruz Rivera; Xiaoxuan Liu; An-Wen Chan; Alastair K Denniston; Melanie J Calvert
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.