Literature DB >> 31981377

Outcome of fetal echogenic bowel: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alice D'Amico1, Danilo Buca1, Giuseppe Rizzo2,3, Asma Khalil4,5, Claudia Silvi1, Alexander Makatsariya3, Luigi Nappi6,7, Marco Liberati1, Francesco D'Antonio6,7.   

Abstract

The main aim of this systematic review was to explore the outcome of fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel (EB) on antenatal ultrasound. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with isolated EB no associated major structural anomalies at the time of diagnosis. The outcomes observed were: chromosomal anomalies, cystic fibrosis (CF), associated structural anomalies detected only at follow-up scans and at birth, regression during pregnancy, congenital infections, intra-uterine (IUD), neonatal (NND) and perinatal (PND) death. Twenty-five studies (12 971 fetuses) were included. Chromosomal anomalies occurred in 3.3% of the fetuses, mainly Trisomy 21 and aneuploidies involving the sex chromosomes. Cystic fibrosis occurred in 2.2%. Congenital infections affected 2.2%, mainly congenital Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The majority of fetuses with EB experienced regression or disappearance of the EB at follow-up scans. Associated anomalies were detected at a follow-up scan in 1.8%. Associated anomalies were detected at birth and missed at ultrasound in 2.1% of cases. IUD occurred in 3.2% of cases while the corresponding figures for NND and PND were 0.4% and 3.1%. Fetuses with EB are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome, highlighting the need for a thorough antenatal management and postnatal follow-up. Assessment during pregnancy and after birth should be performed in order to look for signs of fetal aneuploidy, congenital infections and associated structural anomalies.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31981377     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  5 in total

1.  Prenatal Ultrasound Suspicion of Cystic Fibrosis in a Multiethnic Population: Is Extensive CFTR Genotyping Needed?

Authors:  Chadia Mekki; Abdel Aissat; Véronique Mirlesse; Sophie Mayer Lacrosniere; Elsa Eche; Annick Le Floch; Sandra Whalen; Cecile Prud'Homme; Christelle Remus; Benoit Funalot; Vanina Castaigne; Pascale Fanen; Alix de Becdelièvre
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Pathophysiology of Hyperechogenic Bowel in Congenitally Human Cytomegalovirus Infected Fetuses.

Authors:  Liliana Gabrielli; Maria P Bonasoni; Angela Chiereghin; Giulia Piccirilli; Eva C Borgatti; Giuliana Simonazzi; Nunzio C M Salfi; Ione Tamagnini; Tiziana Lazzarotto
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-22

3.  Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Based on Second-Trimester Ultrasonographic Soft Markers in Low-Risk Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Yunyun Liu; Xiaosha Jing; Lingling Xing; Sha Liu; Jianlong Liu; Jing Cheng; Cechuan Deng; Ting Bai; Tianyu Xia; Xiang Wei; Yuan Luo; Quanfang Zhou; Qian Zhu; Hongqian Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Clinical significance of soft markers in second trimester ultrasonography for pregnant Korean women: a multicenter study and literature review.

Authors:  Hyun Sun Ko; Dong Wook Kwak; Soo-Young Oh; Sae Kyung Choi; Joon Seok Hong; Han Sung Hwang; Hyun Soo Park; Hyun-Joo Seol; Moon Young Kim; Sa Jin Kim; Joong Shin Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  A Cross-Sectional Study of the Marital Attitudes of Pregnant Women at Risk for Cystic Fibrosis and Psychological Impact of Prenatal Screening.

Authors:  Zoran Laurentiu Popa; Madalin-Marius Margan; Izabella Petre; Elena Bernad; Lavinia Stelea; Veronica Daniela Chiriac; Marius Craina; Ioana Mihaela Ciuca; Anca Mihaela Bina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.