Literature DB >> 31978722

Emerging indoor pollutants.

Tunga Salthammer1.   

Abstract

There is an increasing use of so-called emerging substances or substances of emerging concern. These terms describe, inter alia, the replacement of commonly used chemicals in formulations by supposedly less harmful chemicals. A well-known example is the shift from DEHP to higher molecular weight phthalates and later the shift from phthalates to DINCH, adipates, terephthalates, etc. Similar trends can be observed in the case of solvents and flame retardants. Over the years, new compound groups such as perfluorocarbons, UV-filters, synthetic musks, parabens, siloxanes, neonicotinoids and drug residues also appeared on the scene. Today, however, the term "emerging substances" has to be defined much more broadly as regards the indoor environment. As a result of the extensive measures for energy-related renovation, contaminated waste products such as asbestos, PCBs, PAHs and PCNs are once again forming the focus of attention as re-emerging chemicals. Many relevant compounds, in particular reaction products, were unknown until recently due to the fact, that they can only now be detected using highly sensitive methods. Furthermore, already known chemicals attract scientific and public interest through reclassification or through the derivation of indoor guideline and reference values. The classical way of monitoring emerging compounds is air and dust analysis and therefore, the spectrum of analytical techniques needs to be continuously broadened. However, there is also a demand for human biomarkers, preferably in urine. A further important aspect is the post-hoc analysis of house dust and urine samples, which are stored in environmental specimen banks. The identification and temporal tracking of emerging chemicals is thereby enabled. It is strongly recommended to take advantage of the possibilities resulting from the combination of classical interior analytics and human biomonitoring to promptly detect emerging pollutants and chemicals of concern.
Copyright © 2019 The Author. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Déjà vu chemicals; Emerging compounds; House dust; Legacy compounds

Year:  2019        PMID: 31978722     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.113423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  5 in total

Review 1.  Placenta Disrupted: Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jeremy Gingrich; Elvis Ticiani; Almudena Veiga-Lopez
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 12.015

2.  Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S.

Authors:  Magdalena Zaborowska; Jadwiga Wyszkowska; Agata Borowik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Volatile Organic Compounds in Finnish Office Environments in 2010-2019 and Their Relevance to Adverse Health Effects.

Authors:  Kaisa Wallenius; Hanna Hovi; Jouko Remes; Selma Mahiout; Tuula Liukkonen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Microplastics and their Additives in the Indoor Environment.

Authors:  Tunga Salthammer
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 16.823

5.  Selection of metric for indoor-outdoor source apportionment of metals in PM2.5 : mg/kg versus ng/m3.

Authors:  Pat E Rasmussen; Christine Levesque; Owen Butler; Marc Chénier; H David Gardner
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 6.554

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.