Literature DB >> 31980428

Role of Cecal Microbiota in the Differential Resistance of Inbred Chicken Lines to Colonization by Campylobacter jejuni.

Cosmin Chintoan-Uta1, Trong Wisedchanwet1, Laura Glendinning1, Abi Bremner1, Androniki Psifidi1,2, Lonneke Vervelde1, Kellie Watson1, Mick Watson1, Mark P Stevens3.   

Abstract

Campylobacteriosis is the leading foodborne bacterial diarrheal illness in many countries, with up to 80% of human cases attributed to the avian reservoir. The only control strategies currently available are stringent on-farm biosecurity and carcass treatments. Heritable differences in the resistance of chicken lines to Campylobacter colonization have been reported and resistance-associated quantitative trait loci are emerging, although their impact on colonization appears modest. Recent studies indicated a protective role of the microbiota against colonization by Campylobacter in chickens. Furthermore, in murine models, differences in resistance to bacterial infections can be partially transferred between lines by transplantation of gut microbiota. In this study, we investigated whether heritable differences in colonization of inbred chicken lines by Campylobacter jejuni are associated with differences in cecal microbiota. We performed homologous and heterologous cecal microbiota transplants between line 61 (resistant) and line N (susceptible) by orally administering cecal contents collected from 3-week-old donors to day-of-hatch chicks. Recipient birds were challenged (day 21) with C. jejuni 11168H. In birds given homologous microbiota, the differential resistance of lines to C. jejuni colonization was reproduced. Contrary to our hypothesis, transfer of cecal microbiota from line 61 to line N significantly increased C. jejuni colonization. No significant difference in the overall composition of the cecal microbial communities of the two lines was identified, although line-specific differences for specific operational taxonomic units were identified. Our data suggest that while heritable differences in avian resistance to Campylobacter colonization exist, these are not explained by significant variation in the cecal microbiota.IMPORTANCE Campylobacter is a leading cause of foodborne diarrheal disease worldwide. Poultry are a key source of human infections, but there are currently few effective measures against Campylobacter in poultry during production. One option to control Campylobacter may be to alter the composition of microbial communities in the avian intestines by introducing beneficial bacteria, which exclude the harmful ones. We previously described two inbred chicken lines which differ in resistance to intestinal colonization by Campylobacter Here, we investigated the composition of the microbial communities in the gut of these lines and whether transferring gut bacteria between the resistant and susceptible lines alters their resistance to Campylobacter No major differences in microbial populations were found, and resistance or susceptibility to colonization was not conferred by transferring gut bacteria between lines. The data suggest that gut microbiota did not play a role in resistance to Campylobacter colonization, at least in the lines used.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; chickens; colonization; intestinal microbiota; microbiota; resistance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31980428      PMCID: PMC7082564          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02607-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  34 in total

1.  Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform.

Authors:  James J Kozich; Sarah L Westcott; Nielson T Baxter; Sarah K Highlander; Patrick D Schloss
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data.

Authors:  Evguenia Kopylova; Laurent Noé; Hélène Touzet
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Genome-wide SNP analysis identifies major QTL for Salmonella colonization in the chicken.

Authors:  M S Fife; J S Howell; N Salmon; P M Hocking; P M van Diemen; M A Jones; M P Stevens; P Kaiser
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Colonization of a commercial broiler line by Campylobacter is under limited genetic control and does not significantly impair performance or intestinal health.

Authors:  Richard A Bailey; Andreas Kranis; Androniki Psifidi; Kellie A Watson; Lisa Rothwell; Paul M Hocking; Pete Kaiser; Mark P Stevens; Santiago Avendano
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Altering host resistance to infections through microbial transplantation.

Authors:  Benjamin P Willing; Anjalee Vacharaksa; Matthew Croxen; Teerawat Thanachayanont; B Brett Finlay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition.

Authors:  Siddhartha Mandal; Will Van Treuren; Richard A White; Merete Eggesbø; Rob Knight; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2015-05-29

7.  Influence of the Gut Microbiota Composition on Campylobacter jejuni Colonization in Chickens.

Authors:  Zifeng Han; Thomas Willer; Li Li; Colin Pielsticker; Ivan Rychlik; Philippe Velge; Bernd Kaspers; Silke Rautenschlein
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Extensive microbial and functional diversity within the chicken cecal microbiome.

Authors:  Martin J Sergeant; Chrystala Constantinidou; Tristan A Cogan; Michael R Bedford; Charles W Penn; Mark J Pallen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Economic Cost of Campylobacter, Norovirus and Rotavirus Disease in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Clarence C Tam; Sarah J O'Brien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of the timing of exposure to Campylobacter jejuni on the gut microbiome and inflammatory responses of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Phillippa L Connerton; Philip J Richards; Geraldine M Lafontaine; Peter M O'Kane; Nacheervan Ghaffar; Nicola J Cummings; Darren L Smith; Neville M Fish; Ian F Connerton
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 14.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Transcriptomic analysis of caecal tissue in inbred chicken lines that exhibit heritable differences in resistance to Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Kay M Russell; Jacqueline Smith; Abi Bremner; Cosmin Chintoan-Uta; Lonneke Vervelde; Androniki Psifidi; Mark P Stevens
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Differences in caecal microbiota composition and Salmonella carriage between experimentally infected inbred lines of chickens.

Authors:  Anaïs Cazals; Jordi Estellé; Nicolas Bruneau; Jean-Luc Coville; Pierrette Menanteau; Marie-Noëlle Rossignol; Deborah Jardet; Claudia Bevilacqua; Andrea Rau; Bertrand Bed'Hom; Philippe Velge; Fanny Calenge
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 3.  Impacts of Gut Microbiota on the Immune System and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Re-Emerging Therapy for Autoimmune Diseases.

Authors:  Ashenafi Feyisa Beyi; Michael Wannemuehler; Paul J Plummer
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 4.  Centennial Review: Factors affecting the chicken gastrointestinal microbial composition and their association with gut health and productive performance.

Authors:  Yugal Raj Bindari; Priscilla F Gerber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.