| Literature DB >> 31979047 |
Arabela Elena Untea1, Iulia Varzaru1, Tatiana Dumitra Panaite1, Teodor Gavris1, Alexandra Lupu1, Mariana Ropota1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of dietary inclusion of walnut and bilberry leaves (WL and BL), as sources of natural antioxidants in poultry diets, on the enrichment of antioxidant nutrients in the egg yolk and on the susceptibility of the yolk to lipid peroxidation during storage. The experiment was conducted on 32-week-old TETRA SL LL laying hens, which were assigned to three dietary treatments with 30 birds each. Each treatment was replicated 10 times with three chicks per replicate pen. Experimental dietary treatments differed from control diet (C) by addition of 0.5% BL supplement or 1% WL supplement. The phytoadditives were not significant contributors to the productive parameters. The addition of BL and WL in laying hens' diets significantly increased the total polyphenol content, and the zinc, lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in the egg yolks. In regards to the oxidative stability parameters, a significant decrease in the concentrations of primary oxidation products formed in the egg yolk of experimental groups was seen, proving an efficient inhibition effect of the phytoadditives on peroxyl radical formation. A significant correlation was observed between primary oxidation products and total polyphenol content of the egg yolks, where zinc, lutein and zeaxanthin are the bioactive compounds that inhibit the formation of secondary oxidation products.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant nutrients; bilberry leaves; egg yolk; laying hens; oxidative stability.; walnut leaves
Year: 2020 PMID: 31979047 PMCID: PMC7070516 DOI: 10.3390/ani10020191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Composition and chemical analyses of the basal diets.
| Ingredients. | C Group (%) | BL (%) | WL (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 30 | 29.5 | 29 |
| Wheat | 31.46 | 31.46 | 31.46 |
| Gluten | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Soybean meal | 21.2 | 21.2 | 21.2 |
| Vegetable Oil | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.46 |
| Lysine | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Methionine | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Calcium carbonate | 8.78 | 8.78 | 8.78 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.46 |
| Salt | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Choline | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Billberry leaves | 0 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Walnut leaves | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Premix 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
|
| |||
| Dry matter | 88.06 | 89.12 | 88.64 |
| M.E. poultry, (kcal/kg) | 2800 | 2800 | 2800 |
| Crude protein | 17.80 | 17.78 | 17.82 |
| Crude fat | 2.94 | 2.93 | 2.94 |
| Crude fiber | 4.06 | 4.21 | 4.20 |
| Calcium | 3.90 | 3.90 | 3.90 |
| Available phosphorous | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.42 |
| Lysine | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| Methionine | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.44 |
| Met + cis | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| Threonine | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 |
| Triphtopan | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
1 Content per kg diet: vitamin A: 13,500 IU; vitamin D3: 3000 IU; vitamin E: 27 mg; vitamin K3: 2 mg; vitamin B1: 2 mg; vitamin B2: 4.8 mg; pantothenic acid: 14.85 mg; nicotinic acid: 27 mg; vitamin B6: 3 mg; vitamin B7: 0.04 mg; vitamin B9: 1 mg; vitamin B12: 0.018 mg; vitamin C: 25 mg; manganese: 71.9 mg; iron: 60 mg; copper: 6 mg; zinc: 60 mg; cobalt: 0.5 mg; iodine: 1.14 mg; selenium: 0.18 mg.
The oxidative stability-influencing parameters of dietary supplements and experimental diets.
| Bilberry Leaves | Walnut Leaves | C | BL | WL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAC (mM equiv asc acid) * | 301.46 | 254.29 | 36.37 | 40.72 | 35.86 |
| TAC (mM equiv vit E) * | 184.15 | 141.15 | 30.87 | 34.98 | 30.52 |
| TP (mg/g) * | 51.73 | 56.75 | 2.13 | 2.51 | 2.55 |
| Vitamin E (mg/kg) | 111.28 | 157.54 | 38.73 | 48.15 | 41.16 |
| Lutein and Zeaxanthin (mg/kg) | 70.59 | 264.09 | 8.18 | 9.42 | 12.99 |
| Zinc (mg/kg) | 43.88 | 32.64 | 103.66 | 103.96 | 104.53 |
* TAC - total antioxidant capacity; TP - total polyphenols.
The effect of supplemental bilberry and walnut leaves on the productive parameters of the laying hens.
| C | BL | WL | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Body Weight (kg) | 1.71 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 0.054 | 0.6256 |
| Final Body Weight (kg) | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.79 | 0.068 | 0.8259 |
| Average Daily Feed Intake (g/hen) | 108.29 | 103.18 | 105.81 | 0.777 | 0.7865 |
| Feed Conversion Ratio (kg feed/kg egg) | 1.83 | 1.86 | 1.85 | 0.021 | 0.5557 |
| Egg Weight (g) | 60.43 a | 58.02 c | 58.99 b | 0.153 | <0.0001 |
| Laying Percentage | 98.22 | 96.07 | 98.21 | 0.752 | 0.0731 |
Means within a row with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05).
The oxidative stability-influencing parameters in egg yolks, collected at the end of the experiment.
| C | BL | WL | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAC (mM equiv AA) * | 5.10 | 6.44 | 6.05 | 0.412 | 0.1011 |
| TAC (mM equiv vit E) * | 4.38 | 5.65 | 4.67 | 0.399 | 0.1014 |
| TP (mg/g) * | 0.94b | 1.03a | 1.02a | 0.015 | 0.0022 |
| Vitamin E (mg/kg) | 105.12 | 118.46 | 106.94 | 4.770 | 0.1430 |
| Vitamin A (mg/kg) | 10.02b | 12.61a | 11.09b | 0.625 | 0.0218 |
| Lutein and Zeaxanthin (mg/kg) | 9.60b | 12.06a | 13.14a | 0.392 | 0.0001 |
| Zinc (mg/kg) | 79.10b | 81.96a | 81.92a | 0.419 | 0.0005 |
a,b Means within a row with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). * TAC: total antioxidant capacity; TP: total polyphenols.
The fatty acid composition of egg yolks, collected at the end of the experiment.
| C | BL | WL | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C 14:0 | 0.36 | 0.,34 | 0.33 | 0.0241 | 0.6349 |
| C 14:1 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.0046 | 0.9580 |
| C 15:0 | 0.07 a | 0.07 ab | 0.06 abc | 0.0052 | 0.4813 |
| C 15:1 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.0149 | 0.5782 |
| C 16:0 | 25.98 a | 25.36 ab | 24.82 b | 0.1892 | 0.0023 |
| C 16:1 | 3.71 a | 3.35 b | 3.47 ab | 0.0949 | 0.0456 |
| C 17:0 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.0140 | 0.2480 |
| C 17:1 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.0110 | 0.2309 |
| C 18:0 | 10.66 b | 10.78 b | 10.89 b | 0.2637 | 0.8314 |
| C 18:1 | 33.76 | 33.55 | 34.88 | 0.3845 | 0.0583 |
| C 18:2n6 | 16.39 b | 17.53 a | 16.44 b | 0.0782 | <0.0001 |
| C 18:3n6 | 0.13 b | 0.14 a | 0.14 ab | 0.0048 | 0.0505 |
| C 18:3n3 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.0294 | 0.1077 |
| C 20:2n6 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.0159 | 0.2728 |
| C 20:3n6 | 0.26 b | 0.32 a | 0.27 b | 0.0108 | 0.0039 |
| C 22:1n9 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.0083 | 0.7582 |
| C20:3n3 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.0254 | 0.2379 |
| C 20:4n6 | 3.88 | 3.89 | 3.90 | 0.1382 | 0.9939 |
| C 24:1n9 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.0103 | 0.1093 |
| C 22:4n6 | 0.96 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.0394 | 0.0803 |
| C 22:5n3 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.0079 | 0.4040 |
| C 22:6n3 | 1.68 | 1.68 | 1.79 | 0.0641 | 0.3921 |
| Other Fatty Acids | 0.23 a | 0.02 b | 0.08 b | 0.0264 | 0.0002 |
| TOTAL | |||||
| Σ SFA * | 37.17 | 36.69 | 36.22 | 0.3317 | 0.1638 |
| Σ MUFA * | 38.10 | 37.53 | 39.02 | 0.4577 | 0.1016 |
| Σ n-3 | 2.71 | 2.82 | 2.77 | 0.0651 | 0.4906 |
| Σ n-6 | 21.78 b | 22.93 a | 21.91 b | 0.1736 | 0.0005 |
| Ratio n-6/n-3 | 8.05 | 8.12 | 7.92 | 0.1523 | 0.6477 |
| AI * | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.0083 | 0.0992 |
| TI * | 0.97 a | 0.94 ab | 0.92 b | 0.0107 | 0.0395 |
| n3 D5 + D6 | 75.49 | 73.48 | 77.05 | 1.3323 | 0.1992 |
| n6 D5 + D6 | 19.73 | 18.89 | 19.88 | 0.5576 | 0.4202 |
a,b,c Means within a row with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). * SFA: saturated fatty acids; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; AI: atherogenicity index; TI: thrombogenicity index.
Effect of dietary phytoadditives on egg yolk oxidative stability during storage.
| C | BL | WL | SEM | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Oxidation Products | |||||
| PV * (meq active O2/kg) | 0.17 a | 0.14 ab | 0.13 b | 0.0097 | 0.0250 |
| CD * (µmol/g) | 7.54 a | 5.02 b | 3.75 b | 0.3623 | 0.0001 |
| CT * (µmol/g) | 2.29 a | 1.46 b | 1.34 ab | 0.1530 | 0.0383 |
| Secondary Oxidation Products | |||||
| p-Anisidine | 6.42 | 4.57 | 4.05 | 0.6984 | 0.0914 |
| TBARS (mg/kg) | 0.15 a | 0.13 b | 0.12 b | 0.0052 | 0.0187 |
a,b Means within a row with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05) * PV: peroxide value; CD: conjugated dienes; CT: conjugated trienes; p-anisidine: para anisidine; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.
Correlations between nutrients with antioxidant activity and lipid peroxidation parameters.
| TP | Vit E | Vit A | Lutein | Zn | PV | CD | CT | P Anis | TBARS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP *** | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.65 ** | 0.77 * | −0.63 ** | −0.66 ** | −0.45 | −0.39 | −0.48 |
| Vit E | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.05 | 0.10 | −0.12 | −0.19 | −0.20 | −0.32 | −0.14 | |
| Vit A | 1.00 | 0.01 | 0.09 | −0.19 | −0.11 | −0.20 | −0.10 | −0.19 | ||
| Lutein | 1.00 | 0.78 * | −0.65 ** | −0.72 ** | −0.42 | −0.63 ** | −0.64 ** | |||
| Zn | 1.00 | −0.61 ** | −0.52 ** | −0.46 | −0.55 ** | −0.40 | ||||
| PV *** | 1.00 | 0.70 ** | 0.50 | 0.62 ** | 0.54 ** | |||||
| CD *** | 1.00 | 0.70 * | 0.45 | 0.66 ** | ||||||
| CT *** | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.62 ** | |||||||
| P Anis *** | 1.00 | 0.59 ** | ||||||||
| TBARS | 1 |
* Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha = 0.001; ** Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha = 0.05; *** TP: total polyphenols; PV: peroxide value; CD: conjugated dienes; CT: conjugated trienes; p anis: para anisidine; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.