Literature DB >> 31980537

EPA's proposed transparency rule: Factors to consider, many; planets to live on, one.

David B Allison1, Harvey V Fineberg2.   

Abstract

Year:  2020        PMID： 31980537      PMCID： PMC7071867          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1922721117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age.

Authors:  Timothy H Vines; Arianne Y K Albert; Rose L Andrew; Florence Débarre; Dan G Bock; Michelle T Franklin; Kimberly J Gilbert; Jean-Sébastien Moore; Sébastien Renaut; Diana J Rennison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.

Authors:  E J Masicampo; Daniel R Lalande
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Getting the EPA back on track.

Authors:  Marie Lynn Miranda
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Inappropriate fiddling with statistical analyses to obtain a desirable p-value: tests to detect its presence in published literature.

Authors:  Gary L Gadbury; David B Allison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  All science should inform policy and regulation.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Getting rigorous with scientific rigor.

Authors:  Lorne J Hofseth
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.944
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.