Literature DB >> 31980203

Bond strength between a high-performance thermoplastic and a veneering resin.

Nina Lümkemann1, Marlis Eichberger2, Bogna Stawarczyk3.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: High-performance thermoplastics have been adopted as framework materials. However, their bond strength to an esthetic veneering material is unclear.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to test the tensile bond strength (TBS) between an aryl-ketone polymer (Ultaire AKP) and veneering resins.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: AKP substrates (N=324) were prepared, airborne-particle abraded (Al2O3, 50 μm, 0.2 MPa), and divided into 9 groups (n=36) with different bonding systems (visio.link, Adhese Universal, All-Bond Universal, CLEARFIL UNIVERSAL BOND, G-Premio BOND, iBOND Universal, ONE COAT 7 UNIVERSAL, Scotchbond Universal) and without a bonding system as a control. Each group was further divided for opaquer (n=18). Further subdivision followed according to flowable or paste veneering resin (n=9). Specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37 °C and thermocycled (×5000, 5/55 °C). TBS was measured and analyzed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and 3-way ANOVA with partial eta squared (ηP2), followed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests. Relative frequency of failure types was analyzed with the Chi2-test and a Ciba-Geigy table.
RESULTS: The highest impact on TBS was exerted by the adhesive (ηP2=0.458, P<.001), followed by opaquer (ηP2=0.288, P<.001). The binary combination of the 3 variables was significant for opaquer coupled with adhesive (ηP2=0.173, P<.001). Visio.link showed the highest TBS followed by All-Bond Universal and Scotchbond Universal. Opaquer increased the TBS for all adhesives except for visio.link. Without adhesive, opaquer obtained comparable TBS to visio.link. Flowable veneering resin showed higher TBS than paste resin.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of opaquer increased TBS for all universal adhesives. Using opaquer and flowable veneering resin is beneficial for bonding to Ultaire AKP.
Copyright © 2019 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31980203     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  5 in total

1.  Impact of the material and sintering protocol, layer thickness, and thermomechanical aging on the two-body wear and fracture load of 4Y-TZP crowns.

Authors:  Felicitas Mayinger; Ramona Buser; Maximilian Laier; Lisa Marie Schönhoff; Matthias Kelch; Rüdiger Hampe; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 2.  Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): An emerging biomaterial for oral implants and dental prostheses.

Authors:  Hatim Alqurashi; Zohaib Khurshid; Azeem Ul Yaqin Syed; Syed Rashid Habib; Dinesh Rokaya; Muhammad Sohail Zafar
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 10.479

3.  Optical Properties and Color Stability of Dental PEEK Related to Artificial Ageing and Staining.

Authors:  Liliana Porojan; Flavia Roxana Toma; Roxana Diana Vasiliu; Florin-Ionel Topală; Sorin Daniel Porojan; Anamaria Matichescu
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.329

4.  Effect of Nano Titanium Oxide with Different Surface Treatments on Color Stability of Red-Tinted Silicone Rubber.

Authors:  Yalin Wang
Journal:  Int J Anal Chem       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 1.698

Review 5.  Overviews on the Progress of Flowable Dental Polymeric Composites: Their Composition, Polymerization Process, Flowability and Radiopacity Aspects.

Authors:  Evangelia C Vouvoudi
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.