| Literature DB >> 31979175 |
Jinli Ma1, Xiao Wang1, Jing Li2, Ru Chen1, Ju Wei1.
Abstract
A new approach for flame retardant functional finishing of textiles was explored to improve flame retardancy of cotton fabrics by simple physical adhesion method. Mg(OH)2 was adhered to cotton fiber with the aid of fiber swelling in ionic liquid on heating and shrinkage on washing to obtain flame retardancy. The effects of immobilizing condition and methods on flame retardancy were discussed. The surface morphology, crystal structure, combustion behavior, thermal and physical properties of cotton fabric adhered with Mg(OH)2 were analyzed. The afterflame time and afterglow time of adhered cotton fabric were significantly reduced to less than 5 s. The thermal weight loss of cotton fabric was increased by 11.7% and the total heat released per unit mass was decreased by 20.9% after MH adhesion. The simple eco-friendly adhesion method provided a convenient approach for the development and application of flame retardant functional cellulosic textiles.Entities:
Keywords: Mg(OH)2; cotton fabric; flame retardancy; ionic liquid; physical adhesion
Year: 2020 PMID: 31979175 PMCID: PMC7077185 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Swelling of cotton fibers by IL with time varying.
Figure 2Swelling of CF in IL with time varying.
The data of flame retardancy of CF/MH under different adhesion conditions.
| Spraying Temperature/Heating Time/Heating Temperature/Tension | Adhesion Ratio of MH/% | Warp Shrinkage Ratio/% | Weft Shrinkage Ratio/% | Afterflame Time/s | Afterglow Time/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 40.8 |
| 36 °C/10 min/105 °C | 4.00 | 9.71 | 38.83 | 8.9 | 16.1 |
| 39 °C/10 min/105 °C | 9.89 | 11.43 | 40.95 | 7.1 | 10.6 |
| 41 °C/10 min/105 °C | 9.74 | 12.57 | 42.86 | 11.1 | 10.0 |
| 39 °C/3 min/95 °C | 4.20 | 0 | 4.72 | 1.2 | 15.7 |
| 39 °C/6 min/95 °C | 7.99 | 1.09 | 15.24 | 2.4 | 3.5 |
| 39 °C/10 min/95 °C | 9.38 | 0.84 | 31.78 | 6.6 | 2.1 |
| 39 °C/10 min/105 °C/under no tension | 10.13 | 20.28 | 42.37 | 9.0 | 13.6 |
The data of flame retardancy of CF/MH under different heating methods.
| Samples | Adhesion Ratio of MH/% | Warp Shrinkage Ratio/% | Weft Shrinkage Ratio/% | Afterflame Time/s | Afterglow Time/s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 °C | hot air | 7.86 | 0 | 16.35 | 4.6 | 7.9 |
| 95 °C | 9.38 | 0.84 | 31.78 | 6.6 | 2.1 | |
| 105 °C | 9.89 | 11.43 | 40.95 | 7.1 | 10.6 | |
| 80 °C | hot stamping | 6.28 | 0.83 | 1.90 | 3.2 | 4.0 |
| 90 °C | 7.36 | 1.40 | 2.13 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
| 95 °C | 8.02 | 2.00 | 2.86 | 2.5 | 4.6 | |
| 105 °C | 10.33 | 2.86 | 3.46 | 2.8 | 5.2 | |
Figure 3Images of CF and treated CF: (a) CF; (b) CF swelled by IL (wet state); (c) CF swelled by IL (wet state and high multiple); (d) CF swelled by MH/IL suspension (wet state); (e) CF swelled by IL via hot air; (f) CF swelled by IL via hot stamping; (g) CF/MH via hot air; (h) CF/MH via hot stamping.
Figure 4XRD curves of MH, CF, CF swelled by IL via hot air and hot stamping, CF/MH via hot air and hot stamping, warp yarn, and weft yarn of CF/MH via hot air.
Figure 5TGA and DTG curves of CF, MH, and CF/MH via hot air and CF/MH via hot stamping.
The thermal decomposition temperature and weight loss of MH, CF, and CF/MH via hot air and hot stamping.
| Sample | Weight Loss/% | Maximum Decomposition Temperature/°C |
|---|---|---|
| MH | 35.4 | 411.3 |
| CF | 91.4 | 359.5 |
| CF/MH via hot air | 79.7 | 371.0 |
| CF/MH via hot stamping | 88.5 | 367.2 |
Figure 6HRR curves of CF, CF/MH via hot air, and CF/MH via hot stamping.
Physical properties of CF and CF/MH via hot air and hot stamping.
| Samples | Bending Rigidity/cN.mm−1 | Activity Ratio/% | Breaking Strength/N | Breaking Elongation Ratio/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF | 0.95 | 52.44 | 593 | 12.9 |
| CF/MH via hot air | 1.09 | 45.31 | 787 | 13.7 |
| CF/MH via hot stamping | 2.15 | 17.90 | 662 | 12.1 |